The Real Road Toll

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by Uncle Bully, May 8, 2006.

  1. Uncle Bully

    Theo Bekkers Guest

    The total road toll for Oz is only 1500. All but 70 on all other
    roads? Hmmm...

    Theo
     
    Theo Bekkers, May 9, 2006
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. ..
    They did the same for drink-driving too when they wanted to prove their
    point. It's called spin-doctoring or presenting wanted figures, the
    government (on either side) have been doing it for years, the media loves it
    as it makes for sensational stories but I think the best at it are the
    feminists. ( now aint that going to stir the pot ;) )
     
    UMGUANAKICKBOODIE, May 9, 2006
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. something like 25% in Vietnam (scary aint it). Strafe first ask questions
    later!!
     
    UMGUANAKICKBOODIE, May 9, 2006
    #23
  4. Uncle Bully

    Albm&ctd Guest

    Isn't that where drive about in a suicidal state with 4 of your mates as
    passengers?

    Al
     
    Albm&ctd, May 9, 2006
    #24
  5. Uncle Bully

    reg-john Guest

    youre an idiot mate. how do you think you get your food, clothes, petrol,
    EVERYTHING from any shop? trucks, ya fuckin dipshit. from what youve said in
    this post, its probably YOU who shouldnt be on the road. know-it-all,
    generalising wanker who would never put a foot wrong, huh?

    here are possible arguments to what ive said:

    -freight should be on rail - you build the infrastructure mate, good luck
    though.
    -trucks should be smaller - it will be you the consumer paying more becuase
    they have to carry less freight in a single truck.
     
    reg-john, May 9, 2006
    #25
  6. Uncle Bully

    Saus29 Guest

    you get a little upset about things, don't you?
    that is exactly what I was talking about, the infrastructure was there(for
    the population at the time) then they sacked all the workers and stopped
    using it.
    you would need smaller trucks for the localised transport off the trains,
    those trucks would not be on the highway.

    if all roads were dual carriageway then the trucks could still work, but as
    it stands they don't help things now.
    AND don't forget all railway crossings would need to be upgraded to fit the
    plan.
    but I doesn't matter because nothing will ever change, a human life is
    unimportant to the business of making money.
     
    Saus29, May 9, 2006
    #26
  7. Uncle Bully

    Saus29 Guest

    I hope you die in a fiery crash
     
    Saus29, May 9, 2006
    #27
  8. Uncle Bully

    Uncle Bully Guest

    The average annual road toll for the decade 1994-2003 was just over
    1800/year
     
    Uncle Bully, May 9, 2006
    #28
  9. Uncle Bully

    Uncle Bully Guest

    I'm just waiting for the Iraq toll to get higher than 9/11, we're only about
    300 shy at the moment. Then we'll see some fun and games in Washington.
     
    Uncle Bully, May 9, 2006
    #29
  10. IME the typical short-haul truckie tends to be a very good driver.
    Around the big cities, truck drivers are generally courteous, and do an
    amazing job at avoiding getting things with 4 wheels tangled up in them
    - especially considering the stupid things that drivers of 4-wheeled
    vehicles do.
    Get out on the highways and in the country towns however, and it seems
    the further you are from a capital city, the more likely you are to find
    a complete and utter moron in a truck. Not saying they are all like
    that, but I have encountered a lot of very dangerous activities
    performed by truck drivers. Things like...
    * red-light running in towns
    * changing lanes while a vehicle is overtaking pushing the overtaking
    vehicle into oncoming traffic
    * driving down the centre line and not moving back to their side for
    oncoming cars
    *tailgating
    *dangerous speeding (despite their trailer swaying into the oncoming
    traffic)
    *tailing on high-beam (which means high beam plus their spotties)
    *overtaking when unsafe and pulling back over before the trailer is
    fully past
    *pulling onto the highway from a sideroad in front of traffic - the list
    goes on.
    Now I know there are lots of morons in cars, but in the country I find
    that it's the trucks that are more likely to do stupid things. Any day
    of the week, any time of the day, I can guarantee that if I were to
    drive 50km on any of the 6 highways that leave the town I live in, turn
    around and come back, that in that 100km I would encounter at least 1
    truck doing one of the above activities or something equally dangerous.
    I could also guarantee that if I was to take a 1 hour drive in the city
    that I'd encounter a car driver doing something stupid too. But cars in
    the city are a lot more common than trucks on the highway (so
    statistically the moron/car ratio is much lower than the moron/truck),
    and a braindead driver behind the wheel of a 1.5tonne car doing 60km/hr
    is much less of an issue than a braindead driver behind the wheel of a
    50tonne truck doing 110km/hr.
    I used to live very close to a busy rail line that carried coal trains.
    In fact my yard bordered onto the rail verge, and we were 1 house away
    from a level crossing. The trains came through roughly hourly, 24
    hours/day, 6 days/week. Another place I lived was about a block from a
    major highway through town. The hourly trains blowing their klaxon at
    the level crossing were nowhere near as disturbing as the idiot truck
    drivers using their exhaust brakes in the middle of a residential area.
    The trucks would wake me far more frequently than the trains did. I
    currently live about 1km from the highway, and in the time it has so far
    taken me to type this sentence I've heard 2 trucks hit their exhaust
    brakes. Even at this distance, with the windows closed because of the
    cold, they are loud enough that you'll occasionally miss a word of two
    on the TV. They are loud enough that they occasionally wake the kid, and
    occasionally wake me. I'd rather trains any day to truck drivers who
    are too friggin stupid (or discourteous, one of the two) to understand
    the meaning of a sign that reads "RESIDENTIAL AREA. PLEASE REFRAIN FROM
    USING EXHAUST BRAKES THROUGH TOWN".
    Yes, give me one train instead of 100 trucks any day of the week. Let
    the trains do the long-haul stuff, and leave the trucks for the local
    deliveries. Such an outcome would be safer, less damaging to our roads,
    and give cheaper freight. And before people start fussing about double
    handling (pickup on truck, load to rail, unload to truck for delivery),
    the majority of long haul road freight is transported on different
    vehicles for the long-haul portion and the local portion anyway. The
    only thing that changes is the type of vehicle doing the long-haul. Rail
    would slow things down a little, although if a little was spent on
    infrastructure (bearing in mind that the last 40 years have seen rail
    infrastructure in this country run down dramatically) it can be at least
    as fast, if not faster, than road traffic.
    True - but in the case of long-haul, the people that f it up are more
    often than not the truck drivers anyway.
     
