Steering Head Bearings (again)

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Christofire, Jun 16, 2004.

  1. Christofire

    Tim Guest

    The only reliable one I ever had was a K1, the other two (R80RT and
    K75RT) both let me down.
    --
    Tim two#21, YGL#3 & BOTAFOT#84

    Due to the limitations of current email, the lip movements may be
    out of synchronisation as you move your finger under the text while reading.

    tim dot ukrm2 at dsl dot pipex dot com
     
    Tim, Jun 18, 2004
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Christofire

    Christofire Guest

    Now, shall I choose a tale about fixing the Wing, the KH or the TS?
     
    Christofire, Jun 18, 2004
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Christofire

    Christofire Guest

    I've adjusted them once before. The bike was fine when I picked it up,
    but over about 1k miles the bearings started knocking. Tighten them up
    and over the next 1k the knock's back again.

    The bike had its 12k mile service early (more in keeping with the
    timescale as opposed to mileage done), which hints that the previous
    owner wouldn't have skimped on maintenance (it's an expensive service).
     
    Christofire, Jun 18, 2004
    #23
  4. Christofire

    Salad Dodger Guest

    Any you like.

    The Wing's troubles are caused by the inaccessibility of everything.

    Very little has actually gone wrong with it.

    If you want to suggest that the quality of engineering on your Triumph
    is comparable to that of a mid-seventies Japanese two-stroke, you'll
    get no argument from me.

    Except that they're still on their original steering head bearings,
    afaict.

    --
    | ___ Salad Dodger
    |/ \
    _/_____\_ GL1500SEV/CBR1100XXX/KH500A8/TS250C/CBX1000Z
    |_\_____/_| ..66073../..15556.../..Ebay./.Ebay./pending.
    (>|_|_|<) TPPFATUICG#7 DIAABTCOD#9 YTC#4 PM#5
    |__|_|__| BOTAFOT #70 BOTAFOF #09 two#11 WG*
    \ |^| / IbW#0 & KotIbW# BotTOS#6 GP#4
    \|^|/ ANORAK#17
    '^' RBR-Visited:35 Pts: 705 Miles:2429
     
    Salad Dodger, Jun 18, 2004
    #24
  5. Christofire

    darsy Guest

    Triumph have been going for a while - you'd think they could afford a
    better designer than some spotty YTS oik.
     
    darsy, Jun 18, 2004
    #25
  6. Christofire

    deadmail Guest

    Well, I've done about 40k miles on K100s and in that time I've broken
    down once due to a broken wire feeding the fuel pump. Not bad on bikes
    pushing 20 years old. Current one's done about 83k miles and the other
    one... I don't know, figure it was clocked when I got it.
     
    deadmail, Jun 19, 2004
    #26
  7. Christofire

    deadmail Guest

    In their current iteration they've not been going that long really; 10
    or 15 years I think. Could be wrong though...
     
    deadmail, Jun 19, 2004
    #27
  8. Christofire

    sweller Guest

    sweller, Jun 19, 2004
    #28
  9. Christofire

    deadmail Guest

    Me too, at one point their capacity was 5 bikes a day and I was
    thinking... that's, say, 50 weeks a year, 5 days a week, 5 bikes a
    day... 1,250 bikes a year. At say, 6k a pop that's 7.5 million turn
    over and assuming, say 33% GM (which I'd guess is ridiculously high)
    that 2.5 million. Hmm, 2.5/60 is about 4%- not a good ROI.

    Of course, I don't have a clue about the costs of things but I'd guess
    I've been optimistic on the returns here. I'm guessing that economies
    of scale need to kick in later to make this work.
     
    deadmail, Jun 19, 2004
    #29
  10. Christofire

    Ben Guest

    The bloke had a few quid, didn't he?

    This bit I found interesting:

    "1992 - The Daytona 1200 is launched at the NEC show in Birmingham,
    with a claimed 147bhp, higher than allowed on British roads."

    I always thought the 125bhp limit was a voluntary limit?
     
    Ben, Jun 19, 2004
    #30
  11. Christofire

    Mark Olson Guest

    If I had an oxyacetylene outfit, I might well do that. Acksherly,
    I have a MAPP gas torch now, that is hot enough to do brazing.
    I'll bet it would do the trick quite easily, too.

    But, if you exercise a modicum of care, the Dremel method works
    fine and has little risk. As I said, no need to grind all the way
    through, just enough to weaken the beast so it will crack when the
    BFH is applied. Much quicker than carting the works off somewhere.
     
    Mark Olson, Jun 19, 2004
    #31
  12. Christofire

    Mark Olson Guest

    I've got just a simple single bottle thingy that uses MAPP or propane
    fuel, no oxy bottle involved. Using MAPP fuel it gets hot enough to
    soften stubborn studs or shift nearly anything automotive that needs
    heating to remove.

    I used to have a proper oxyacetylene rig when I was a lad, my dad
    borrowed one from the widow next door whose husband had been a weldor.
    My dad, having welded Liberty ships in Superior WI during WWII and
    truck bodies for a few years after that, knew a bit about welding,
    and passed some of it on to me. Unfortunately the widow's son
    learned of the whereabouts of the rig some years and many bottles of
    gas later, and plucked it back.

    The fun that can be had burning things up with the gas axe cannot be
    comprehended by the average joe who hasn't had the pleasure.
     
    Mark Olson, Jun 20, 2004
    #32
  13. Christofire

    Verdigris Guest

    Face it, Andy: you're going to be called a **** again anyway. Might as
    well get a few laughs first.
     
    Verdigris, Jun 21, 2004
    #33
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.