[QUOTE] How's that?[/QUOTE] much better.
26 x 7 x 1.5 = 273 - the CBX gets in, then. -- | ___ Salad Dodger |/ \ _/_____\_ GL1500SE-V/CBR1100XX-X/CBX1000Z |_\_____/_| ..76331.../...19254.../..30836. (>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 |__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 \ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4 \|^|/ ANORAK#17 IbB#4 PM#5 WG* '^' RBR Clues: 29 Pts: 485 Miles: 1967
I dunno about "odd few" - I think there's several more than that. Ages and ages ago, I went to the meeting where Bob Currie (OLABM) was trying to set up FOHMA [1]. There was a representative of one club [2] who went ranting on about how the VJMC shouldn't be allowed to join - just clubs for British bikes - and if the VJMC was in, then his club wouldn't join. Howsumdiver, I reckon most there were of the opinion that if the rest of his club were anything like him, then we'd gladly wave him goodbye and welcome the Japanese owners. [1] Federation of Historic Motorcycle Associations - it was meant to be a bit like what the FBHVC does today, 'cept bikes only. It all came to naught. [2] Scott Owners Club
Andy Wegg was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever: Very much so - the main work my CB450 needed is cosmetic, plus undoing the damage done to the wiring loom by some previous owner. Mechanically it's still fine after 25k miles, doesn't leak oil and starts first or second kick if/when the electrics are hooked up.
The Z200's gotta squeak in too. 25 x 4 (minimum - if a CB500T gets 3) x 1.5 (Hey, it's a Frankfurt bike)
Thus spake unto the assembled multitudes: Must admit the only old Brit bike that I still drool over is the DBD34 Gold Star. Handsome beast that was. Handsome bloody prices now, too. :-(
Well it is flawed: "After 50 years, almost any old shit gets in."[/QUOTE] Well, it's like antiques. Almost any old shit over 100 years old gets 'antique' status; doen't magically transform a product that was a piece of shit in 1899 into something truly wonderful - it's just an antique POS with a value dictated by its 'collectability' more than anything else.
Nope. In fact, the only Jap four engine I personally have had to take apart was one of my GSs when it hit 150,000 and that was simply tired rings. The bores and pistons, when mic'd up, were like new. There was a gearbox fault, true, but that was the PO's habit of doing clutchless changes in a hamfooted fashion that caused that. I have a 200,000 mile GS engine here that's never been apart and runs like a sweetie.
Grimly Curmudgeon says... My old Honda CB250RS single 4-stroke is just coming up to 200,000 miles on the clock. It had a rebore at 120,000 miles on the old engine, which blew up at 180,000 miles through my not checking or ever changing the oil in 25K miles. I love Jap bikes, show me any Brit bike that could withstand that level of abuse and stay as reliable.
not sure the CB500T should get 3/10 for "how good when new"... -- Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that "Chuck didn't reply, so George swung round in his saddle. He could just see Chuck's face, a white oval turned toward the sky. 'Look,' whispered Chuck, and George lifted his eyes to heaven. (There is always a last time for everything.) Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out" Arthur C. Clarke, "The 9 billion names of God"
I reckon the CB500T is a misunderstood and unfairly maligned bike. Decent shocks, progressive fork springs, flattish bars and reasonably sympathetic maintenance would get the best out of one. That and replacing the World's Ugliest Exhaust Component with an unobtrusive bit of pipe...
I dunno, 0.3 sounds about right. -- | ___ Salad Dodger |/ \ _/_____\_ GL1500SE-V/CBR1100XX-X/CBX1000Z |_\_____/_| ..76331.../...19254.../..30836. (>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 |__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 \ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4 \|^|/ ANORAK#17 IbB#4 PM#5 WG* '^' RBR Clues: 29 Pts: 485 Miles: 1967
You're just as bad as TOG. Fair enough, judged by the standards of the day, the CB500T was pretty grim, but nowadays it's just an amiable old heap with faux-classic looks, mellowed by age and slipping gracefully into a more tolerant classification. The CB500T was also Honda's one millionth motorcycle, and was ridden off the production line by Soichiro himself. On the plus side, was it not a CB500T that had TOG practically squeaking with rage and frustration? No bike that can achieve that can be all bad.
And Niall, iirc. Didn't it have a 19" tube in an 18" tyre? -- | ___ Salad Dodger |/ \ _/_____\_ GL1500SE-V/CBR1100XX-X/CBX1000Z |_\_____/_| ..76331.../...19254.../..30836. (>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 |__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 \ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4 \|^|/ ANORAK#17 IbB#4 PM#5 WG* '^' RBR Clues: 29 Pts: 485 Miles: 1967
of course, we could raise the threshold value. I'm not convinced that 100 is necessarily high enough. Take an excellent but boring machine, such as say the CBR600 - it rates at least 8 or 9 for "how good when new" judged against its peers (by all accounts) but that lets it into classic status at not much more than 10 years old. I wonder if a threshold value of say 140 wouldn't work better, that way good-but-boring stuff has to be older. Something equally good but interesting can still get in earlier by the special interest multiplier: Something such as a Benelli SEi for example, would get a SIM of say 1.5 at least which would get it in by 10 years old, probably.
That wasn't really my point. What I can't undersatnd from your wibblings is why, when I was 17, there were no viable British learner 250 machines, but there were when you were 17, despite you being younger than me. Perhaps you lived in an alternative timezone, either that or your mates found NVT's stepthrough model sexy. -- Dan L (Oldbloke) My bike 1996 Kawasaki ZR1100 Zephyr M'boy's bike 2003 Honda NSR125R (Going) Spare Bike 1990 Suzuki TS50X (Patio Ornament) BOTAFOT #140 (KotL 2005), X-FOT#000, DIAABTCOD #26, BOMB#18 (slow)
Thus spake Lozzo unto the assembled multitudes: I remember back in the 1970s misguided souls would bang on about Brit bikes being able to "cruise all day at the ton". At first I believed them but quickly realised that it simply wasn't true, and the Japanese fours they, and admittedly I at the time, dismissed as wear-out-and-throw-away rubbish were easily capable of this, if you could find any road long enough that is.
Thus spake Dan L unto the assembled multitudes: Aaarg, who can ever forget that ghastly Norton advert in the bike press, with the 850 Commando and the NVT Easy Rider moped side-by-side, with the words something like "850 Commando: the continuing legend. Easy Rider: start of another." I knew there and then that this was the work of desperate advertising execs and that both bikes, and NVT itself were doomed.