HEADS UP - ALERT FOR ACTION Cashless tolling on the Cross City Tunnel may result in a protest ride when it opens. A "Show of Strength" to induce good Television coverage of tolling issues. To be discussed at next MCC meeting, June 6 Meeting with Minister for Roads this week. Await outcomes before going crazy, but the outcomes may make us go crazy. Please digest the following points and communicate them to your members.Stay Tuned - more in one week. Failure in transport planning has brought us to this. ----------------------------------------------------- Motorcycles were not considered in traffic plans and have been forgotten in government negotiations for privately run toll roads. This is why motorcycles have been tolled as cars since the 1986 agreement for the Harbour Tunnel pushed up ALL tolls. We just got lost in the shouting about higher tolls. Now we can correct some of the failures to make provisions for motorcycles. Some organisations will resist change, but the facts are very clear, motorcyclists have been marginalised for years. NSW Government holds the contracts for toll roads - it is a policy issue and hence a voters issue. Toll rates for motorcycles are too high. ---------------------------------------- A family sedan is no more a heavy truck than a motorcycle is a family sedan. Differential toll rates exist between cars and trucks, but not between cars and motorcycles in NSW. One-Quarter of the car rate is the fair and reasonable toll rate for motorcycles. This rational figure is based upon road wear, space occupancy, congestion and clean air considerations. Prescribed toll schedules [the ones the govt agreed with the toll operators - ZJ] fail to list motorcycles. Motorcycles are an afterthought. Motorcyclists are happy to pay a toll. -------------------------------------- As long as the toll rate is reasonable AND that we are not charged extra administrative fees. E-tags don't work for most motorcycles ---------------------------------------- The supplied E-tags are not fit for the purpose sold. Check out the 'Terms and Conditions' for the use of E-tags, no mention of how to use them on motorcycles [but plenty of mention about how you are liable if you don't fit them exactly as instructed - ZJ] Advertising of E-tags to riders is misleading and fails to disclose problems E-tag is not weatherproof, is affected by vibration and heat e.. If it fails due to weather damage, it costs you Dangerous to carry upon ones person due to shattering to shards on impact, Cannot be mounted to most motorcycles and hence can't be aimed correctly at the antenna Fails to read due to inability to aim it correctly, hence further administration costs charged to you Riders try to use them, but are forced into unsafe practices, such as:- riding one-handed through the toll plaza, waving the tag until it changes the taffic light colour placing it in a jacket pocket (the casing shatters into shards on impact and can easily penetrate the body)- Using an armband pouch - this places the rider at risk due to windage rotating the pouch and having it interfere with arm movement and hence control of the motorcycle - worst on sportsbikes. Too tight causes numbness. It also defeats the purpose of protective gear, providing a point impact on the upper arm. These are dangerous The MCC of NSW has worked with the RTA and E-tag suppliers and industrial designers to assist solving the problem [and the RTA admits that they haven't managed to make a bike-safe etag - ZJ] No suitable E-tag exists anywhere in the world. Alternative proposals for cashless tolling demand additional fees for not ------------------------------------------------------------------------- using an E-tag ---------------- Toll road operators are demanding riders pay for failure to use an unsuitable E-tag The toll road operator expects riders to pay $1.60 per trip for administration, in addition to the toll This is gouging It is misuse of market power. The E-tag is not fit for purpose. Photographic methods are enforcement tools being used inappropriately. Use of photographic enforcement tools means we don't pay a toll, but buy an indemnity against prosecution. This is back to front as NO MEANS OF PAYING is provided Any protest will be a display of strength of numbers, NOT to inconvenience other drivers, particularly emergency or commercial traffic. What can a protest achieve? Publicity and public outcry to publicise the issues. About what? The toll rate needs fixing to a fair and reasonable level. Despite all other problems with accounts and tolls, this issue is PRIME. It stems from failure of public policy to include motorcycles in transport planning The failure to provide a suitable tolling method follows on from this. Secondary are the issues about goods not fit for purpose, no suitable electronic tolling method for motorcycles, additional fees for inability to comply - so why the hell should we have to pay for this failure? There is a good base of commercial law for those issues, but toll rate remains first issue.
It'll never work, Zebee. Gotta play 'em at their own game! It's interesting to note how people seem to get so worked up over tunnels though. Can we throw in all the other injustices motorcycles are currently copping as well as the soon to be proposed ones too?
