Zapper to stop chases.

So do I.

That's a bit of a given isn't it....

Anyway, my Lucas Rita ignition will it be affected by the cop-death-ray
thing or is Lucas still at the valve end of technology?

 

Not even that. Wick and flint, I think.

 

Would it stop a Faraday cage?

 

Champ says...

My oldest bike (18 years this year) is the most technologically
advanced[/QUOTE]

But it's the slowest and worst handling of all the bikes you own, so all
that technology counts for nowt.

 

It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the

Fucknose. It wouldn't stop a faraway cage, that's for sure.
I first heard of this utterly yonks ago and thought it wouldn't work on
the car electrical systems of the day, being as how they were so crude.
That, and the metal shielding of the bodywork.

Might've caused the villians some mild annoyance, not being able to play
toonz as the boombox burnt out.

Nuke the fuckers, and count the bodies, it's the only way to be sure.

--

Dave

GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
SbS#6 DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#6 FUB#3
FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19 COSOC#10

 

You been watching to much Aliens. You forget to say from orbit.

And wasn't Stinger was meant to be the be-all-end-all solution to car crime
once upon a time ago?

How about a "chatter to stop chases"? ......
Bore the **** out of them on loudspeaker - one way to make a productive
contribution to society from the labour/conservative/lib dem et al otherwise
wasted with their canvassing crap?
The little dickheads would soon lose the will to live given a recount of
Frost on Sunday or similar, certainly take some amount of joy out of their
activities anyway )

Tone

 

"Guns don't kill people - zappers do."

 

I assume you mean the Turbo?

I'd take issue that its the most advance technologically, especially
compared against your GSXR.

It's got a Turbo. So what? I've worked on 50 year old diesels that had
turbos. Not exactly cutting edge.

The materials; the calculations; the equipment used to design and
manufacture your GSXR are far more advanced than the paper; slide rule
and pencil used in 1971 (?) to come up with the Z engine.

The amount of modern and advanced technology that makes the fuel
injection system as effective as it undoubtably is trumps your rather
primitive turbo.

There again you may not mean your turbo; which makes this all rather
silly.

 

How do you figure that one then? Shirley the EMS on the gixxer will be
much more advanced, in processing terms, than that on the turbo?

 

As others have pointed out, I /think/ he's trying to claim that:

20-odd year old FI + turbo > 3 year old FI (in technological terms, and
conveniently ignoring all sorts of other characteristics of the two bikes).

Alternatively, he /could/ be fishing...

 

Well yes, clearly, but equally clearly he's not thought about how much
information is being sampled and acted on in the two systems...

Shorely not?

 

Pah - the turbo has fuel injection too!

 

Just being a bit lazy, really. OK, it's got digital FI, a turbo,
anti-dive etc etc. The gixxer has water cooling & 16 valves, but
otherwise it's pretyy much a UJM

I wasn't.

 

And you don't think the superior engine design, suspension components,
aerodynamics, electronics etc. etc. count as technology?

 

Yeah, but water-cooled, multi-valve engines were around 20-odd years
ago. What about all the other flashy stuff: fancy coating on the forks;
materials used in the construction of the frame, engine, etc., that just
couldn't be worked with back then; ram-air, even?

Ah, well. One man's lazy response is another man's bait.

 

What about leathers with humps and stick on helmet ears eh? Time has not
stood still.( though I will except that a few people round here have had
humped leathers for years).

 

Mebbe. But evoluntionary refinements in, say, materials technology
(thus allowing high revs, for example) don't get the juices going the
way the word T U R B O !!! does, do they

 

My GT380 had that!

 

My GT380 had that![/QUOTE]

Yeah, right.

 

Yeah, right.
[/QUOTE]
Have you tried googling on "GT380 ram air" oh sceptical one?