TL1000R (EBAY)

W-reg (2000)

7300 miles on the clock

Selling due to nagging wife.

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI....2658307&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW#ebayphotohosting

 

You spineless, *spineless* ****!!

 

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Gary

Hmmm... Interesting high bidder ID ATM. "felchingisgood".

There's a 'feedback' joke to be done here, but I'm not the man to do it.

Oh, and I echo the thoughts of Brother Sorby.

 

"felchingisgood"

From: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=felching
"In retrospect, lighting the match was my big mistake. But I was only trying
to retrieve the gerbil," Eric Tomaszewski told bemused doctors in the
Severe Burns Unit of Salt Lake City Hospital. Tomaszewski, and his
homosexual partner Andrew "Kiki" Farnum, had been admitted for emergency
treatment after a felching session had gone seriously wrong. "I pushed a
cardboard tube up his rectum and slipped Raggot, our gerbil, in," he
explained. "As usual, Kiki shouted out "Armageddon", my cue that he'd had
enough. I tried to retrieve Raggot but he wouldn't come out again, so I
peered into the tube and struck a match, thinking the light might attract
him."

At a hushed press conference, a hospital spokesman described what happened
next. "The match ignited a pocket of intestinal gas and a flame shot out the
tube, igniting Mr Tomaszewski's hair and severely burning his face. It also
set fire to the gerbil's fur and whiskers which in turn ignited a larger
pocket of gas further up the intestine, propelling the rodent out like a
cannonball."

Tomaszewski suffered second degree burns and a broken nose from the impact
of the gerbil, while Farnum suffered first and second degree burns to his
anus and lower intestinal tract.

 

Learn to fucking post, eh?

Incompetent fool.

 

That's the reason they invented shovels and patios, surely?

 

Learn to fucking post, eh?

Go on then - tell me what was wrong with my post?

 

"> >> Learn to fucking post, eh?

Who said that?

 

Do the words "attribution line" mean anything to you?

 

Myabe she's nagging him to get something faster?

 

Do the words "attribution line" mean anything to you?

Actually, they didn't really. But after googling for it, I presume you are
inferring that on each post of mine, I indicate at the top whose post I am
replying to?

However, in both the original post and this post, surely that information
isn't required? The post is self-standing, in-so-far as it explains the text
I am replying to and my reply. I wasn't replying to a particular person, I
was addressing a point and elaborating on it.

I've been using newsgroups for over 10 years and you're the first person to
point this out to me, perhaps it's a quirk of this newsgroup. I'm well aware
of top posting, and I can see the logical reason for this, and snipping,
etc.

As it happens, Outlook Express kindly gave me this text when I clicked
reply:


Does this help? If so, can you let me know how knowing it was Pip changes
the context of my post?

Cheers.

 

Still enjoying your job at Relate then?

 

Still nagging isn't it?

Bury her under the patio or trade her in for a quieter and more
efficient model.

 

www.squarepeginaroundhole.com

 

Heh. That might be fun, where do I apply?

 

It's broken... Well, that saves me one job at least.

 

*splutter*

I can always count on you to make me laugh out loud.

TA.

 

....at the hypocrisy. Coming, as it did, from a bloke that sold his bike just
to feed his kids.

FFS

 

ah, but this is my whole point, I wasn't referencing anyone in particular in
my original post, however, I now am, so I've left it in this time.

 

Surely if you are not referencing anything in a previous post, you
should be starting a new thread, by definition?