Stan Mould's nasty little game...

From: "Blueyonder Stan Mould" <>
Newsgroups: uk.local.geordie
Subject: Re: Geordie Paki Shops
Message-ID: <vXbZa.2934$>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 20:28:27 +0100

Stan Mould:

Aren't you on benefits, Stan? How long have you been on benefits?

Stan Mould:

The reason for any court ordering any disclosure is to facilitate
further legal proceedings and for no other reason.

Stan Mould:

They could try, but in Stan Mould's case he is a paranoid who merely
imagines that people are after him. If people really were after him he
would have found himself in hospital (or dead) a long time ago. In
reality people very soon realise he is a loser, a hopeless paranoid
fantasist and malicious bullshitter with some sort of degenerative
mental affliction/problem.

Stan Mould:

Wrong! Anybody doing that will eventually fall foul of the PFHA 1997 as
Stan Mould will do in the fullness of time.

And here Stan Mould reveals his malice and the real reasons why he tries
very hard to get court orders to divulge personal information about
those he doesn't agree with.

Stan Mould proves, as others have said, that his sole purpose in
obtaining personal information is to publish it to the internet out of
malice and to use it for the further harassment of his many victims. See
below:

Stan Mould:

So out of malice Stan Mould will use confidential information to further
a campaign of malicious complaints as further harassment of his victims
as proved above.

How is your complaint to the Law Society about Mr Gold getting on, Stan?

What about that chap you are obsessed with in uk.legal you boast you got
sacked as a result of your complaints, Stan?

What about all these police officers you are on first name terms with,
Stan? Still informing to them?

Remember Stan, you admitted to being a police informer a little while
ago. I'll dig your post out and post it to prove it as I know you will
try to deny it.

Stan Mould:

Tell us all, Stan, why you were thrown off Blueyonder recently?

Stan Mould:

As usual you bullshit about the true situation.

The legal authorities are now wise to you and your fellow nutter James
Hulbert and to your many abuses of the legal system, so I expect in
future it will be very much harder for you to abuse any legal process.

Stan Mould:

Stan "Perry Mason-Mr Mensa-ex-SAS" Mould; in reality a nasty malicious
obsessed loser who pursues malicious obsessions against many different
people.

Bang! Bang!

 

is there any need to post this here. please go away

 

Where is "here" Marc?

GG

 

OK , cut that down to "Is there any need to post this"?

--
Alex

"I laugh in the face of danger"

"Then I hide until it goes away"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk

 

You can't stop being deceitful and dishonest can you, Jim?

The claim you refere to was one of many issued by you against a number
of uk.legal posters in a blatent abuse of the court system as part of
your own malicious campaign of harassment and bullying in order, one
assumes, to control the content of uk.legal (as Stan Mould also attempts
to do).

You chose David Husband as one of your "victims" because he exposed the
bogus web-site you set-up as part of your unrelenting harassment and
bullying of Fran Williams of Kent. Fran Williams subsequently suffered a
nervious breakdown as a direct consequence of your behaviour.

You were subsequently outmanoeuvred by your opponent David Husband and
you are unable to get over it.

You also took one out against Suzanne Croft and in a blatent contempt of
court and a deliberate abuse of the legal process you published
confidential personal details you obtained (as part of your legal
action) about her to the internet (as Stan Mould also does).

Your abuse of the legal system and court process is virtually identical
to the abuses your "pupil" Stan Mould inflicts upon the legal system.

Both Jim Hulbert and Stan Mould have now been "sussed" by the courts who
have been alerted to their many abuses of the legal system and both
Hulbert and Mould will find it much more difficult to abuse the system
in future.

BTW, Jim, you ought to see what the judges say about you in their
emails!

GG

 

YES, It *is* necessary to alert others to the activities of Mould and
his "hero" Hulbert, especially as Mould is now trying/offering to teach
others how to abuse the legal system by applying for court orders
against ISP's for the sole purpose of obtaining the personal information
of others for publication to the internet for malicious reasons. This
was what his original post in uk.local.geordie was about.

Wake Up! This is not a game on Mould's part! You may be his next
victim...

He is apparently attempting a large number of court applications to
ISP's to force the disclosure of email between ISP's customers. God
knows why. The man is a nutter and a menace, IMO, and the various ISP's
involved realise this now.

GG

 

Oh yes you are by attempting to suggest that the court is initiating the
claims. That is not true. A large number of claims were issued BY YOU
(at no cost to yourself) against various uk.legal posters. The court is
now wise to your abuses (and Mould's court abuses) and you will both
find it very difficult to abuse the system again in future.

In the one claim that has so far been determined, you lost and you have
been ordered to pay your opponents costs which you have said you would
never pay. That alone speaks volumes for your motives and lack of
integrity.

What do you think, knobhead?

GG

 

etc etc

LOL!

 

So, to cut a long story short, could all you Stan Mould, NTL and lawyer
wannabes kindly feck off posting this shite to ukrm. Its about as effective
as campaigning for the Croydon Road number 12 bus stop to be reinstated by
plastering Japanese sauna rooms with leaflets detailing how much it is
missed.

Or something.

 

Oh yes, here it is....

 

Yeah, take the pledge..

I understood Stan Mould threatened a number of people in uk.r.m a little
while ago?

GG

 

The trouble with the uk.legal muppets is that they don't stick to one
posting name for more than a day or so.
As a result you can't keep track of who is alleged to be posting as who this
week and it just ends up as a confused bunch of nobodies trading insults and
reposting all sorts of tat with mixed up attributions

--
Alex

"I laugh in the face of danger"

"Then I hide until it goes away"

www.drzoidberg.co.uk

 

Hmmm... Seems strangely familiar...

 

FFS use your Killfile and stop propogating these wankers!

 

Mash wrote

No. I think it is all rather jolly. Childish certainly but jolly as
well.

 

Actually, that should be 'tenter-hooks'.

(As well as being argumentative, we're very, very, pedantic.)

 

Japanese sauna rooms....I see we watch the same tv programmes, for research
purposes only, obviously. Copyright Pete Townshend.

 

Well I have news for you sunshine none of them were.

 

Do you think its wise to threaten someone who is possibly on first
name terms with the police in a public forum? And don't try to say
that it's not a threat as a judge certainly wouldn;t agree with
you. oh and BTW stop postin in uk.local.geordie we've got more
interesting things to read. Like proudy's bottom burps

cheers

Phil

 

David, didn't you post just recently saying it was wrong to post addresses, yet
here you are doing exactly that. Your obsession with Stan will get you into
trouble for your continued harassment. Take yourself in hand David or get orrice
to help you out ))

Obi