Stan Mould's nasty little game...

Secret communication between judges and croft)))) what have you done for the
judges croft, for them to communicate secretly with you )))

Obi

 

Actually, *that* should be 'tenterhooks'.

Hmmm.

 

<snip>

In the meantime, we

*What* a twonk.

 

Thanks for putting the odious Scrotum right, Eddie. Did you know he
also posts as 'Chippy' uin uk.railway, where he is also just as
reviled?

Most people think he was also the deeply unpleasant person known as
Horace Eccles who wished various persons got cancer and died, just
before he pretended he'd got a new job and house move and sodded off
for a while, leaving everyone much happier.

Others, including me, think he is the German-based brother of the OP,
the pathetically insane David Husband of Dorset, who is completely and
utterly obsessed with me to the point it has driven him even further
insane. Indeed, both of them seem to suffer the same familial
insanity.

 

Well, that light-hearted post went down well, didn't it? Of course,
levity isn't something that you can handle very well, is it, Seepage?
The pomposity, self-importance, and boastful nature rather get in the
way.

On the subject of posting identities: We haven't seen you using the
'Blueyonder Stan' name, lately. Why is that?

How do you know that Mr Eccles did not get a new job and house? And
aren't you forgetting the numerous times that you have insisted that I
am Mr Eccles? You must have been wrong on all those occasions.

Beyond the reasoning: 'Scorer is in Germany. David Husband has a
brother in Germany. Therefore Scorer is David Husband's brother',
upon what do you base that assertion?

Let's talk about familial/genetic problems. For instance, you
inherited your mother's B12 deficiency, and, as your half-brother
apparently doesn't suffer from AD/HD, that, too, probably came from
your mother's side.

You, in turn, passed the defect to at least one of your offspring.

It is a great pity that your father didn't show a little more
self-restraint (though the lack of such control is one thing that has
obviously passed to you from the paternal side).

 

You? Light-hearted? Not ever, me old malice-filled Scrote. You
wouldn't know a joke if it hit you on the head and said 'ha, ha, ha,
wasn't that funny?'.

Of course,

Mirror? I've never seen you EVER take a pop at yourself. You can
only ever do that to others, as you hide behind the cloak of
anonymity, you poison-filled old Scrote.

Hah!! This from the pompous oaf who tries to fool people he knows how
IQ tests are constructed, what the scoring systems are, and can
predict someonme else's IQ from never having met them, and knowing
nothing about them. Quack, quack, Mr Duck. Do you sell snake oil for
a living?

Don't you know? I haven't seen Suzanne Croft or Mike Dean posting
from NTL either. Why is that?

Because I don't believe a word you or your other poison-filled
Doppelganger say, that's why.

And

'Must have been wrong'? What an odd turn of phrase. Why 'must' I
have been wrong? People on uk.railway or uk.diy seem to have a shrewd
idea who you are, and you are most certainly posting as Chippy on
uk.railway, because I have been sent the proof from someone else who
is disgusted at you. You were singularly dafter than you usually are
when you dropped yourself in it for all to mock and know even more
about you.

'Beyond the reasoning'? WTF does that mean? You are displaying your
appalling cognictive procesing yet again, with that little leap of
ill-logic (sic) yet again, Scrotum/Chippy/Eccles and no doubt many
more unpleasant examples of the failures of humankind.

Although I have to wonder why you are always so solicitous of the
other appalling member of your appalling family.

No, I did not. Wrong again. You are so desperate to find something,
anything, to try to demonstrate my shortcomings so as to bolster your
own fragile ego, that you get even the most basic of facts quite,
quite, wrong. Yet again.

How many simple errors of cognitive processing have I pulled you up
over to date, Scrote? It has to be in the dozens.

and, as your half-brother

Would you know? Or even be able to guess? And what about other
family members? Could you know? Or even be able to guess, with that
inability of yours to process information in even the the most
inadequate of forms?


that, too, probably came from

See above. You could not be more wrong. Although you are plainly
trying to insult me about my mother, knowing that doing so to anyone
is a emotive subject. What a pscyhopathic lout you are.

Defect? What defect? Surely not YOUR defect of personality?

Oh, what a boring, predictable idiot you are. You plainly have a
complete inability to acurately process information. That's
demonstrable over the time you have posted here. You make wild
guesses as to the truth, hoping to glean a little more information
from an angry denial of your fantasies. You have a malignant and
thoroughly repellent manner.

You just HAVE to be of the Husberk ilk.

 

You? Light-hearted? Not ever, me old malice-filled Scrote. You
wouldn't know a joke if it hit you on the head and said 'ha, ha, ha,
wasn't that funny?'.

Of course,

Mirror? I've never seen you EVER take a pop at yourself. You can
only ever do that to others, as you hide behind the cloak of
anonymity, you poison-filled old Scrote.

Hah!! This from the pompous oaf who tries to fool people he knows how
IQ tests are constructed, what the scoring systems are, and can
predict someonme else's IQ from never having met them, and knowing
nothing about them. Quack, quack, Mr Duck. Do you sell snake oil for
a living?

Don't you know? I haven't seen Suzanne Croft or Mike Dean posting
from NTL either. Why is that?

Because I don't believe a word you or your other poison-filled
Doppelganger say, that's why.

