[QUOTE] Because anything Microsoft is crap?[/QUOTE] oh. But, y'know, it isn't
....which Microsoft had nowt to do with designing. DOS was an OS whose design was laid down by a company other than Microsoft, and it was much akin to (and designed to be very easy to port code from) CP/M. Now "Microsoft Bob", that's the sort of thing Bill Gates can be justly proud of.
If you're into mutual benefit, you might like to consider benefiting other users of this particularly high-volume newsgroup and in future, posting your replies below the text to which you are replying - having snipped signatures and irrelevant text. Look here: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmnetiquette.html Cheers.
If I was Bill Gates I'd be justly proud of putting a computer on virtually every office workers desk.
Please don't try and give me a history lesson on OSes, especially when you don't don't know it was actually called QDOS [1] prior to Bill stepping in. Why DR never sued them I don't know, now DR-DOS, tehre was a *very* good OS. [1] Quick and Dirty Ooperating System
Sadly, I have to agree with you, it is like Mr H.T.Ford looking at our crammed streets and roads now. Full of cheap shite, with a few decent models thrown in.
Yes, very well put Y*T*C! I agree- I >don't don't< know that, IOW I do/did know it was called QDOS. Hacked into existence by a company called Seattle Computer *mumble* or something like that. Did you think I was implying that _you_ *didn't* know that MS didn't create MS-DOS? I assumed that you being a known computo boffin, that you naturally would know that. I was pointing out that DOS was really a re-labeled OS, which I knew was called QDOS, but didn't bother to point that factoid out. Agreed. As was CP/M-86.