Titanium? a Q for the metalurically inclined...

Discussion in 'Motorbike Technical Discussion' started by pete, Mar 26, 2005.

  1. pete

    pete Guest

    You see it mentioned all over the place, Suzuki (and others) use Titanium
    valves in some of their motors, there is even....holy crap, muffler parts...
    made out of it...

    I was doing some googling, you can find this property of elemental Titanium
    around..."Titanium burns in air and is the only element that burns in
    nitrogen" Holy crap, sounds like a great thing to make valves out of to me,
    especially exhaust valves ;o)

    We actually use Titanium fasteners at work for certain things, they are
    quite pricey, eg an M6 x long enough SHCS is about $6 ea. (I don't know
    specifically what the alloy is )

    Someone brought in a chunk of this stuff once at work for an R&D effort,
    again I don't know specifically what the alloy was, it looked and felt like
    Aluminum, but the guys tried to machine it , it was kinda like...maybe the
    leaf spring out of your car.

    So, what's the real scoop on Titanium? Is anything "titanium" you buy for
    your bike actually really "titanium" ??

    D.
     
    pete, Mar 26, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. pete

    John Johnson Guest

    What is the ignition temperature? Lots of parts of your bike burn in air.
    Sure. Plenty of parts are Titanium, though I couldn't tell you what
    alloys are used. Honda's RC30 used Titanium con rods. You find it used
    in places where weight is a factor: valves, con rods, sometimes valve
    springs. In chasing ultimate lightening within the limits of certain
    racing classes, one might replace stock fasteners with Titanium. This
    sort of action is at the lower end of the 'bang-for-buck' scale, but if
    it's a legal advantage and you've got the money and have already done
    everything else...
     
    John Johnson, Mar 26, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. pete

    Mark Hickey Guest

     
    Mark Hickey, Mar 26, 2005
    #3
  4. That's interesting. I worked in the test lab of a company that made
    stainless steel and titanium pneumatic ducting for aerospace. We had a
    well-equipped shop to make test fixtures...

    I thought that the reason for using heliarc to weld titanium was to
    stop the weld from oxiding immediately. I was practicing welding scraps
    of titanium together at work. It welds very easily, flows like butter,
    almost no filler rod was needed...

    But another guy in the shop told me that titanium would spit back at
    you if your helium ran out while you were welding it. He mentioned
    another guy getting hit in the nose by a flying bit of titanium when
    that happened...
     
    krusty kritter, Mar 26, 2005
    #4
  5. pete

    Paul Cassel Guest

    ignition temp in air is 2200F. Now check your engine's temps plus
    technically it's not in air.
     
    Paul Cassel, Mar 26, 2005
    #5
  6. pete

    Mark Hickey Guest

    The real reason you HAVE to thoroughly bathe both sides of the weld in
    inert gas is that just a few molecules of oxygen or nitrogen will
    embrittle the weld... at the very least cause a noticeable
    discoloration (bluish-gray). If you welded titanium without inert
    gas, the results would be truly scary in terms of strength (or lack
    thereof). The jig that's used to weld my frames plumbs gas into the
    inside of the frame tubes, in addition to the gas from the welder that
    bathes the area being welded.

    Mark Hickey
     
    Mark Hickey, Mar 26, 2005
    #6

  7. In the 1960s, BSA made a titanium-framed competition crosser (or maybe
    enduro).

    It was a nightmare because the frame kept breaking and had to be welded
    up in a special sealed-atmospehere tank or something.

    I can't find much about it on Google, but I do remember an article in
    the UK press which reckoned it cost (in modern values, and the article
    was written in the mid-to-late 1970s) the equivalent of a quarter of a
    million pounds.

    However, BSA simply lost the cost in its accounting procedures. A
    craftsman might spend hours machining some component from solid billet,
    and the cost was "zero"....
     
    The Older Gentleman, Mar 27, 2005
    #7
  8. pete

    Ray Curry Guest

    AMA outlawed Ti frames because of it and titanium axles as well. Their
    tech inspectors used a magnet to make sure the axles were still steel in
    the early superbike days. Bad thing about Titanium is that it breaks
    from inside out. Steel and aluminum crack at the surface first so you
    can magneflux or zyglo check to check for pending failure. Titanium
    frames could pass Zyglo one second and catastrophically fail the next.
    Since the race organizers couldn't figure out how to check them safely
    they outlawed them. Now it's used in lots of pieces like Forumula 1 cars
    suspension. I haven't checked in a while but they must have developed
    some sort of Xray or sound test or just trust the process more. Ever see
    a Titanium press? It's like powder naturally but when they squeeze it
    hard enough, it can form blocks of strong metal. The splash that comes
    out of the mold vents is like metal sea foam. It's actually not very
    good in frames anyway because it has a very low Young's modulus,
    basically no spring back, so a bike frame feels dead. I was less than
    impressed with the Titanium fasteners since it seems like they have
    tensile strength but not shear. I tried allen bolts and the hex hole
    twisted out at a much lower torque than steel so I couldn't take
    advantage of the strength. Aluminum was much more practical in the low
    load bearing work that the Ti's worked in.
     
