Or not. [URL]http://tinyurl.com/y5hnf3[/URL] Check out the last picture - a genuine LOL here.
It, err, caught me by surprise is all. I was expecting something a little less like a 9R parked in a GRP front end.
It has merits for a bike rider who can't ride bikes anymore (my pal who broke his back, for instance) or for someone who wants, but can't afford something like the Ariel Atom. It has "some" potential I reckon. It's the arse end that lets it down, for certain. -- Beav VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
Beav says... Is it ok to call it by a female name then? -- Lozzo Triumph Daytona 955i SE (Black with added black bits) GSF600SW (broked) 'I do not object to people looking at their watches when I am speaking. But I strongly object when they start shaking them to make certain they are still going.' William Norman Birkett, 1st Baron Birkett, Oct 1960.
No it isn't. I can applaud the concept, but it looks like a bike has been rammed up the chuff of a single-seat racing car caught at the lights. I think a little more thought in the design and detail stages could easily have produced a simple to build trike, with a bike rear end all clothed in GRP and a single seat front end offering driver accommodation. I mean, FFS, take the bloody seats off and extend the GRP shrouding over the tank and blend it into the bike rear plastics at least. Having said that, the addition of the lights to the front end looks gash - the pod lights on the aerofoils at the front and especially the single headlight look bloody awful. The rear indicators would struggle to pass SVA as they're mounted too far forward from the rearmost point to my eyes.
Oh dear; what a cack back end idea. I've seen similar with much better rear ends. Still, it's good for an additional passenger if anyone was daft enough to use it.
