On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 20:18:19 +0100, dwb yammered: [of the new R1] Look, you're in enough bother already, matey... ;-)
It's what the Japs do, mostly, isn't it? Every once in a while one of them goes a bit daring and the rest follow suit. For my money, the last significant change of this ilk was the original R1 back in 1998 when things suddenly got smaller, lighter and more powerful. Pretty much /every/ Jap sportsbike since then has been of the same mould from 600s up to litre-bikes. Prior to that, it was (probably) the ZZR1100; cue Blackbird, 'Busa and 12R (albeit with bigger gaps between). Prior to that, it was the original 'Blade in '92, etc., etc. Well, for a start, one reason the CBR6RR looks daft is 'cause it's not "they", is it? It's "it"; the cat's ring-piece look. I think whatever way you cut that particular cake, it has to be into even numbers; one = gash, two = cool, three = gash, four = cool...
Hmm, the tail piece (not the pipes, the bodywork) looks very 999-esque from some angles; not as clean and chiselled as the gorgeous 2003 arse-end. Personally, I like the look of the quad projector lights a la R6, although I've heard complaints that the R6 items are not very effective... As I said elsewhere, I think the clocks are stylish, mind.
Well thanks for the history lesson, granddad! ;-) I was just trying to draw a rough example of what the Japs have done for years, i.e. copy from each other and attempt to improve (although not always succeeding). You're right about the GPz, though and I wasn't trying to compare the ZZR and the 'Blade as they are very different creatures, so perhaps I should have worded it better. Cheers.
Nar the GPZ900R was the first of the superbikes where handling and aerodynamics were treated with as much priority as the engine. The Kats were just GSXs in a posh frock.