    Ray Curry, Mar 28, 2005
    #8
  9. <Snip>

    Thanks for the info. Most interesting.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Mar 28, 2005
    #9
  10. pete

    Mark Hickey Guest

    Titanium doesn't fail in any different manner than steel or aluminum
    in terms of where it fails - there's nothing I can think of that would
    cause an axle to fail from the inside out except for a void in the
    material. The reason you don't want to swap a titanium axle for a
    steel one is that while titanium is stronger per pound than steel,
    it's not going to be as strong on a volume basis. So if you design a
    new titanium axle that's larger it can be lighter and stronger than a
    steel axle - but simply replacing a steel part (which presumably has
    been designed to just barely handle the stress it's likely to see
    rather than having been radically over-designed), you're asking for
    trouble. Replace it with an aluminum part of the same size and you're
    committing suicide.
    They're certainly not worried about axles "failing from the inside
    out". Like any other material, titanium can be used to form parts up
    to nearly any task, hence its use in fighter aircraft.
    It all depends on the alloy. High-strength alloys like 6Al/4V have
    low YM, while CP (Commercially Pure) ti has much higher YM. The
    3Al/2.5V (3% aluminum, 2.5% Vanadium) alloy I use in my bicycle frames
    has a YM in between.

    As for "spring back"... if a frame doesn't "spring back" every time
    it's flexed, you're going to have a very short ride or race. The same
    mythology about the "frame feeling dead" exists in the bicycle world,
    where at least the other factor affecting the way a bike feels are a
    lot smaller (1", 120psi tires and no suspension). Throw inches of
    suspension travel, huge (by comparison) low pressure (by comparison)
    tires and a thick, wide padded saddle and I'll guarantee you couldn't
    tell a titanium frame from a steel one if they were designed for the
    same mission statement (the ti frame would have slighly larger OD
    tubes).
    If you're replacing steel fasteners with ti fasteners, you're LOWERING
    the tensile and shear strength of the bolt, not raising it (unless
    you're replacing some very low-strength steel hardware of course). If
    an aluminum bolt will survive in the application, a titanium bolt will
    be overkill, and a steel bolt even more overkill.

    Mark "I like ti" Hickey
     
    Mark Hickey, Mar 28, 2005
    #10
  11. pete

    pete Guest

    Maybe Titanium doesn't have a fatique limit, or a really low one.
    I think this is a concern with Aluminum vrs steel for parts subject to
    cyclic loading/vibration.

    Isn't the stress the result of the forces/moments acting on a part and its
    sectional properties? If so, replacing a part with an dimensionally
    identical one of a different material should produce the same stresses. The
    question might be if the new material can cope with these stresses and the
    conditions its under.

    Does this make sense?

    D.
     
    pete, Mar 28, 2005
    #11
  12. pete wrote:


    The above remark means that you don't know the difference between
    "stress" and "strain", and probably don't know about the "modulus of
    elasticity" or other ecclesiastical concepts ;-)

    And, I refuse to further discuss the theological aspects of mechanical
    engineering in an open forum where infidels may be lurking. Who knows,
    the ghost of Hoyt McKagen may not be requiescating in pacem ;-)
     
    krusty kritter, Mar 28, 2005
    #12
  13. pete

    Sean J Kelly Guest

    No, you're correct. For engineering purposes, stress is solely dependent
    on loads and geometry.

    Deflections, strain, etc are related to the material, however.

    -Sean
     
    Sean J Kelly, Mar 29, 2005
    #13
  14. pete

    Mark Hickey Guest

    That's true.
    Exactly. Theoretically any aluminum structure that's flexed a bit
    will eventually fail. The only real issue is whether it will fail
    before or after you retire the part/bike/frame.

    The other question was admirably answered by others...

    Mark Hickey
     
    Mark Hickey, Mar 29, 2005
    #14
  15. pete

    pete Guest

    Thanks Krusty, I think. I was getting ready to post a long winded reply and
    the noticed the smilelys. :eek:)

    People either know this or they don't. The YM, or E, or whatever...is like a
    spring constant for the material. It's an atomic property. You can't change
    it (much) by heat treatment, lightly alloying ect, It's use is to determine
    deflections and stuff. It doesn't appear in common stress equations because
    it's not relevent.

    I got all hot under the collar over a discussion on another NG where they
    thought changing the preload of a spring effected its "rate". The spring
    rate is a property of the material, it's "e",and it's dimensions, and has
    nothing to do with the preload. Whatsoever. Trustme :eek:).