    Graham Fountain, May 9, 2006
    #30
  11. Pass the cling wrap, boy.
     
    Pisshead Pete, May 9, 2006
    #31
  12. Uncle Bully

    reg-john Guest

    well done!


     
    reg-john, May 10, 2006
    #32
  13. Uncle Bully

    reg-john Guest

    you are completely wrong. out on the highway, it is car drivers every single
    night (and im out every single night) who drive on highbeam, overtake then
    slowdown again, weave in and out etc.

    im a car driver myself lots of people somehow think truck drivers have never
    or do not drive a car. the simple fact is there are idiots everywhere, but
    dont you even try to say truck drivers out of the cities are arseholes, they
    are by far and away better behaved in general than any other drivers on the
    road, and have the at fault crash % to back it up. thats without even
    calling in km's travelled per period.

    your post is a shining example of using EVERYTHING possible to make your
    point, which is based on generalisations, hyperbole and emotion. its a
    beautiful stunt, but most will see through it.

    the whole rail argument is great, but if you can figure out a way to build
    rail infrastructure to allow freigh to get from say syd to melb in 10 hours
    including the time it takes for the train to be loaded and unloaded and
    ready for pickup with ZERO delay, then no express company will go near it,
    no refrigerated company will go near it.

    there has been a lot more non urgent freight being placed onto rail, but it
    ha s along way to go and this govt would not be interested in designing a
    genuine solution.

    right about now i could reel off 150 different stories about idiot car
    drivers, but i wont becuase its pointless and the tool of someone who doesnt
    really know what theyre talking about.
     
    reg-john, May 10, 2006
    #33
  14. Uncle Bully

    Albm&ctd Guest

    A Saus29 sizzle?

    Al
     
    Albm&ctd, May 10, 2006
    #34
  15. Uncle Bully

    D Walford Guest

    Thank you for the complement but its not true to say that short haul
    drivers are better than long distance truck drivers.

    Would you prefer that instead of stopping they hit something?
    They don't use the exhaust brake to annoy people, they use the things
    because they need to.
    The fucking idiot who designed those signs has obviously never driven a
    heavily loaded truck.
    Pure fantasy.
    Companies can choose any mode of transport they want, if rail was as you
    describe "it can be at least as fast, if not faster, than road traffic"
    then why don't they choose rail?
    The company I deliver for receives interstate deliveries every day (Syd
    -Melb) and the goods stay on the same trailers all the way, the
    interstate drivers deliver the trailers to the depot then local drivers
    and trucks deliver the goods into our warehouse, double handling is
    very costly and the risk of damage to goods increases significantly.



    Daryl
     
    D Walford, May 10, 2006
    #35
  16. Uncle Bully

    D Walford Guest

    IMO a certain amount of blame for car drivers not understanding how to
    behave around heavy vehicles can be put on those responsible for driver
    training, many drivers don't seem to understand how much space a large
    truck needs and some form of driver education would be very useful.
    The transport industry could also help itself a lot if they put some
    money towards car driver education.
    BP has recently put some very large signs on the back of their tankers
    warning drivers to not cut in front of trucks.



