What duz Ping mean

"Result" of what ? A requiest for a tax review ? ROTFL.. That's terribly
funny.. gawd damn.. You clowns neither one have ever Closed on property..
You don't even know the difference between liabilities and debits.. sheesh..
Keep digging, Lightweight.. that hole is getting too damn deep for either
one of you to see out of.. LOL

 

gosh Bill, that wasn't very snappy, now was it. Aren't getting tired of
being the puppet are you ? Well, you can't stop, you're obsessed by
thoughts planted in your head by other people. LOL.[/QUOTE]

Dance away.. fat boy.. See you this weekend.. LOL

 

Three three outcomes I posted from his appeal are all true, and
they're all benefits for him. You still haven't said what you'd have
done different.

And now you're calling me a liar, claiming that *I* don't even own a
house. This just keeps getting better and better.

 

Like a stopped watch that's correct twice a day, Bill has actually
stumbled into one true statement in that paragraph. I *didn't* attend
the closing on my house. On the closing date, I was in the middle of
a two-month counter-drug detachment with my squadron in Puerto Rico.
Before I left, I had to sign a general power-of-attorney for my wife
so that she could sign the closing documents in my place. In
addition, on the day of closing, I had to fax an "alive and well"
letter on squadron letterhead to the closing agent to prove that I was
still alive and that the power-of-attorney I had signed before I left
was still valid.

So technically, Bill's right - I didn't attend the closing for my
house.

 

He mentioned the appraisal that he had to get done when he appealed to
the tax board, right from the start. It was that appraisal that let
him know the market value of his house had increased $30k. I guess
you missed it.

 

No, whenever I've mentioned "appraisal", I've meant "appraisal", not
the tax "assessment" that's usually just some formula that's applied
to the original purchase price to "guesstimate" the current value of
the house.

"appraisal"...."assessment". Try to keep them straight.

 

ROTFL... If I had a bone with you, Scott.. you'd have known about it, a long
time ago.. I sure wouldn't have come at you under the cover of being
neutral. Some of the posts you've made regarding yourself is well open for
criticism..

I don't care what you own or don't own.. that seems to be hard for you to
grasp.. I didn't have to call you a "liar".. you are pretty well backing
yourself in that corner, yourself.. The "better and better" threshold was
reached a long time ago.. You and your newest and bestest friend are trying
desperately to get out of the hole that you both have gotten into.. Stop
digging.. that's simple..

 

I'll disregard the main gist of this one.. Why didn't you just say that
you'd never attended a Closing, instead of all the usenet dancing that
you've been doing ? I already knew that, when I commenced mentioning
"closings" several days ago, or whenever it was.. Your newest, bestest
friend, Chris is still so pumped up to "get the goods" on the Walkers, he
can't get past the point that he's been sucker punched.. You were too..
LOL.. The fool is still trying to convince that he's for real... What a
hoot..

 

LOL.. That must have been included somewhere that he was addressing all the
"Closing" comments that he is totally ignorant about.. hmmm Guess he's still
Googling, huh ? How come it takes him so much longer than you ?

 

ROTFL... yeah.. that's how it goes when you Google.. Sometimes things just
escape you.. <grin> The real world is another place and entirely different
than usenet..

You can bet your phoney little ass, that anyone that has challenged a tax
appraisal knows exactly what the difference is .. If you'd ever attended a
property Closing, you would know.. It's all explained to you in detail..
Liabilities as well as the Assets that are entailed in the property.. There
are also costs and charges that are detailed and qualified.. ROTFL... FOOL..

 

It's more funny than unsettling. I don't have the history with the
Walkers that Nurick, Moran, and others on this group have, but that
doesn't stop them from lumping me in with them whenever I point out a
logical or mathematical problem with one of their posts. I've never
gone off on name-calling tirades, insulted their families, blamed
Brian for the unfortunate, untimely death of his daughter, made
outlandish claims about my income, work history, or housing situation,
or challenged anyone to a fist-fight, gun-fight, or a display of
riding skills. I've wrecked a motorcycle, but I didn't try to blame
my bike or anyone else but myself. I've also never posted under an
alias during the eleven years I've been participating on Usenet, and
the return e-mail addresses on my posts are always current and
correct.

Everything I've ever said on this newsgroup has been the truth, but
according to Bill, I'm an "asshole", a "phony", "one of the two
biggest dumbasses on Usenet", and now I find out that I don't even
own a house!

My conscience is completely clear when it comes to what I post here,
so I'm not bothered at all by what the Walkers say about me.
Sometimes amazed, and often amused, but not bothered.

 

Cite one.

That doesn't stop you from claiming that I'm lying about owning a
house, or claiming that I'm living in "subsidized housing" (Does
receiving a housing allowance from the Navy as part of my pay and
benefits count as "subsidized"?).

Again, please cite an example. My work history? My education? My
income? My housing situation? The bikes I own? Pray tell.

 

ROTFL... That's what I call usenet dancing when someone has slipped up
pretty badly, Scott.. I haven't gotten anything confused.. you have.. and
this Chris idiot..
Your explanation that you were deployed and not able to attend the Closing
is somewhat of a reasonable excuse and you admitted that you'd not attended
a Closing..