    D.
     
    pete, Mar 29, 2005
    #15
  16. pete

    Rob Munach Guest

    Actually, Pete is correct assuming the amount of deformation is not a
    concern and you do not exceed the yield stress of the material. (I have
    not been following this thread)
    fa = P/A (axial stress)
    fb = Mc/I or M/S (bending stress)
    No need to know the modulus of elasticity, only section properties.

    The modulus of elasticity will allow you to compute the deformation
    under the computed stresses.
     
    Rob Munach, Mar 29, 2005
    #16
  17. Parts do bend, and stretch, and twist. The mechanical engineer has to
    cover all the possibilities in his design, plus make the part light
    enough to satisfy performance requirements or meet cost constraints.
    Can't sell the customer a part that is too strong, he'll never buy
    another one, the company's profits will suffer...

    Somebody once said that any fool could design a part that weighs five
    pounds to do a job, but it takes an aeronautical engineer to design a
    part that weighs 2 pounds and does the same job without a disastrous
    failure...

    Some parts can tolerate a lot of bending, and that's a good thing, when
    you're talking about the wings and fuselage of a jet airliner flying
    through turbulent air. It's fairly easy to calculate how much the wings
    of the plane in your design study can flap up and down and still return
    to their original position. The alternative would be a wing that was so
    stiff it tore off at the wing root...

    Motorcycle axles have a different requirement. They need to exhibit a
    certain rigidity. They need to be stiff. The designer wants the wheel
    to rotate in a certain plane, it's supposed to remain parallel to the
    fork tubes and the wheel is supposed to rotate perpendicular the axle.
    At least, so far as the rider can detect, to make the bike's handling
    predictable...

    And the transient accelerations working on the axle will usually be
    bending it *a very tiny amount* in the middle at whatever frequency the
    front wheel is striking the pavement irregularities while travelling at
    high speeds across rough roads. Who knows how much the axle is bending?
    How many bending cycles will it take, before it breaks? The rider can't
    tell until the bike steers "funny" and spits him onto the ground...

    There was a story told once about some open-wheeled car racers who
    weren't having any problems with the soft steel bolts that fastened
    their wheels to the hubs. But they found a supply of high strength
    aircraft fasteners built to very high military standards for the
    government. The price was right, the bolts were almost free at surplus
    prices. So the racers removed the cheap soft steel bolts and replaced
    them with the high strength bolts...

    The high strength bolts began breaking regularly. They had the
    strength, but they could withstand many deflection cycles, like the
    softer steel bolts. They were strong, but they weren't tough enough to
    take the punishment. They weren't such a good deal after all...

    Take the expen$ive titanium axle bought by a wealthy privateer just
    because he could get one from HRC in hopeful attempt to give his Honda
    just one more little "edge" over the low budget guy. Do you think he's
    going to accept limited service life, and toss the expen$ive axle into
    the trash can after one or two seasons? Nah! It cost him too much...

    So the sanctioning body has to change the rule book to keep him from
    killing himself when the axle breaks from an unsuspected flaw...

    Different high tech materials have other characteristics. Like the
    carbon fiber brake disks that would fail disastrously. They had to be
    outlawed. Heck, they worked on Formula I cars, so the motorcycle racers
    had to try them. The Formula I teams would use a set of carbon fiber
    brakes for a short time and then scrap them. A factory team racing a
    bike with carbon fiber disks might sell them to a privateer, he might
    use them a short time and then sell them to some sucker who didn't know
    about the problem with voids in the epoxy and delamination that causes
    sudden failure, like when that Airbus lost its carbon fiber vertical
    stabilizer over New Jersey, killing everybody on board...

    Well, that was blamed on "pilot error", but the vertical stabilizer did
    break off...

    What about light weight, high strength carbon fiber wheels that will
    delaminate suddenly, and shatter? Are they still legal?

    Recently I was looking at the cover of Cycle World. It shows a custom
    motorcycle with an exotic carbon fiber girder front suspension. I
    wonder how the owner of such a motorcycle is going to react when the
    engineers tell him, "Oh, by the way, your girder has a limited service
    life, it may fail disastrously if you park your motorcycle in the
    sunlight too often..."
     
    krusty kritter, Mar 29, 2005
    #17
  18. We know that titanium is lighter than steel. When engineers start
    specifying titanium parts to replace steel parts because of "fashion"
    concerns, that should be a red flag to intelligent riders. We can't do
    anything to help the truly moronic riders that are driven to buy the
    most fashionable motorcycles just because they saw some Italian guy win
    a road race on a titanium part-equipped bike though...
    used for fasteners.

    Sure, it's strong, but is it TOUGH enough to withstand repeated strain
    cycles? That's the problem, not tensile strength...
    OK, so it's light and cosmetically appealing in a situation where if it
    breaks it doesn't cause an accident, it just falls off the motorbike...
    Spelling Nazi...
    I spent a night in a bed and breakfast in Limerick once. Caught a
    dreadful cold. One of the worst i ever had...
     
    krusty kritter, Mar 29, 2005
    #18
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.