Society benefits from education

I certainly agree with this everytime I see that **** Harry Hill.

The thousands spent on his medical education were certainly a fantastic
investment for the country.

 

Along similar lines, what were all those evil investment bankers doing
5-10 years ago? Studying at university. What will many of those
students protesting about the fees be doing in 5-10 years time? Taking
risks on the financial markets for their employers, enjoying their
bonuses, & not giving a flying **** if their actions screw things up
for the next generation of students.

 

Don't be absurd!

They will become politically aware through the process and this will
lead to us entering a new enlightened age through activism.

 

Yay! And all religious militants will turn into fluffy bunny wabbits
that poo gold, Egyptian sharks will evolve into off-shore rescue boats,
& scientist will discover how to turn one cubic foot of air into one
thousand gallons of petrol by telling it a funny joke.

 

But... then gold will have no value.

 

The country got its investment back in income tax.
But he's a good argument for pay-per-view television.
Pay-per-listen radio would be good too, showing how many people
actually want to listen to **** Arthur Strong.

 

Which it would have done whether or not he did a medical degree...

Hmm.. how much would they pay me to watch Harry Hill?

 

Yeah, but some of those are funny.

His point is what? Humourous diversion?

I think he doesn't feel guilty about wasting society's money and robbing
someone else of the opportunity to study medicine.

Personally I'd rather he *was* a doctor and treating other people.

 

wrote:

Don't forget the thousands spent on the two degrees I dropped out of.

Best investment ever!

 

wrote:

And TV Burp is one of the best things on tv. Which is quite an
achievement considering the quality of the programmes it takes the piss
out of.

I bet the cost of his medical education was a bit less than six billion
quid though, eh?

 

Well, yes. His medical degree hasn't given him his comedy career.

 

Do you really believe that?

Yes, I think so.

Not sure what relevance that figure has to me though. You do know that
I work within a product development team rather than in a finance role?

 

wrote:

The first sentence? Yeah, it's great. It's not exactly highbrow, but
it's fucking funny.

Evil by association, obviously.

 

His humour isn't based on medicine or medical knowledge.

 

"ogden" wrote in message

wrote:

hmm, but which is better? Ogden, or Stephen Packer......

 

He does. Amazing isn't it? Perfect proof that tastes differ, & ogden &
I seem to have completely opposite tastes in just about everything.

Whenever I put something on Facebook about something I saw/heard that I
thought was good, you can guarantee the first response will be ogden
saying "it's shit". Which I generally take as confirmation that it is
indeed good.

 

Likewise Jonathan Miller and Graham Chapman.

 

For Sale

 

My pre Xmas diving holiday in Sharm got me a rather good T shirt of a
shark about to eat a snorkeller who is saying "So far, so good!"

Within days of the elderly lady being killed by a shark most of the T
shirt shops we filled with humorous Shark T shirts. I asked who was
buying them when I got mine and the answer was "Mainly Brits."

 

I'd have to disagree vehemently, Harry Hill is about as funny as
genital mutilation.