SORN petition

Discussion in 'Classic Motorbikes' started by Austin Shackles, Jan 24, 2008.

  1. Yebbut, if you buy one *with* tax, you say "good, it's got tax on it", and I
    for one didn't know that the SORN needed re-applying if you buy a SORNed
    one. I do now - the general perception though is that SORN is "instead of
    tax" and this is reinforced by the DVLA's own reminders which say "you must
    now either tax it or declare SORN" when it's due to expire.

    So unless you've done it before and found out, there's nothing to tell the
    average punter that if they buy a SORNed vehicle that it doesn't transfer to
    the new keeper the same as a tax disc would.
     
    Austin Shackles, Apr 25, 2008
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. Austin Shackles

    YTC#1 Guest

    And then when it runs out, you get a reminder, if you sent thye docs off,
    or a fine if you didn't
    re-applying if you buy a SORNed
    The tax disc belongs to the vehicle, not the keeper.
     
    YTC#1, Apr 26, 2008
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. quite so, but until it runs out you don't have to a damn thing.
    and it's not immediately obvious that the SORN doesn't. It doesn't say
    anything about SORN on the V5 in the notes about transferring it - not even
    in the bit about continuous registration. In fact, it's damned silly (which
    is no surprise) that the SORN doesn't stick to the vehicle, seeing as it's
    the vehicle that has to be insured, taxed and MOT'd for use on the road, not
    the keeper.

    Of course, they could solve it by issuing a SORN disc in place of the tax
    disc, then it would all be simple and plain and you'd know (by looking at
    the disc) when it was due to expire - also the disc could stay with the
    vehicle when it was transferred... But that'd mean that they'd lose out on
    the chance to fine you for not doing something which it's not apparent that
    you should need to do.
     
    Austin Shackles, Apr 26, 2008
    #43
  4. Austin Shackles

    Pip Luscher Guest

    "Never attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by
    incompetence"
     
    Pip Luscher, Apr 26, 2008
    #44
  5. Austin Shackles

    YTC#1 Guest

    You are a bitter man :)
     
    YTC#1, Apr 26, 2008
    #45
  6. Austin Shackles

    platypus Guest

    YM 'adequately'
     
    platypus, Apr 26, 2008
    #46
  7. Austin Shackles

    Pip Luscher Guest

    IPD
     
    Pip Luscher, Apr 26, 2008
    #47
  8. I've just about had enough of the various sneaky underhand ways the
    government rip us off these days. At least when we had 30% income tax you
    knew they were ripping you off up front.

    It's all the stealth taxes that annoy me, and the stupid stuff like taxing
    domestic fuel, so that then you have to make special payments to the poor so
    they can afford to heat their house.
     
    Austin Shackles, Apr 27, 2008
    #48
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.