What if?

Discussion in 'Motorcycle Racing' started by Julian Bond, Jun 23, 2004.

  1. Julian Bond

    Davide Tosi Guest

    Well the '50s and '60s bikes were for sure much slower than today's rides
    and of course they were all 4-strokes, but they were also much much more
    difficult to control not just than today's 4-strokes but also than the '80s
    and '90s champions of Julian's list. Also, while all the riders in the
    Roberts-Doohan period used to race their GPs on tracks, the guys in the
    Duke-Ago era rode a lot on road circuits, where apart from the much higher
    life risk, the tarmac conditions were much worst and the tires were very
    far from nowadays, managing to have a good grip with those tires on that
    road tarmac is a task much more difficult than anything more recent riders
    had to deal with.
    And the guts. It is still a factor nowadays, Katoh's tragic death reminded
    it to us all. But can you compare it with the times in which some riders
    died almost at any GP? For instance, in 1951, 6 of the top Italian bikers
    died in about 3 months, including reigning 250s World Champion Dario
    Ambrosini. And in the early '70s riders were still falling like flies in
    trap road races like Opatja's. Roberts and his followers were also lucky
    enough to arrive in the WC when things were finally changing for better in
    terms of riders safety.
     
    Davide Tosi, Jun 24, 2004
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Nothing against KRSR, but I don't think you're giving Rossi enough
    credit. In Faster, Burgess said that when he first started working with
    Rossi that he knew Rossi had been well trained during his formidable
    racing years. This seems to indicate that Rossi has a very good
    understanding of how the bike works, how to make it better, and most
    importantly, communicating with the engineers in a useful way.

    After watching Faster this past weekend with my friend, we sort of came
    to the conclusion that Rossi on talent alone isn't a second a lap faster
    than everybody else. He just prepares half a second per lap better than
    everybody else. That is, he's so professional and so well prepared that
    he doesn't put himself at a disadvantage. We see the exact same thing
    with Michael Schumacher in F1. As the infamous basketball coach Bobby
    Knight puts it, "The will to win isn't as important as the will to
    prepare to win." What sets the champions apart from the fast riders is
    the will to prepare because everybody in the paddock has the will to
    win.
     
    Jiann-Ming Su, Jun 24, 2004
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Quite agree.
    Rossi is as charismatic and popular as Barry Sheene was. He brings something
    more to our favorite sport. If you go on any European GP you will see half
    of the crowd with Rossi color . Every Honda dealer sell the Rossi cap or
    T-shirt. As will do now Yamaha.
    On the sport side it is always a quite stupid exercise trying to compare
    different champion from different era but just look at his palmares and
    remember he's only 24. For me only Roberts hit the top as he created the
    modern era.
     
    pierre bonneau, Jun 24, 2004
    #23
  4. Is that to-stroke vs four-stroke thing really an issue at all? I mean, yes,
    mr. "I'm the fastest" sqid going from one to the other would lock up the
    rear on a big V-twin or go straight forward into his first turn on a small 2
    stroke but tallented guys with so much "feel" should not have much of a
    problem?
    I found going from a Honda V-twin 996 to an Aprilia 250 quite easy. A few
    laps and I was only consentrating on finding the maximum powerband. Even
    doing a step in at an endurance race on a 600 a couple of years later never
    bothered me at all. There were other issues with the behaviour that were
    more troublesome than weight and power. Sure, to race at top level it takes
    more but non the less.... Can't help thinking that the any guys failure in
    trasition is just another bad excuse for not delivering.

    /MBE
     
    Morten Becker-Eriksen, Jun 24, 2004
    #24
  5. Julian Bond

    Ed Light Guest

    Aha! Just like 'Oilwood!

    --
    Ed Light

    Smiley :-/
    MS Smiley :-\

    Send spam to the FTC at

    Thanks, robots.
     
    Ed Light, Jun 25, 2004
    #25
  6. Julian Bond

    Bill Smith Guest

    When you look at results over the years, I don't think 2 stroke vs 4
    stroke experience has much to do with it. Some riders have the ability
    to adapt and some don't. Adaptation is required constantly as
    technology evolves and the difference in the characteristics between 2
    and 4 strokes is fairly minor by comparison. The ones who can do it;
    we all know their names.

    Roberts (SR) credits his mile dirt track experience for the change he
    made in GP racing. Nobody in Europe steered with the throttle before
    him, now everyone does. I don't know how long he did this, but toward
    the end of his career he was teaching some of the European riders on
    his ranch using 100 CC dirt bikes, how to slide the front wheel and
    steer with the throttle. One needs very good tires for this in road
    racing and when he first went to the GPs he had Goodyear in tow
    willing to do the R&D build him whatever the hell he wanted. Goodyear
    said, at the time, that he was the only rider in the business that
    could immediately find the limit on anything they could come up with
    and ride right on it all day.

    Bill Smith
     
    Bill Smith, Jun 25, 2004
    #26
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.