SPECS on M4

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by CT, Nov 12, 2003.

  1. CT

    CT Guest


    False. According to this anyway:

    http://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/
     
    CT, Nov 12, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. CT

    Biker2 Guest

    Just received the following email warning about the use of SPECS on the M4.

    True or false ?

    << Those new electronic signs on the M4 were switched on this Tuesday. The
    bad
    news is that they are rigged with the SPECS speed cameras.
    SPECS is a computer-camera based system. As you go past the sign a digital
    camera reads your number plate. When you go past the next sign your number
    plate is read again. The computer 'knows' how far apart the signs are so it
    can work out your average speed between the two, or three or four.
    The system is fully automatic and will issue a ticket without any form of
    human intervention. It does this for every single vehicle that passes. You
    will not know you've been caught as the cameras don't flash.
    They work 24/7, 365 days a year, and theoretically, there's absolutely no
    limit on the number of tickets that the system can issue.
    The whole section of the M4 between Theale (J12) and Membury Services
    (between 14 and 15) is wired, both ways. The system is set to trigger a
    ticket at 78 mph. Radar detectors will be of no use as SPECS is entirely
    passive, there is no radar or laser beam to detect. >>

    Steve
     
    Biker2, Nov 12, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. CT

    serf Guest

    serf, Nov 12, 2003
    #3
  4. CT

    Biker2 Guest

    Just found http://thamesvalley.police.uk/ so it seems to be a hoax

    Steve
     
    Biker2, Nov 12, 2003
    #4
  5. CT

    Pip Guest

    Check FIRST, post later in future, eh?

    Looking at www.google.com /advanced search/ uk.rec.motorcycles would
    have revealed that we've done this fucker two or three times in the
    last couple of weeks in any case.

    In summary - well intentioned but ultimately fuckwitted.
     
    Pip, Nov 12, 2003
    #5
  6. CT

    flashgorman Guest

    Sorry to pull you on on this, but I'm *sure* we've already had a post on
    here about checking stuff on google first.
     
    flashgorman, Nov 12, 2003
    #6
  7. CT

    Pip Guest

    Really.

    Message references?
     
    Pip, Nov 12, 2003
    #7
  8. CT

    Switters Guest

    <fx: google.com/search?q=google >
    Error 500: Stack overflow
    Core dumped.
     
    Switters, Nov 12, 2003
    #8
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.