In Nuremburg, apparently, according to one reporter
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, raden That wasn't a Grand Prix, it was a rally. -- Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest" WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41 SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner", Honda GL1000K2 (Falling apart) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big" Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Honda ST1100 wiv trailer Norton 850 Commando
Except that it was F1 and it was at the Nuerbergring As bad as the other day when someone said that jumping 15metres off a cliff - they could reach 70mph not physically possible (on earth), is it
15 m vertically or horizontally? Neglecting air resistance, if they jumped 15 m horizontally from the top of a _50_ metre cliff they could do it with a bit to spare. -- Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________ CMS Collaboration, Brunel University. Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch] Room 40-1-B12, CERN GSX600F, RG250WD "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484 JKLO#003, 005 WP7# 3000 LC Unit #2368 (tinlc) UKMC#00009 BOTAFOT#16 UKRMMA#7 (Hon) KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".
Is that what you call lateral thinking? You could still exceed 70mph by just falling off the same cliff. Perhaps we could find a couple of scooters to test the theory.
Although not explicitly stated, implicitly implied ... Downwards, of course And I'm sure you could also work out using parabolix whether it's possible to actually jump 15m horizontally in a 50 m drop
Would not the question be to work out the initial horizontal velocity needed to jump 15M horizontally in a 50M drop?
And is that the most efficient way of doing it? What if the horizontal velocity was partically converted to an upward component at the point of take off assuming: a) Normal person; b) Olymic trained long-jumper?
You want to know the most efficient way of killing someone? It probably isn't getting them to run and jump off a 50m cliff in a vacuum.