[URL]http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=34277[/URL] If one assumes where there is smoke there is fire, then we should hear some sort of OEM-DMG compromise at Laguna or shortly thereafter. If you throw in what the promoters have been saying as well, then I think that'll mean retention of at least some of the existing classes for at least one more year; I don't see how DMG gets all the horses into the corral without that concession. So what would that look like? A SB class, of course, and that might be any of the three possibilities - current AMA, '09 proposed AMA, or WSB. WSB seems the least likely, given that the Euro OEMs that obviously prefer that aren't even going to be racing in it. If this is a one-year truce, then existing rules are most likely, and WSB almost certain for 2010. But if they want to extend beyond next year, then the proposed rules move to the front of the line, because they reduce costs some and Yamaha will most likely want that (as the most testicularly-challenged Japanese OEM). Next up is SSport, which all of the Japanese OEMs must want, including Yamaha. ASB/SStock is likely to be jettisoned, because DMG only has proposed it as a way to bleed participation off of the hated FSB and then to fill out the schedule with FSB dropped, and only Suzuki seems to be supporting retention of SStock, which is logical given their penetration and success currently. FX is mostly Honda's baby, and that only stays if DMG concedes DSB, which seems very unlikely to me. So a reasonable compromise would be to run DSB under whatever rules DMG wants, also run SSport for the Japanese OEMs, with supported teams also running in DSB. That leaves the American and European OEMs out in the cold with their literbikes if they don't run SB, but they have DSB still. And it gives DMG their shot at making this class concept work. I really don't see DMG conceding the dyno/scale limitations in DSB in order to get the OEMs to run their 600s there, because it really ruins their concept and it makes running the bigger stuff almost impossible. And would the OEMs want to showcase their 600s agains 900-1000 twins? So that route seems unlikely. The really tough stuff starts to hit when they get to weekend schedule, purse, television, spec tires, unobtainium, etc. SSport would obviously have only one race, SB would need to be the feature to get the OEMs to sign off, but DMG is unlikely to bury their DSB. So maybe DSB and SB on Saturday and SB, DSB and SSp on Sunday, which is the same five-race schedule as used now. SB won't include any of the "approved parts list" stuff, of course, but spec tires might just be a concession they'd make, particularly if the partner ends up being Dunlop. SSp is likely the same, although it's conceivable that a concession on homologated parts might be made, in part to allow class crossover between SSp and DSB. DSB will have all that spec racing crap, of course, and DMG may not be willing to concede anything in order to encourage crossover, which they may not really want anyway. My bet is current SB and SSp rules with competitive tires, ASB/SSt and FX dumped, DSB as already proposed, and doubleheaders for both SB and DSB, biggest purse in DSB and none in SSp, all pro licenses, one year only. Then they start all over again...