Since my last bike was a Bandit 600, and the local shop had a 650 demonstrator, well, it seemed rude not to. What I wanted to find out was how much of the extra 50cc had been devoted to making it more useable low down: my main gripe about the old 600. The answer is: some, enough to be noticeable, but not enough to convince me. riding in town I found that you could actually pull away with traffic easily form as low as 2,000rpm. If memory serves me aright, anything less than 3,500 was a no no on the old one. Obviously, compared to the SV everything was so smoooooth. Out and about I was suprised how well the thing handled. I did expect it to feel like a lumbering hulk compared to the SV, but it really didn't feel at all bad. The other test was with the wife on the back. On the old 600, it always felt a bit risky going for quick pull offs at traffic light etc. This was noticeably better, but I still had to be more concious of the revs than I do on the SV. What else? oh yes. Onlike the SV, you cannot pull out from behind a car and expect to overtake it from 4,000rpm. You just don't go anywhere... Pop it down a couple of gears and it does pull quite nicely thank you. Out on the open road, you get quite shift on, and it was pretty rapid [1]. I had the naked version, and the little cowling it has on the lights does a suprisingly good job. You get very little wind until you hit about 90, when all of a sudden the dynamics change a bit and you get quite a blast. All in all, a nice bike and I wouldn't be disappointed to own one. But... when I got back on the SV to go home, and fired the twin up, I have to admit a grin appeared that wasn't quite there on the BAndit. Perhaps it's familiarity. Oh, did I mention it picks up its front whell suprising easily when you try and make a rapid departure from the lights? [1] yes, I know, not compared to your litre sports bikes.. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Krusty did scribe: You snipped the bit about having my wife ot the back. (I also had with some luggage in mind, tbh) Making sure you got away smartly having filtered to the front took more effort than I would have liked: making sure your revs were up enough etc. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Hooligan wrote Two mistakes there then, the least of which is that you are fucking riding it wrong then aren't you. See that nice Mr Suzuki especially modified the engine management and stuff when they made the bindit to move what little grunt it may or may not have down the revs so that muppets who were afraid of a full throttle could pretend they were having more fun than they really were so thrashing the nuts off it to the red line isn't worth the effort, unless you are in third, in which case it is the most fun you can have on one.
I think that Suzuki should have made a UK 750 version, makes sense, rather than paying a higher rate of road tax and getting next to feck all for it in the way of extra oomph.
Muck did scribe: That would be a bike I'd like to have a go on. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Krusty did scribe: I did consider the possibility that you were coming form another angle. I jumped the wrong way ;-/ -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Muck did scribe: One up, fine, you can pull away fast enough to lift the front wheel as you go. Two up with a pack on? Not so confidence inspiring. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
It's as easy as swapping the cylinder block and pistons off the right model of gsxr750. You can get a standard 600 bored out to 884cc if you want to, I think that there are also 800cc kits available.
Muck did scribe: Not so easy if you don't have one to modify, and a lot of effort to go to for a try. I did like the Bandit I had, I just wanted a bit more low down grunt, without going all the way to a 1200 (which remains a possibility). -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Muck did scribe: btdt with wife and fully laden: enough to know I'd prefer to have a bit more low down than the 600 offered. Notice I haven't said it can't be done, just that it takes more effort than I'd like to have to put into it. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
Higher rpm and slipping the clutch are your friend, not the bikes though. You ought to try riding my FZR250RR if you want to practice not bogging on take offs.
Muck did scribe: You appear to be intent on interpreting my statements as implying that I can't get away from the lights quickly. This is not what I am saying: I am perfectly capable of getting away from the lights at speed. What I am saying is that the Bandit does not have as much low down torque as I would like, in order to pull quickly and smoothly away from the lights with wife and luggage on board. The two things are different. I *can* do it, but I can, for example, do it a hell of a lot more easily on the SV, which does have more low down torque. Getting back on the SV this morning, having just got off the Bandit, demonstrated this to me admirably. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked
And when an oppertunity like this comes it seams rude not to pick your brains. My mate is doing his DAS and wants one of two bikes, either the bandit or the SV both naked. I am inclined to point him to the bandit as I had one and now have a B12, but did like cristofires SV when I had a go. Whats your (and general peep's) views. By the way my mate is 6foot6 and weighs about 15 stone. TIA Ken B12
fish did scribe: It's a harder call than you might think. The two bikes are quite different. The Bandit is much smoother. The SV has more grunt low down. The Bandit handled better than I thought it might, but I think the SV is the more flicky. The SV is, I think, 168kg to the Bandit's 208kg. The Bandit does have more top end power than the SV (I think) If he's going 2nd hand, I believe the K3 SV has more power that the original model. If you drop an SV it doesn't wear bits of the engine away. The riding position on both is quite similar. Tell him to get the one he likes the look of. -- John (jsp) SV 650 Black it is And Naked