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 25 May 2005 05:00:58 GMT On its own, never. Ask the Vics... But if you do the spadework beforehand, and use this as one tool amongst many.., Mind you, as I expect that a turnout that *doesn't* block something will not be listened to, and as the only way to make a decent block is to do it during working hours, and as bikers won't do anything that remotely inconveniences them... My personal belief is that it's not going to help. We shall see what the MCC meeting decides. I think mass protests are useless without a mass (and useless with one!), and I can't see Sydney bikers putting themselves out even if it is about money! Want to list them? After all, people may be trying to do things about them. And could certainly use some help, so state which ones are the ones you are really interested in and then people working on them can contact you, right? Zebee
Does it have to be during business hours? Why not on a Sunday afternoon? That way you probably have the greatest number of bikes available to attend and a pretty large public audience for the 6pm TV news, especially during winter months. Nev.. '03 ZX12R
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 25 May 2005 16:22:08 +1000 I don't personally, although with a lot of spadework they can be part of a strategy. But I'm a delegate to the MCC doing my job. Zebee
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 25 May 2005 16:48:36 +1000 Depends. I believe that the MCC hope that a protest showing number of people affected will do the job. Which means you are betting on getting a lot of bikes there. So doing it on a weekend on a dry day maximises your chances of that. And the powers that be know it. Whereas getting a lot of people to actually put themselves out and spend money and effort makes a much bigger hit. Because it is much harder to do. I believe that 1000 bikers on a Monday 9am would make a much bigger impact where it matters than 5000 on a Sunday. Hell even 500 would. Zebee
The way Sydney toll roads are structured, I'm not sure that there's a location that 100-500-1000-whatever bikes would cause a newsworthy disruption on a Sunday afternoon. The bits that get clogged up on Sunday afternoons are the entry points to greater Sydney, and a couple of internal bottlenecks. The Sydney-Newcastle freeway gets busy southbound late afternoon, as does the Spit Bridge route off the peninsula. Neither of those are near any points of protest though. We could sit on the Harbour Bridge or Tunnel or in the new tunnel or something, but on Sunday, the world would just re-route around us. As Zebee says, 500 bikes on Monday morning would have a better effect, but we're apathetic bastards here in Sydney. If it takes a visit from the Melbourne mob for us to organise an ausmoto dinner, what makes you think we'll get off our arses to hold up some traffic?! GB
Isn't this a good thing? For those of us that have Etags, the cash lanes are a pain in the arse. I think the cashless tolls are a good idea. Actually they suck, but out of cashless tolls and cash tolls, cashless wins.
I would think the media and powers that be only care about the absolute numbers, not the degree of difficulty with which they were attained. One is objective, the other subjective... you're not in a position to be subjective. Nev.. '03 ZX12R
Yes, but only when they come up with an etag that works on motorcycles properly(that is safe for the rider and will work in all weathers) or some other model for payment that doesn't discriminate against motorcycle riders by adding extra processing fees for using photos instead of electronic IDs. It should be as easy for motorcyclists as it currently is for car users, and currently it is not. Not making bikes pay the same toll as cars would be an improvement. Al (Not a big toll user anyway)
I would think that if one bloke managed to do himself in sufficiently badly that it held up a significant number of peak hour punters, you'd get telly cameras showing up. Its all relative. GB, leave my relatives out of this.
Dunno what Vic's up to but I agree with the latter. Fair enough. I dunno. I think a well thought out, planned and publicised protest would work. I'd like to see the issues addressed that not only affect us but other motorists as well, such as casual users and having to pay extra when their technology fails, which would help to lessen any public and media backlash. I'd also like to see the other issues (below) that we face as motorcyclists riding on the back of it. Phrases such as revenue raising, discrimination and environmentally friendly seem to be in favour at the moment and should used accordingly. As for attendance. If the Celebration of Australian Motorcycling was anything to go by then I'd opt for a weekend ride through _all_ of the local toll points followed by a meet with speeches, bands, food, drinks, socialising and the like. Have a contingency plan in case they scare the Lions Club off again! If the powers that be call for a hard hitting, kneejerk, piss off people, approach then I'd go for opening day, one lane full of parked bikes at each entry, during opening and both peak times. Either way, I'll be there. Umm... Unfair CTP prices Parking Front plates Sticker tax (my cars don't have to have them) and associated unRandom roadBlock Testing Extra licensing costs (compulsary user pays training for cars too) RTA and other Gumbyment departments refusing to communicate (presuming they still aren't but are consulting other motorist groups) 0.02 BAC for motorcyclists No probs! The reply-to email eventually gets me, or my from: name bit sent at bigponds company domain will get me sooner. Big has my phone number.
