Interesting stuff. However that list includes rather nebulous 'spam support services' and it does not appear to trivial to get an block removed. It would probably be more economic for ISPs to wait until the automatic removal, even if they do satisfy the criteria for removal immediately -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l. Really, Sprint 1.7 Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
Wasn't when I did abuse See above. Part of this (from my POV) is that who the ****** are they to tell any ISP that such and such a customer should not be allowed to host servers on 'my' network. Economically if an ISP is hosting DNS type servers (as opposed to actual spamming servers), then having that range of IPs blocked is going to have 0 effect. Pulling the plug on paying customers OTOH..... Of that I also have some experience. Sometimes the first we heard was when customers started moaning. But that's just not true is it. They've porbably not been 'spewing' spam. They may have been running DNS requests for alleged spam groups OTOH. That is a very different thing IMHO Well, in this at least I agree Dunt actually mean it's any good though Sorry, not sure what you mean by this -- Catman MIB#14 SKoGA#6 TEAR#4 BOTAFOF#38 Apostle#21 Tyger, Tyger Burning Bright (Remove rust to reply) Alfa 116 Giulietta 3.0l. Really, Sprint 1.7 Triumph Speed Triple: Black with extra black bits www.cuore-sportivo.co.uk
