Why synthetic oil weeps

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by Mike W., Nov 27, 2005.

  1. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    I've heard in numerous corners that when you run synthetic oil in an engine
    that spent it's early life living on standard oil that it weeps. There's a
    commercial for some brand of oil on tv now that explicitly states that the
    synthetic weepage rumor is pure urban myth. Yet my KZ1000P which has been
    treated rather well over it's mere 28k mi is progressively weeping more
    with each ride. It's significant at more than 1ml/mi now. Virtually no oil
    out the exhaust other than the valve guide seal stuff at start up. I'm
    giving this phenomena more credence than the oil company would like but I'm
    hopefully still open minded. Any day now I'll be taking the KZp out of
    service and starting the process of rebuilding the engine.

    My question is... does anyone KNOW from some kind of science that was done
    on this problem whether this is a real issue, and then if so, did that
    science get to the bottom of what the cause was? I've heard a "molecular
    size" idea advanced but he was making it up as he went along. I'm looking
    for informed input on this... I've heard all the speculation about this
    anyone needs for a couple of lifetimes now:) Thanks in advance for any help
    you can give me on this.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. <snip>

    It's bollocks. Your Kawa has developed an oil leak. Shit happens.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 27, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. I've never, ever experienced an oil leak that I could put down to the
    use of synthetic oil.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 27, 2005
    #3
  4. Mike W.

    OH- Guest

    If the oil is disappearing when you ride (you said 1ml/mi) and
    not when parked (or does it indeed form an oil slick?), it's
    not what I'd call weeping but burning or spitting out oil.

    A 1000cc bike that needs an engine rebuild at 28k miles !!??
    Someone has used the bike to it's full potential or mistreated
    it, no wonder it uses oil.

    And, to add my voice to the choir: I can't really say I've
    seen a difference with synthetic when it comes to leakage.
     
    OH-, Nov 27, 2005
    #4
  5. I have had experience with pure synthetic and it leaks more than with
    semi-synthetic. Whether that is due to the oil or just my perception I
    don't know.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 27, 2005
    #5
  6. Mike W.

    Sunbug72 Guest

    It think this is mostly BS with newer engines made in the last 15 years.
    Now, for the old stuff, yes you will have a problem running synth in older
    engines with plane old rubber seals. The synth oil will degrade older style
    rubber seals and thus leak. Therefore you need to upgrade your seals to
    silicone based materials.

    In your case, the fact that the motor has 28k on orignial seals might be a
    major contributor.
     
    Sunbug72, Nov 27, 2005
    #6
  7. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Thanks but I'm really looking for data that goes a little deeper than this.
    I invented the in your face all-style and no-substance reply:) I need more
    this time. BTW.. seeping from at least a dozen places, all of which
    occurred over 6000 miles.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #7
  8. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Good stuff now... this is anecdotal and doesn't prove the point but it
    still contributes. Thanks.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #8
  9. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    I have a known issue with the valve guide oil seals. AND I have significant
    surface oil appearing on the engine from numerous places on the top end.
    I have done a great deal of drilling with it at slow speed but always
    breeze it out appropriately.

    http://users.crocker.com/~mwilliams/Parking_Lot_Moves.htm if you're
    interested.

    I've also been around a LOT of KZP trainers that use conventional oil and
    no seepage like I see on this one.
    Thanks. The design on this goes back to the 80's (really 70's) and I'm not
    sure they ever upgraded the seal technology along the way.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #9
  10. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Thanks Pierce. What is the extent of the problem you've noticed? How long
    before change over did it take to manifest?

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #10
  11. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    THIS is a FANTASTIC clue... thanks. It's a 99 but it's a design that goes
    back to 82. No idea if the seal technology was ever upgraded. I know police
    departments would never spring for synthetic.. they let them suffer
    detonation in fact by running the lower octane fuel.
    Thanks.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #11
  12. On the transmission in question it seemed to leak worse immediately after
    the change. I changed it back and it still leaked but it wasn't as bad.
    If 0 is dry and 10 is pouring out the dino oil leaked about a 4. With
    synthetic it leaked about a 6. After changing it back it leaked about a 5.

    pierce
     
    R. Pierce Butler, Nov 27, 2005
    #12
  13. Mike W.

    LJ Guest

    Can I ask you a question Mike. Have you ever posted to this NG under a
    different name?
     
