I just had a glimpse at some of those pics. You guys are COOOOL dudes & dude-esses. Who mows the grass at the track. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
sorry to hear about the off, Clem, since you're stuck here till the weekend perhaps a counselling session at a suitable hostelry somewhere between gNat's hospital and Warburton should be arranged...
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:52:55 +1300 Umm... if a big boofy bloke can't handle it safely, then obviously size and blokeness aren't criteria for who can handle it safely. If everyone is going to go tits up on it, then either no one rides it or anyone who wants to does. Zebee
Umm that sounds like sensible feminine reasoning then Zebee? That's about the size of it I guess. Without training wheels (grin) anyone could end up losing control, just like Clem did, at 40 kph didn't he say? I believe anyone, male or female with bulky and strong physique could enjoy owning and riding an 1100GS but they would need to be careful not to "go tits up on it." Anyone of small build would IMHO be unwise to own or ride one of these otherwise great bikes. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:57:22 +1000 Or any small machine. After all, it's what "losing control" means. Zebee
That's sensible Mr H. Just as well you have that Kwaka AND the commonsense to stay off the BMW until you are ready and able to safely ride it again. Hope you get over the surgery soon. By the way, I'm a fan of all BMW bikes but unfortunately can't afford one right now. One day soon I hope. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
I've gotta disagree with you there Zebee. I'm sure that smaller lighter bikes are a lot easier to control because the weight factor between the bike and the rider is less than with large machines. Imagine for a moment if a light person with average strength rides a large heavy bike, which suddenly for whatever reason, leans to one side the light person would have less weight to use to lean in the opposite direction to balance the bike back into control than would a strong heavier person. Weight distribution is what it's about, and the strength to move that weight to where it's needed quickly. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
No it was Zebee who was making the joke (about feet touching the ground). It was a reference to a previous thread (and bunfight) about short-arses riding tall bikes. I was warning YOU to always assume there's an in-joke! Clem
~ And that's just my lunch-box! Thanks for the defence Smee but I only know how to ride bikes.... I really have never learned how to crash them properly! Clem
Thanks Clem, now I understand what you meant. Hope you & your daughter recover quickly. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
Funnily enough; after I got out of hospital in 1983 and was very weak I couldn't ride my little Ducati 500SL Pantah so I had to use my mate's Z1300 until I was fitter! Clem
Without wishing to get into an argument; I'm quite certain that I would've crashed ANY bike (that I've ever ridden anyway) in that same circumstance. It was just a bit of a one-in-a-million event and I wasn't good-enough, smart-enough or alert-enough to get through it. If anything, that big left cylinder (and pannier) kept the weight of the bike off us and saved us further injuries.... Clem
I wasn't taking the piss. I thought the track looks very tidy with neat lawns around it. To keep lawns that neat in NZ you'd need to mow them weekly. You must have different grass and of course climate. --<KeroseneCowboy>--
Technically Zero! The BMW hasn't actually been assessed yet, and the Triumph and the Pantah were rebuilt. (And everything else made it back home afterwards!) Clem