Where can we get statistics of which BIKES pass the California DMVriding test?

Your point was to prove that the deluded imbeciles who agree
with your insane Cave Man conspiracy theory are ignorant
dim witted kooks? Well, thanks for the help, but as we all
can see, I certainly didn't need any.....




--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org

 

Unable to cope with the truth, the lunatic screeches his insanity again.

 

Your point was to prove that the deluded imbeciles who agree
with your insane Cave Man conspiracy theory are ignorant
dim witted kooks? Well, thanks for the help, but as we all
can see, I certainly didn't need any.....




--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org

 

The characteristics that you claim are not displayed in
both of the demolitions. Which one do you "think" doesn't
display them, and why? Any idea at all what's on your
"mind"? <chuckle>

http://tinyurl.com/c8c3q4

Your cowardice,lies, and insanity are just too easy to expose.
I'm beginning to pity you, Ray. ;-) See whee you wrote, "No they
don't"? That's was in reply to my claim that "The demolitions
shown in the video below both display all the characteristics
of controlled demolition".
When do you "think" you'll be able to elaborate on these imagined
differences, Ray? <chuckle.


Ray Fischer spewed:

<censored link restored because we can't afford to let freedom,
truth, justice, and America hating nut jobs hide the truth - plus,
it's fun to watch them squirm, back pedal, cower, and weasel when
they're presented with the hard evidence and challenged to address
it> Thanks Ray. ;-)

http://tinyurl.com/c8c3q4

Tell us what you "think" are the most glaring differences
between the two demolitions shown in the link that you're
so desperate to avoid. You said they don't display all the
characteristics of controlled demolition. Which one do you
"think" doesn't look like a controlled demolition, and why?

http://tinyurl.com/c8c3q4
from the fires.

You mentioned "airplane collisions" above. How many do you "think"
collided with WTC7? If none, why do you babble about airplanes during
a discussion WTC7's demolition? Are you insane? Rhetorical, btw, look
it up... ;-)




--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org

 

And the crazy asshole goes off on another one of his rants.

 

What characteristics?

Are you still posting that doctored video? Are you the only one
stupid enough to believe that a 47-story building will fall in exactly
the same amount of time as a 25-story building?

 

Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad agrees with Henry.

Make of that what you will.

 

George Bush and Dick Cheney agree with the nut jobs.

Looks like Amuzi is another deluded conspiracy kook
who's incapable of addressing the actual facts, hard
evidence, and expert research, Let's give him a chance
to prove it, though. ;-)

Let us know if you disagree with anything written below, and
if so, what and why. The writer proves that gradual weaken due
to heat couldn't possibly have caused WTC7's sudden, free fall,
and symmetric drop, and he uses a clear, logical combination of
evidence, basic physics, and common sense to do it.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/f/LeggeLastTry4.pdf

Here is a excerpt from a letter written by Richard Gage, founder of
Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth to NIST.

http://www.ae911truth.org/info/75

TO: Dr. Shyam Sunder, National Institute of Standards and Technology

Dear Dr. Sunder,

Here are our talking points:

1. The NIST November 2008 Final WTC 7 Investigative Report has many
fatal flaws:

a. NIST was forced to acknowledge the free-fall collapse of Building 7
for 100 feet of its 6.5 second fall only after being grilled publicly by
experts who are petition signers of AE911Truth. Yet you do not
acknowledge the obvious implications of such free-fall collapse ? that
the structure had to have been removed forcibly by explosives.
(Anyone knows that a building cannot collapse at the rate of a freely
falling object while simultaneously crushing 40,000 tons of structural
steel because all of its gravitational potential energy has been
converted to motion.)

Free fall, by definition, can only be achieved if a falling structure
or object encounters no significant resistance. Obviously, a steel
frame that's engineered to support several times its own weight can
not crush itself at the the rate of free fall. The belief that it can,
is one of the most comically absurd claims in your impossible magic
fire/Super Arab cartoon conspiracy theory.


The demolitions shown in the video below both display all
the characteristics of controlled demolition, and none of
fire induced failure, yet followers of the government's 9-11
conspiracy theory try to tell us that one was caused by the
partial, gradual, and random weakening of a small percentage
of support columns due to gradual heating, and the other was
caused by the total, instant, and symmetric destruction of all
the support columns due to demolition. They can't have it both
ways. That's why no one can produce even *one* example of a steel
framed high rise that dropped due to fire. Not one. Not ever. Not
anywhere. It's physically impossible.

http://tinyurl.com/c8c3q4

Look at the buckled column in the photo linked below. That's the
sort of gradual bending and sagging that would be caused by
*extreme* heat. Of course, the fires in WTC7 never even got that
hot.

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/fire/SCI-3-6.jpg

Photo from:http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/fire/SCI.htm

Tell us how you think WTC7 could suddenly drop at the rate of free
fall while simultaneously bending, crushing and breaking up its steel
frame - a steel frame that was engineered to support several times its
own weight and withstand hurricane force wind loads and mild earth
quakes. Do you understand that free fall can only occur when a falling
object encounters no significant resistance? Tell us how you imagine all
the steel columns lost all their strength in an instant. We know that
gradual, random weakening from minor office fires can't cause that, and
we also know that most of the steel frame wasn't even exposed to fire.






Videos from:http://www.911speakout.org/






--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org

 

-snip-

Take it up with your president, Ahmadinejad:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/09/23/world/main6894683.shtml

He could use a pen pal.

 

And yet another helpless, deluded, Cave Man conspiracy kook
goes tits up when its challenged to read and think. Wow,
whatta surprise...


--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org