    LJ, Nov 27, 2005
    #13
  14. It's an old bike.

    As has been pointed out, seals dry out.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 27, 2005
    #14
  15. I think it is safe yo say that the Japanese will not still be using
    1982-era seals, ffs.

    Am I the only person who thinks this entire thread is a red herring?
     
    The Older Gentleman, Nov 27, 2005
    #15
  16. Mike W.

    David Kelly Guest

    There is nothing about "synthetic" which equates to "more detergent
    action." Motor oil has exactly the detergent properties its designers
    intended, whether it be manufactured with synthetic or refined processes.

    Synthetic motor oil has exactly the same chemistry as refined oil. The
    difference is that use of synthetic processes allow the designer to
    carefully pick and choose his hydrocarbon cocktail while refining more
    closely resembles successive filtering to get the final product. This is
    why a Court of Arbitration decided in Castrol's favor in Mobil vs.
    Castrol over the definition of "synthetic" when applied to motor oil.
    Castrol used additional refining steps and successfully claimed the end
    result was indistinguishable from "pure synthetic."

    Back to "pure synthetic": its exactly no more and no less than what its
    designers do intentionally. Back in ancient days oil designers didn't
    know how oil reacted with oil seals. Oil seal makers only knew by trial
    and error with refined oils that their product worked. Everybody "knew"
    the adage, "always use the same oil for the life of the engine" without
    really knowing why. If one changed to a different make or model oil,
    often the seals would leak as punishment.

    What was learned was that refined oil had stuff which caused oil seals
    to swell. That different makes/models of oil swelled seals differently.
    That changing to a different oil could cause the old swelling to leach
    out resulting in a loose seal. It just so happened this *always*
    happened with synthetic oils, creating a reputation which lives in lore
    for the past 30 or 40 years.

    All oil and oil seal designers know of this situation and address it.
    Changing from one brand to another could still aggravate the situation
    but no more between brands than crossing between refined and synthetic.

    As for detergent action, the so-called Diesel oils, Delo, Delvac,
    Rotella-T, will have more than most anything else whether refined or
    synthetic.
     
    David Kelly, Nov 27, 2005
    #16
  17. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Thank you.. it sounds like an aging mechanism that isn't a surprise. Just
    new to me.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #17
  18. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Thank you. I'll probably give them a try. This gives me an idea too about
    checking outside of my imagination. Maybe there are some good automotive
    engine sites as well too.
    So you guys have me thinking about this in other directions now. The reason
    I switched over to synthetic wasn't so much for traditional longevity
    reasons as it was for heat management. I'm doing drills at very low speeds
    and it's air-cooled.. in looking into synth, I found I could get a 10-20
    degree drop in engine temp and that was good enough reason for me.
    Experimentation of many kinds of synthetic and synth-blend oils revealed
    basically one oil that gave me a KILLER clutch feel... Mobil1 15W50. The
    other stuff ranged between a vague feel and grabby as hell as temp rose.

    So what I'm thinking now is that while the first 13k mi of this bike's life
    were regular cop work under a lady cop (sorry.. I just assume she didn't
    beat on it as much as a guy), it got progressively more operating hours at
    low speed living in the friction zone (I operate under the assumption I'll
    put a new clutch in each year). More time at temperature. I wonder if heat
    takes out seals? I don't think I'm OVERheating it because I am
    conscientious about breezing it out regularly, but it runs warmer than
    most.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #18
  19. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Thanks Pierce... sounds like this isn't what happened on mine. It was fine
    for a while. The leak happened after 2-3 oil changes. Tilts things a little
    bit in the direction of "the heat theory" above:) In the back of my mind,
    that valve guide oil seal problem I mentioned before might have exacerbated
    it. The VGOS's led to carbon fouling in the combustion chamber and I'm sure
    that was behind a detonation issue I struggled with for some time. I did
    "the water trick" and I'm running octane booster until I get the heads off
    this winter.. det is fully under control.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #19
  20. Mike W.

    Mike W. Guest

    Sure LJ.. I *think* I posted a question in here some time ago. 1-2 years
    ago.. when I was researching the "water trick" in removing carbon fouling
    from a combustion chamber. Maybe not but I think so. I am 99.9% certain I
    would have posted that under this name. I've only been in a handful of
    usenet groups in my "career" and most of my time was spent in just one, all
    under this name.

    Mike
     
    Mike W., Nov 27, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.