What duz Ping mean

My reader must be broke again.. LOL.. Nah.. it's those damn circles you
always try to run in, when you are getting some heat for your ridiculous
nonsense..

 

No...**** you, and your Dad. You both bring it on yourselves.

 

hmmm.. I know you have been offline for a few days, so here's this
lightweight from reeky.. <grin> Started off as a high profile Blue Chip
comapany professional and wound up this morning "interviewing" for jobs..
Wow... Some of these dudes have problems, don't they ?

 

hehehe.. The boy is obviously having some problems.. I've been calling him a
lying little shit since he commenced all that $125,000 to $200,000 a year
carryin' on.. The big tip off was when he was crying about some kind of
problem with a $10,000 motorcycle in his budget.. LOL.. He's been crying and
slinging snot ever since about me calling him a liar and wanting to know
what I am calling him a liar about.. sheesh.. He really needs to get himself
a job of SOME kind.. That $300,000 house that he keeps fantasizing about is
getting more far fetched..

Especially when he slipped up and posted about all his job interviews,
lately.. WTF is all that ?

 

I'll have you know .. Nurick and Chris/chorbewhats his face don't lie.. The
extrapolate or something like that.. Now.. you take that back.. ROTFL

 

No, no, no. I never said TCP and ICMP were peers. Again, I said... Now pay
attention here... FROM A LAYMAN'S PERSPECTIVE (you DO understand those
words, right?) they are *FUNCTIONALLY* equivalent. You "ping" a destination
address, which fires off ICMP packets to verify validity and existence of an
end point. So... To a user... TO A USER... PINGing and ICMPing is
*FUNCTIONALLY* equivalent.

Doesn't change the fact he's a fucking whacko.

 

Again... I never said they were direct peers or any other words you've used
to misquote me. It's right there... "FUNCTIONALLY" the same. You said I said
"A" and I really said "B". THAT is the distinction I'm pointing out to you.
You just don't understand the fact that I'm bother because you said I said
something that I didn't.

Tell him not to be such an asshat. It's simple.

 

I'm lost now. What did he or you ask me that I haven't directly answered.
I've answered everything directly and truthfully. Not my fault you asshats
don't believe or understand answers you're given.

Really, man.


--

 

It is just *amazing* how bad your reading comprehension is. I said that I'm
currently, gainfully employed. What I also said that over the last several
months, I've interviewed at 9 places, 3 of which resulted in job offers (in
the last 4 months or so) that I turned down. Hmm... Thinking about it now,
it's a little longer... One of them was in late January. Sorry for the
mistake. Fine... In 6-ish months, I've received 3 offers, not 4 months. The
other 2 were more recent.

Go back and read, cupcake. You'll see what I wrote.

--

 

I responded in another thread. Again for the slow witted among you.

I'm employed. I looked at several other jobs. I received 3 offers. I turned
them down to remain where I am.

It's all there in black and white (or whatever font colors you use).

Asshat.


--

 

You're right. I don't lie. No need to. Better things to do with my life.

--

 

hehehe.. Sure has been putting it on your lying little ass, too.. huh,
Skippy ? How's all that successful interviewing goin'?

 

Yeah.. you sure did, Skippy.. Then you went over the deep end .. By the time
you got through with it, you were questionably a high schoold graduate,
employed by a Blue Chip with no credentials to support your claims of that
fantastic salary and the bonuses you were bragging about

What I also said that over the last several

Something is wrong, here, Skippy... Blue Chips demand a lot more from the
employees in the position you've been describing.. At Pep Boys, you can run
around doing all that interviewing and they aren't aware, nor do they care..
That Blue Chip would fire your ass in a heartbeat, as soon as they find out
you are interviewing.. For the position you describe, they demand complete
loyalty, especially with the kind of money you've been bragging about..
Don't **** with me, lightweight.. I spent years hiring and firing pipsqueaks
like you..

3 of which resulted in job offers (in

You better quit turning all those job offers down, lightweight.. The
industry that you claim to be getting all those offers from has really been
hard pressed since Bush went to Washington.. Everybody but you and Nurick
seems to know that..

Hmm... Thinking about it now,

Whew.. just can't resist, can you.. Lightweight ?

Done read it, Skippy.. I'm the one that's got you dancing around and trying
to clean up your mess.. LOL

 

There you go with definitions, again... Sheesh.. I was trying to give you
some kind of benefit with all that "extrapolating" stuff.. Damn,
Lightweight.. you don't know when you are well of.. You sure that you aren't
Albert Nurick in disguise ? ROTFL

 

<chuckle> I read that, lightweight.. That's as unbelievable as all that
salary and bonus stuff you tried to use to clean up your mess, that you'd
made... hehe..

 

he'd have to find me first, since i sure wouldn't be in his fan base.

 

perhaps he's trying to say that, without line numbers and GOTOs, it
can't be a programming language? but that's just a guess.