The law about motorcycle combinations and helmets.

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:29:38 +0100, JP wrote:

So: "how to decieve the public without actually lying"? That would be
contemptible in a public servant.

 

http://www.onzin.nl/3991/video/meetjoeblack.mpg

--

Dave

GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
SbS#6? DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#16? FUB#3
FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19

 

Yeah, that's the one. My son e-mailed it to me. Look's 'faked'
(like so much on the 'internet') but as I told my son it reminded
me of the accident I saw outside his school some years ago which
was in some respects very similar.

I wonder if anyone could say for certain, which of the many similar
video's available over the internet are 'real' or 'faked', how
'convincing' is this video?

 

I can say with absolute certainty that the video clip in question is not
real. It is a clip from the film "Meet Joe Black" (there's a clue in the
title of the MPEG).

HTH

Regards

S.P.

 

Oh well...here goes.......

Can you, or anyone else, say with certainty, that any of the video
images you have seen are 'real' and an accurate depiction of actual
events?

 

(The Older Gentleman) wrote in

I know bloody well what a Quasar is. Calling me a c*nt is an open
admission that you have lost the argument,

 

Alun Palmer wrote

Sad to say mate that really is not the case, that genuinely was a Class
1 perfect example of TOG calling you a ****.

 

And it took you 10 days to come back with that?

 

(The Older Gentleman) wrote in

Another admission of failure to carry your argument, i.e. another
groundless insult

 

I have better things to do than to watch this group all the time

 

Alun Palmer wrote

Granted it could be described as a groundless insult but it is hardly an
admission of failure is it now?

I mean, there are those who would say that the old geezer has set off an
itch up your arse that ain't just the crabs. That alone would be enough
to get him an endorsement on his trolling old git certificate.

'Course it is all a matter of perspective really innit?

 

*Proud*

 

The Older Gentleman wrote

Keep up the good work

 

Well, if he's just trolling then that could be regarded as a success, but
that's like succeeding at being an idiot. Not very challenging, is it?

 

Alun Palmer wrote of TOG

Just goes to show how little you really know dunnit eh?

You ask anybody, I am a kin roaring success at being an idiot I am and
it costs me *all* my effort to achieve this. It is the hardest work I
have ever done I can tell you that.

Not very challenging?

Plonker.

 

Well, of course if you really are an idiot then almost anything could be
challenging.

 

Alun Palmer wrote

I am yer genuine idiot savant I am. I just haven't found out what it is
I am good at yet though.

 

Yes, but if a vehicle is over 610kgs it cannot be taxed as a
motorcycle at all. According to DVLA it is no longer a motorcycle at
all! As such, with PLG tax, no helmet need be worn. Also, folk tend to
forget, this particular sidecar combination complies with all of the
DVLA specs for a 'hearse.' It is therefore a hearse in legal terms,
albeit a three wheeled hearse, rather than a bike. Top hats may
therefore be worn rather than helmets.

 

is no lid still a standard £10 fine and an unendorseable offence?


--
Backbone server http://www.surfbaud.co.uk/
E-mail (rot-13) qnirahyy NG oyhrlbaqre QBG pb QBG hx
Cable server http://80.235.132.38:800/
What crap am I selling on e-bay?
http://members.ebay.co.uk/aboutme/error505sex/
EoF

 

Try 410kg - I dont know where you got 610kg from. As for being a
hearse? You need to do a lot more digging than that I`m afraid!
Might be worth avoiding top-posting as well!