upgrade ideas for CM450E

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by David Allen Trimm, Jun 3, 2004.

  1. I would like to upgrade some things on my '82 Honda CM450E. I am thinking
    of putting front and rear disc brakes on. I figure that I am going to need
    a donor front fork and swingarm for the correct mountings. Anyone knows
    what fits that frame?

    Dave
     
    David Allen Trimm, Jun 3, 2004
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. David Allen Trimm

    Mark Olson Guest

    *ding*

    Putting a rear disk on a CM450E would be pointless. The standard
    drum brake is plenty good. You *could* get the necessary parts
    from a donor CM400T/CM450T to do the front disk conversion, but
    you'll still have a fairly bland commuter bike when you're done.
    If you want real performance, sell it, and use the time and money
    you would have spent on upgrading the CM450E toward a worthier bike,
    with better engine and suspension, like an EX500.
     
    Mark Olson, Jun 3, 2004
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. I see your points. Guess I just liked the bike too much. I like the
    weight, and ride. I had an accident a number of years ago, and was faulted
    by drum brakes. I like the 48-55 mpg I get with this bike, and wanted to
    fix it up for the long haul...

    Dave
     
    David Allen Trimm, Jun 3, 2004
    #3
  4. David Allen Trimm

    Mark Olson Guest

    Don't get me wrong- I have a CM400T, which is the same bike as the
    CM450E, except you've got an extra 50cc and a drum front brake vs. disk
    on the 'T' model. It's a fun bike to ride, comfy, and reasonably
    good handling. But as a starting point for a project bike, forget it-
    there are *much* better bikes out there in nearly every way.

    I would make sure the front drum brake is _perfect_, new shoes if
    needed, new brake cable, and everything adjusted properly. If it's
    set up right, it might even be a better brake than the woefully
    uninspiring disk on the 'T' model.
     
    Mark Olson, Jun 3, 2004
    #4
  5. David Allen Trimm

    John Johnson Guest

    I've got a VFR 750 ('94) and got 49mpg on my last tank (it was much
    highway riding) and have been getting mid-40's on the last couple. While
    a plastic-covered sport-tourer may not be for you, you can still get
    good mileage out of a newer bike.

    If I were looking at a new model, the Suzuki SV 650 is awfully
    attractive. The SV has a racing class, so aftermarket upgrade parts are
    plentiful, it's not too large, not much plastic, the S-model has a
    windscreen. It's not too expensive, IIRC. Modern chassis and brakes,
    reliable electrics (big change from earlier Suzuki's! ;-). If you can
    find one used you should think hard about it. If I hadn't been looking
    specifically for a VFR, I would probably have landed there. Heck, if the
    V-Strom 650 had been out when I was looking, I might very well have
    gotten one instead of the VFR.

    Just a thought, if you are looking for a new direction.

    ps Triumph bikes look pretty nice to me, but there aren't any dealers in
    my region; otherwise I'd be looking at them, too.

    --
    Later,
    John



    'indiana' is a noun. Leave only the noun between @ and .edu to reply
     
    John Johnson, Jun 3, 2004
    #5
  6. David Allen Trimm

    Dwarf8 Guest

    If you like the bike enough, the money doesn't really matter.
    If that bike is "your baby", then go for it!
    It might not be someone else's perfect ride but who gives a $hit?
    Just remember, you'll never get your money back out and you're doing it for
    love instead for any sort of investment.

    I have been fixing up old Yamaha 250 singles for a bit and I get real
    pleasure from getting them "right" but it's a labour of love and nothing
    more.
    D8
    GS850G
    SR 250s
     
    Dwarf8, Jun 4, 2004
    #6

  7. i have an 03 triumph sprint st. when i took it in for the 500 mile
    maintenance last week (its a carry over) i rode at about 95 mph the
    whole way - only 80 miles (a small hop for this bike, i am learning).
    any way, i got 40 mpg on that trip. coming back yesterday, i had
    about the same conditions, but i didn't tuck up tight on the tank as i
    now had a set of panniers and a tail trunk on it, and saw no point to
    it, but rode just as fast. i haven't filled yet, so no idea on the
    mileage, but it is at least what it was without all the touring gear
    on. i actually think that it used less fuel. i think they maybe had
    the computer set to a rich fuel profile for the initial break in.

    matt n
     
    matt neumiller, Jun 5, 2004
    #7
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.