Speed Camera Detectors to be Banned!

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Mike, Jul 16, 2004.

  1. Mike

    Paul Robson Guest

    Also the A14 between Huntingdon and Cambridge - it's incredibly dangerous
    since the Scameras were put there.

    --
     
    Paul Robson, Jul 16, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  2. Mike

    IanAl Guest

    Yes I like to get off the main roads with their 40s & 50s and onto the
    winding country lanes with their (60mph) national limit.
     
    IanAl, Jul 16, 2004
    1. Advertisements

  3. Mike

    K Olley Guest

    Not all have lower limits for HGV, and even here there is very little
    enforcement within NSL area's.


    --

    Kevin - Basildon
    XV535
    GPZ305 (her's)
    BOTAFOT#67 BOTAFOF#23
    OSOS#29
     
    K Olley, Jul 16, 2004
  4. Mike

    Badger Guest

    [reposted to all groups]

    1. Dual carriageway to Single carriageway (70 to 60)
    2. NSL to 30 by dint of having street lighting at the requisite
    spacing (there's one of those near where I live)
     
    Badger, Jul 16, 2004
  5. Mike

    Badger Guest

    I should show you some slip roads near here, then.
     
    Badger, Jul 16, 2004
  6. Mike

    Owen Guest

    Nevermind the fact that now only the bad guys have guns... just like
    before really... Just wait 'till the government find out how many
    people die on the roads each year and ban cars, oh, that wouldn't be
    popular would it. Silly me, lucky we're not cynical eh?
    --
    O
    1 Black, shortly to undergo extensive surgery.
    1 Red, undergoing lightweight surgery. -----
    1 Blue, for Power-Ranger baiting. | o |
    Numbers ... | o |
    Stuff ... | ooo |
    Life ... -----
     
    Owen, Jul 17, 2004
  7. Pip raved thus:

    :: "¤¤¤ Abo ¤¤¤" <> struggled to ejaculate:
    ::
    ::: The Reids raved thus:
    :::
    ::::: all on pedestrian free low limit (30-40-50) dual carriageway. BTW
    ::::: Road Angel flashes before blackspots, which I thought was a
    ::::: gimmick but in practice I find it interesting to see where
    ::::: accidents have been frequent, of course many are random bits of
    ::::: high traffic volume motorway but others you can see where the
    ::::: problem is.
    :::
    ::: Just out of morbid interest, do you see skidmarks, damaged barriers
    ::: etc at any of the sites?
    ::
    :: Hell, yes. If you don't then you aren't looking. I'm assuming that
    :: you mean indicators of panic braking at camera sites in which case

    No, I'm wondering if there are any remains of incidents at the accident
    blackspots, which the P's device also displays.

    --

    Abo: spotter for #9 truck Pete 'Wilky' Wilkinson

    www.pickuptruckracing.com
    www.daysofthunder.co.uk
     
    ¤¤¤ Abo ¤¤¤, Jul 17, 2004
  8. Mike

    bryan Guest

    don't tell me... they'd drive a vulva.
     
    bryan, Jul 17, 2004
  9. Mike

    Gawnsoft Guest

    Or else they'll be glad that there was only one fatality out of three
    people, thanks to the relatively low collision speed.
    --
    Cheers,
    Euan
    Gawnsoft: http://www.gawnsoft.co.sr
    Symbian/Epoc wiki: http://html.dnsalias.net:1122
    Smalltalk links (harvested from comp.lang.smalltalk) http://html.dnsalias.net/gawnsoft/smalltalk
     
    Gawnsoft, Jul 17, 2004
  10. Mike

    Gawnsoft Guest

    Gawnsoft, Jul 17, 2004
  11. Mike

    Gawnsoft Guest

    Gawnsoft, Jul 17, 2004
  12. Mike

    Purditer Guest

    Why are drivers so concerned about breaking the new law on Dectectors when
    they don't give a sh1t about the breaking the laws on speed limits? Surely
    the same drivers will just ignore the new law as well?
     
    Purditer, Jul 17, 2004
  13. Mike

    Ian Henden Guest

    ..... at your peril.

    @Cos one day, there'll be a mobile parked just behind a hedge, Or in amongst
    a flock of sheep on the road (it *is* Wales!!)
     
    Ian Henden, Jul 17, 2004
  14. Mike

    Brimstone Guest

    Almost certainly.
     
    Brimstone, Jul 17, 2004
  15. Mike

    Badger Guest

    That'd be worrying!
     
    Badger, Jul 17, 2004
  16. Mike

    dwb Guest

    Did you read the line after that one?

    The DLR is still a supervised system - they have a bloke on board, and
    people monitoring them.

    So they're sort of automatic.

    And that's _one_ railway line - try expanding that out to however many
    million cars/roads we have, because you can be sure the motorist wouldn't be
    trusted (or probably even be trained) to deal with the computer in their car
    going *boom*.
     
    dwb, Jul 17, 2004
  17. Mike

    Networkguy Guest

    The SPECS at M1/M25 junction?
    There are no SPECS at the M1/M25 junction but you can always tell the people
    with GPS based detectors as they are the ones doing 70mph when passing the
    traffic flow cameras :)
     
    Networkguy, Jul 17, 2004
  18. in this country maybe but in France the VAL systems are completely
    unstaffed as is Meteor Line 14 in Paris. A new line in Singapore has no
    drivers or attendants on the trains.

    It is demonstrably clear that high capacity urban public transport
    provision will move towards having no staff on the trains as a matter of
    routine.
     
    Paul Corfield, Jul 17, 2004
  19. Mike

    Brimstone Guest

    Why not, they're allowed to deal with the consequences of the present
    system?
     
    Brimstone, Jul 17, 2004
  20. Mike

    IanAl Guest

    What bloke? A conductor? Can he take over control of the train in an
    emergency?

    There's no-one sitting in the front apart from passengers pretending
    to be drivers.
     
    IanAl, Jul 17, 2004
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.