The two# list

My car is company owned, as is Champ's and serveral other UKRM'ers -
You'll note we don't have TWO numbers.

 

maybe 'only' means something different up north?

 

Hey, had to try.

 

Ginge wrote

I was refused one for merely owning a car, despite the fact I was not
operating it. These days I am disqualified because I have access to the
car of another family member.

 

fairy snuff

 

Ben Blaney wrote

'Sa burd Ben. You know what they are like. Let her have the two# if she
wants, someone might get a blow job out of it. Not you obviously.

 

And you won't get one at all at that rate.

 

I don't want one. I'd rather have one of those numbers for lots of
wheels.

 

But the bike isn't your only transport, is it?

IMO two# is if you only own and have access to bikes.

And you own the fecking company as well!

 

Cab said...

I wouldn't apply for a two# when I had a co-cage. I did once I gave the
job and cage up though.

 

BRC said...

But you own the company anyway ffs!

 

Current ruling: If you drive exclusively for your job, using an
employer-provided vehicle, but your personal transport is a bike, you
qualify. Driving within employment doesn't count, although using it
to commute is a fail.

 

53 jsp...

And let me explain why.

On the ukrm site it states :
"The two list was started by dog for those that use two wheels only to
carry out their daily routine."

And that is me. The SV in the sig is my daily transport to and from
work. Before the SV, a bandit did the same. Before that a KH 125 and
before that a pushbike. Before that it was my feet (I lived close to
that one). It carries me to town when I go there and anywhere else I
care to travel. It carries my son to his drum lesson and occasionally
the other one to his bass lesson. It carries my daughter to her
botfriend's. It carries my wife around and about when she's with me.

There is a car in the family, but I very rarely drive it, and only when
i) I have to take more thanone person somewhere (rare), or ii) when I
have to carry a load (like enough laminate flooring to do the kitchen
floor). None of these occurences constitue part of a 'daily routine'.

Can I have my #two now, please?

--
John

SV650
Black it is
and naked

 

ffs

 

I'm begining to think there's scope for a raft of YTC numbers to be
handed out, were it not for the absense of that particular KOTL.

 

I'm sorry, but I read the criteria on the ukrm pages, and it mentions
nothing about there being, or not being a car in the family. I belive I
pasted the pertinent bit, so I won't repeat it. What's the point in
publishing a definition/requiremnt if it's incorrect?

I'm calling trade descriptions....

--
John

SV650
Black it is
and naked

 

Well, I thought that was always the case. If I'm wrong, perhaps an
ex-KotL can let me know.

 

No, the car my sister drives is registered to her, now.

 

Please do.

^^^^^^^^

A typo like that deserves something, certainly...

A compelling argument; I will consider it. Judgement will be given by
the end of the week.

I said the end of the week, if at all. Be patient.

 

Darren Robinson said:

I'd like to join jsp in a class action.