And

'Must have been wrong'? What an odd turn of phrase. Why 'must' I
have been wrong? People on uk.railway or uk.diy seem to have a shrewd
idea who you are, and you are most certainly posting as Chippy on
uk.railway, because I have been sent the proof from someone else who
is disgusted at you. You were singularly dafter than you usually are
when you dropped yourself in it for all to mock and know even more
about you.

'Beyond the reasoning'? WTF does that mean? You are displaying your
appalling cognictive procesing yet again, with that little leap of
ill-logic (sic) yet again, Scrotum/Chippy/Eccles and no doubt many
more unpleasant examples of the failures of humankind.

Although I have to wonder why you are always so solicitous of the
other appalling member of your appalling family.

No, I did not. Wrong again. You are so desperate to find something,
anything, to try to demonstrate my shortcomings so as to bolster your
own fragile ego, that you get even the most basic of facts quite,
quite, wrong. Yet again.

How many simple errors of cognitive processing have I pulled you up
over to date, Scrote? It has to be in the dozens.

and, as your half-brother

Would you know? Or even be able to guess? And what about other
family members? Could you know? Or even be able to guess, with that
inability of yours to process information in even the the most
inadequate of forms?


that, too, probably came from

See above. You could not be more wrong. Although you are plainly
trying to insult me about my mother, knowing that doing so to anyone
is a emotive subject. What a pscyhopathic lout you are.

Defect? What defect? Surely not YOUR defect of personality?

Oh, what a boring, predictable idiot you are. You plainly have a
complete inability to acurately process information. That's
demonstrable over the time you have posted here. You make wild
guesses as to the truth, hoping to glean a little more information
from an angry denial of your fantasies. You have a malignant and
thoroughly repellent manner.

You just HAVE to be of the Husberk ilk.

 

Of course I would - like many people, I've been laughing at you for
ages.

Mirror, mirror, on the wall
Who is the slyest of them all?
Let me see; if truth be told
'Tis little fat Stanley 'Seepage' Mould

[standard response to Seepage's 'mirror' comments]

It has happened, but not often. Want to know why it isn't often?
Because fuckers like you put the mockers on people making flippant
comments. For instance, a female poster made a joke about her kids
putting her to bed if she had too much to drink. As a result she was
repeatedly abused, and it was suggested that she was a poor parent.

I assume that this is what you are referring to:


"> I have an IQ of 154 as measured by Mensa, and 164 as measured by
the

This brings us back to the issue (previously discussed at length) of
the differences in the calibration of IQ tests, notably the unusual
scoring of the Cattel test as used by Mensa.

Your 154 on Mensa's Cattel test equates to about 135 or so on the more
widely accepted Wechsler or Stanford-Binet tests. But the 164 you
scored in the US, if from either of those two, would equal about 196
on the Cattel scale - a very considerable disparity.

However, if your US test was also a Cattel test, the difference in
scores would be more realistic, equating to about 140 for Wechsler or
143 for Stanford-Binet.

Assuming that both scores are Cattel tests, the mid-figure of 159
would equate to 137 and 139 on Wechsler and S-B respectively. So it
would be reasonable to say that your IQ is about 138 in the generally
accepted scoring system."

So, what do you disagree with in that analysis? Do you say that it is
factually wrong? If so, in what way?

You say that I believe that I "can predict someonme else's IQ from
never having met them". Assuming that you mean 'someone', and "never
having met them" (no "from"), I would suggest that the person who most
frequently pontificates on the subject of others' intelligence is
yourself.

I don't know. Why haven't you answered the question I asked?

Because if you make two statements formulated "Most people think..."
and "Others, including me..." it indicates that the latter is
disagreeing with the former.

What it says. You have based your assertion that I am David Husband's
brother upon that one piece of flawed reasoning.

Well, you wrote:

" That would almost be the reverse of my old mum. She was born in
Holland and had a father who was formally stateless but born in
Germany near the Polish border, and a mother who was born in Belgium
of French parents (from whom I seem to have inherited my
recently-diagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency - I only learnt in the
last fortnight that she had pernicious anaemia all her life)."

So I suppose that I should have said 'via your mother' to be
technically correct. The end result is the same, though.

I see that 'cognitive' is the Mot du jour (even if you do sometimes
spell it wrongly).

No, the genetic defect that causes your AD/HD and your allergies, and
which you passed to your son. I found it quite amusing when you
commented that Fleur's mother only wanted you as a sperm donor. After
all, who would pick a defective as a sperm donor?

Whereas your interpretation of your IQ scores was spot on, was it?

What's your next claim going to be - That you are a millionaire (but
in Turkish Lira)?

Do I?

 

But not as poor as you though you pathetic old fart.


Now why dont you tell everyone why I refuse to communicate with you. Go on
Hulberk tell them all that you threatened me with a court order to have my
true income revealed. Funnily enough though the judge said you could not
have one and that I had nothing to worry about.

And dont forget about your demanding to know how much my ex-husbands pay in
maintenance for their children will you.

TUT TUT silly old fart.

 

Oh, when was that Suzanne Croft posting as
?

I don't recall making application for such an order Suzanne:
fantasising again?[/QUOTE]

Maybe it was a private communication between Judge and cruft

Have they formed a cricket team

Maybe she forgot she had any "Ex Husbands"

Obi