    Daryl
     
    D Walford, May 10, 2006
    #36
  17. Oh the irony. Just yesterday afternoon I was driving up James St,
    Toowoomba, in the right lane (because I planned on turning right at
    Mackenzie St ahead) doing about 60 (which is the speed limit), and a BP
    tanker caught up with me and was tailgating very close. I wanted to turn
    right ahead, so put my indicator on a little sooner than I normally
    would to give the truck a bit of notice that I was going to be
    slowing/stopping. About the same time, the light ahead went amber.
    There was still enough distance I could have coasted to a stop if I
    needed to, because it is uphill. Even if the light was green I would
    have needed to stop anyway because of oncoming traffic. I backed a
    little off the accelerator so I started slowing a little, and _touched_
    the brakes (ie make the brake lights come on, without any braking
    effect) to make it clear that I intended to stop. He showed absolutely
    no sign of backing off and got even closer. There is no turn-right lane
    at these lights, and it was clear this idiot wasn't going to stop behind
    me, and by now I was running out of road. So I abandoned my right turn,
    and changed into the left lane (in front of another car) and stopped at
    the lights. I then watched the truck proceed through the now red light,
    with the smoke coming out of his exhaust indicating he was powering
    hard. Remember, this was uphill, with plenty of distance to the lights
    at the time they turned amber. I can only assume the driver didn't want
    to have to stop at the lights and hence get moving again. The red-light
    camera at that intersection did flash, so hopefully he'll get a nice
    fine in the mail for his impatience.
    I agree cutting in front of trucks is bad, but when they tailgate that
    is a different matter entirely. He caught up with me, I didn't cut in
    front of him. He was following me at a distance that would have left him
    no option but to go into me if I had to make a sudden stop. This is a
    residential area, so the usual risks of unexpected things (cars, kids
    etc) applies. I didn't notice one of these "don't cut in" signs on this
    truck, but to be fair I wasn't really taking notice of what he had on
    the back of his trailer.
    BTW, certainly not the first time I have been tailgated on this street,
    and definitely not the first time I have seen trucks run red lights
    along here.
     
    Graham Fountain, May 10, 2006
    #37
  18. Uncle Bully

    D Walford Guest

    Did you get his rego number and call BP?
    If not why?
    I have to wonder why you seem to have so much trouble with trucks, when
    I drive my ute or my wifes car I never have those sort of problems, I
    wonder what you do to attract their attention?



    Daryl
     
    D Walford, May 11, 2006
    #38
  19. Implying?

    ---
    Cheers

    PeterC [aka MildThing]
    Before an accident, most city drivers say "****!", whereas most country drivers
    say "Hang on to this stubby, mate, while I show you some awesome driving"
    '81 Yamaha Virago (XV) 750H (work in progress)
    '01 Yamaha FJR1300

    www.dmcsc.org.au
    http://eladesom.com.au/ulysses/
    # 37181
     
    Peter Cremasco, May 11, 2006
    #39
  20. An all too common occurrence. Personally, I don't believe that a fully
    loaded truck/semi has any business doing 60 kph on these streets. They
    simply cannot pull up in time.

    Having said that, however, any truck doing much less than that - and
    trying to keep a buffer zone in front of them - pretty soon finds that
    their buffer zone is filled by other traffic that sees a space and takes
    it. To a certain extent, they then rely on their bigger bulk
    intimidating other road users.

    Coming back from Stanthorpe way, last week, I ended up putting the
    Landcruiser off the road shoulder to avoid an oncoming truckie who
    decided that he just HAD to overtake the car in front of him. There was
    no way in hell he was going to be able to do that with the space between
    he and I, but that didn't stop him. That was a Wickham's Transport
    truck.

    Later on, the same stretch of road between Stanthorpe and Warwick, the
    B-Double fuel tanker that I was following must've had the same urge -
    except this time HE was faced with an oncoming truck. He didn't even
    think about pulling back - just kept powering on. The Muzzo in front of
    him (traveling in the same direction as the fuel truck and I, very
    quickly opted for the table drain off the road. The B-Double swung back
    into his lane just in time.

    That lack of patience isn't confined to truckies, however. The same day,
    arriving in Toowoomba, I had a car pull out of a side street in front of
    me, causing me to brake hard, and she then propped and did a right turn
    in front of oncoming traffic - causing THEM to brake VERY hard.

    In all three cases, there was a very strong reliance on trusting that
    some other person would back down.

    'Taint a truckie problem - 'tis a people problem. And people will take
    advantage of whatever advantage their mode of transport gives them.
    Cyclists will hop between footpath and road; truckies will use their
    size as bullying behaviour; motorcyclists will used small size and quick
    acceleration to lane-split or squirt overtake between opposing lanes;
    car drivers will use the relative anonymity of their enclosed cage (plus
    degree of protection from impact) to occupy that space that is currently
    occupied by a 'lesser' more vulnerable road user.


    ---
    Cheers

    PeterC [aka MildThing]
    Before an accident, most city drivers say "****!", whereas most country drivers
    say "Hang on to this stubby, mate, while I show you some awesome driving"
    '81 Yamaha Virago (XV) 750H (work in progress)
    '01 Yamaha FJR1300

    www.dmcsc.org.au
    http://eladesom.com.au/ulysses/
    # 37181
     
    Peter Cremasco, May 11, 2006
    #40
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.