Trying to turn it around, now.. isn't impressing anyone but another
Wal-Mart/Usenet Shopper .. Transferring property isn't comparable to a
vehicle transfer, Scott.. Forget it.. Real Estate transactions are an
entirely different world where Realtors licenses are involved as well as a
lot of people who are bonded have to be considered.. Any agent who'd preside
over a Closing with two morons like you guys have indicated that you are,
would promptly lose their licenses and bonds revoked.. It isn't criminal,
but it is damned sure a loss of livelihood for those people.. The Closings
are designed to protect the buyer, seller and all those parties who are
slightly involved in the process.. Yep.. my original impressions of both you
guys are that you have never bought or sold property and are only determined
to make someone look foolish.. As a result of that determination, you both
look like idiots.. Thanks ..

 

Because for all intents and purposes, I *have* done a closing. I
looked at the paperwork before I went to Puerto Rico, my name and/or
initials are on every page (put there by my wife as per the
power-of-attorney), and I have a copy of the closing paperwork right
next to me in my filing cabinet.

To use the fact that I wasn't physically present on the day of the
closing as claim that I have no experience with house closings would
be silly and deceptive. I only mentioned the fact that I wasn't
physically there because I thought it was funny that buried in your
lie was the technical truth that I didn't attend my closing in person.

 

Sounds great! Of course, you'll want my work history, educational
history, and current salary before you rent to me. No problem. I'm
only 35 years old, and I never graduated from grade school. I make
$900,000/year as a theoretical physicist at Los Alamos, where I've
worked for sixty years, and I sit next to the guy that invented String
Cheese! Good enough? Let's make a deal!

 

Closing costs have nothing to do with this discussion. He paid them
when he closed on the house, and they're done with. His problem was
with the re-assessment (NOT appraisal) that the tax assessor's office
came up with a year later. That kind of stuff happens all the time.
The tax assessor around here re-assesses (NOT appraises) the value of
my home every year. If he suddenly assessed it (NOT appraised it) at
$600,000, I'd appeal it with him. The closing costs and assessment at
the time of my closing back in 1999 would have nothing to do with it.

As part of the appeal regarding the "tax ASSESSMENT", I'd have to pay
someone to do "an APPRAISAL" to prove that my house wasn't really
worth $600,000. Again, what I signed at closing or paid in closing
costs would have nothing to do with the annual re-ASSESSMENTS that the
tax ASSESSOR does.

I've tried to be very clear with my terms, because every time you
talke about a "tax appraisal", it makes you look even sillier.

 

That pretty well sums it up, alright.. Several points that you have gone off
on, though.. With all due respect, I've repeatedly expressed surprise that
you'd become involved in these silly usenet games, I've even asked you to
stay out of the ones where you seemed to insist .. This one, you really
waded into, even though I pointed out how stupid this entire discussion has
been..

You repeatedly ignored my concern that you would engage .. No one but you,
is responsible for your involvement and no one but you is responsible for
the outcome of your involvement..

You continually ignored my comments to the effect that I could care less
about what you own or what that idiot, who claims he is in the Philadelphia,
owns.. None of that was of importance to you, or him.. At any given time,
you could have gracefully withdrawn from the discussion because it was
obviously his focused agenda to discredit and/or embarrass someone.. You
persisted in engaging..

Neither of you halfwits can claim with a straight face that the Walkers
victimized you and/or mistreated you in any way.. Forget it.. You did it to
yourself, both of you.. I'll give you credit hmmm No I won't .. You brought
every damned bit of this on yourself, Scott.. quit your freakin' whining
about it .. Take it from here to wherever you want to.. And that's a
gracious offer.. from me to you..

Bill Walker

 

STFU.. you witless little, usenet freak.. You've caused a pretty decent man
to humiliate himself by trying to defend your juvenile bullshit.. You aren't
even smart enough to realize he has shown more man in that one post than you
have shown since you've been posting on usenet..

 

There's nothing that his Realtor, the seller's Realtor, or Chris could
have done at the closing last year to keep his property from being
mis-assessed by the tax assessor further down the road. Just like
there's nothing that my realtor could have done in 1999 that would
keep my house from being mis-assessed next year.

The truth is, I own a house and have owned it since 1999, and I don't
see anything in Chris' description of his housing experience to
suggest that he doesn't own a house as well. YOU'RE the one claiming
that Chris got a "tax appraisal" (which would be worthless if one even
existed), when in fact he plainly stated he got an *appraisal*, not an
*assessment* in order to resolve his dispute with the tax board.

But you are right in that I've never SOLD property. As I said before,
I rented until 1999, and I haven't sold this house yet. I did
re-finance it in 2002 when the interest rates dropped significantly,
but that's it.

 

No need.. I served in the Navy, also.. I'm still very active in veteran's
advocacy groups.. Leave it alone..

Just leave it alone, Scott.. We really don't need to go there..

Just leave it alone, Scott.. We don't have to do it, this way.. I've also
got a very valid e-mail address.. See you later.. OK