Maybe in NSW, but not in Victoria! That's why 40/250 motorcyclists, depending on which thread you believe, of the 200,000+ licenced riders in the state protested last week. At least CityLink's toll schedule recognises a motorcycle as half a car, though. - sanbar
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 25 May 2005 13:40:20 GMT Being worked on. THe MCC has been talkign to the MAA for a while, exploring different options and hammering about the unfairness. I think there are facts and figures on the MCC site about the injury and claim rates. Persuading the govt to give up revenue is ski resort in hell time, but stopping them increasing premiums is possible, as is getting them to offer different kinds of rego such as solo seat and dirtbike. Being worked on. I believe bikes using loading zones is just about a done deal, and the agreement with councils about parking parallel to the kerb near intersections, required bike parking in multistories and shopping centres, and general bike parking standards is in the works and maybe half way through. Being worked on. The AMC is developing a strategy to deal with the National Transport mob who are the state transport ministers dealing with this. The big driver is the bod from Vic who is apparently an argumentative bastard whose mode of operation is to get all aggro about wanting front plates and the other transport ministers don't care so give it to him to shut him up. They are being lobbied by the various state lobby groups. I suspect that what will kill this isn't work by rider groups, but the sheer impracticality. Being worked on. The EPA have been told to pull their head in by parliament and get it right, the courts have thrown out some prosecutions. I think they are keeping quiet while they work out what to do. the MCC is still collecting stats, so anyone who gets booked for not having a sticker or for excessive noise should contact the MCC. Being worked on. This one's harder because the cops are difficult to deal with. It will probably have to be done via questions in Parliament which is a bloody glacial process. The Hornsby cops are anti-bike - witness their behaviour at the recent Mt White show - and so are eager to pull these roadblocks so as to wave their dicks at riders. MCC letters asking why the discrimination and why they aren't working with riders for road safety the way other commands are have been met with silence. Don't know what's being done about this. Being worked on. This is an on again off again thing. Was almost there, then they changed ministers and the RTA backed off. I believe the memorandum of understanding is about to be accepted, but if not then it's back to Parliament which is the only stick you can beat them with. Being worked on. Plenty of submissions and complaints on this one, and it doesn't seem to have surfaced again. IT's part of the RTA thing above really, trying to get them to agree to consult formally which makes it a lot harder for them just to do things like this. THe paper trail required by community consultation processes means they have to work a bit harder to shaft said community. Won't stop them, but may make them think a bit more before they do it and do it less often. OK. WHich one really gets you the most? If you have a pet peeve them I can give your details to the bods doing that, else can I say "here's someone who wants to help, which section needs someone?" The only one I know needs a co-ordinator at the moment is compulsory headlights on for all vehicles which the feds are pushing, and that's not on your list I think that the RTA consultative committee and posible the 3rd party people need bods to go to meetings with RTA and MAA and put the biker's point, but I'm not sure. If meetings aren't your thing, then can you do stuff like write briefing papers, sort through stats, write press releases, give talks to councils and schools, wade through research and write summaries? Can you run a group of people, giving them jobs and making sure they are done? Those are the sorts of things i can think of that are needed, there are probably others I don't know of. If you can think of things you can do that would be useful, then go for it and offer them. Zebee
In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 26 May 2005 00:15:29 +1000 Buried down in the report in The Age was a note that using photos would mean a $1.60 processing cost. If that applies to bikes, doesn't that mean they aren't paying half toll? Zebee
I don't know why people insist on using the number of licenced riders when they're giving statistics or making a point. The only valid statistic is the number of road registered motorcycles. Nev.. '03 ZX12R
I got sent this last week: http://www.mightymedia.com.au/~bigiain/SCT.jpg It sort of shows the right spots to "accidentally fall down". Now all we need is some volunteer "faller downers". Whats Shadow up to these days? Anyone seen Zeke lately? Maybe Aido doesn't even need to fall down, he could just have a string of held up Taragos behind him blocking traffic... ;-) big
It is easy. I never carry my tag, I get flashed everytime, but I'm still only charged the normal rate. Hell yeah. Or even better no toll (since we are efficient enviro friendly road users of course
In aus.motorcycles on Thu, 26 May 2005 19:09:14 +1000 Now you are. It is likely that inthe e-tag only tunnels this will not be true, and also likely that it may no longer be true elsewhere. Zebee