Snuff Movies.

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by The Old Fogey, Nov 26, 2003.

  1. From last week's Telegraph:

    136 mph biker records his death
    A motorcyclist who attached a camcorder to his machine
    ended up recording his own death, an inquest has heard.
    Elliott Coe, 29, a factory supervisor from South Wotton,
    Norfolk, filmed himself speeding at 136 mph after setting
    up his camera to record the speedometer on his Suzuki
    GSXR 600 at Tilney cum Islington, near King's Lynn,
    where he hit a tree.
    Bill Knowles, the West Norfolk Coroner, recorded a verdict
    of accidental death.

    I wonder if the next of kin sent it to Kirsty's Home Videos?
     
    The Old Fogey, Nov 26, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. The Old Fogey

    Rexx Guest

    And on how your speedo works.
    I think that trick would work with mine as my speedo connects somewhere on
    the engine casing, rather than as with the CBR (to the front wheel).
     
    Rexx, Nov 26, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. The Old Fogey

    flashgorman Guest

    And 136mph would be a *bad* time to find out that your paddock stand was in
    fact not that robust at all. Would make an entertaining complaint down the
    paddock stand shop though.
     
    flashgorman, Nov 26, 2003
    #3
  4. The Old Fogey

    Rexx Guest

    Nice enclosed-space burnout before the end, though!
     
    Rexx, Nov 26, 2003
    #4
  5. The Old Fogey

    Alan.T.Gower Guest

    stand.......


    .............and the size of your balls.

    --
    Alan

    http://www.ads-training.co.uk
    "Kneesliders Sponsored by Cane"
    GSX-R1000 , Triumph Thunderbird, ZXR750L2 Racer(gone), GS500,
    GHPOTHUF#27
    TGF, UKRMFBC#7, Two#24, BOTAFOF#11, YTC#9, GYASB#1. SbS#23.
    DFWAG#2, DS#2, DIAABTCOD#20. remove "thisbit" in the reply
    http://sportsbike.org (our own endurance team) http://Team-ukrm.com
    "Nemo repente fuit turpissimus"
     
    Alan.T.Gower, Nov 26, 2003
    #5
  6. The Old Fogey

    dwb Guest

    Slightly confused.. are you saying that you stick it on the paddack stand
    then rev it up?
    That would require a gear box/rear wheel based speedo wouldn't it?
    Interesting bit of physics too... :)

    That said, I'm not actually sure where the GSX-R reads it's speed from.
     
    dwb, Nov 27, 2003
    #6
  7. The Old Fogey

    dwb Guest

    Only 136? Poof - the 600 can overread by more then that!

    Still, what a silly thing to do.
     
    dwb, Nov 27, 2003
    #7
  8. The Old Fogey

    deadmail Guest

    And... since there's no wind resistance you could no doubt get the bike
    up to a fine old indicated speed.

    I think I'd want to strap the fucking thing down before I took it to
    high speeds like that.

    I'd also have to work hard on stopping myself from jamming my knob into
    the chain/sprocket interface to "see what it's like".
     
    deadmail, Nov 27, 2003
    #8
  9. The Old Fogey

    Champ Guest

    It would.
    Er, not very.
    The gearbox. Which is why I know that the highest speed I've attained
    while pulling a wheelie is 134mph. Good ld Suzuki.
     
    Champ, Nov 27, 2003
    #9
  10. The Old Fogey

    andrewr Guest

    I'm not sure that you would on my bike, because of the ram-air thing. When I
    took my last 6R out without any bodywork and, hence, the ram air not being set
    up, it wouldn't pull more than about 70mph in top.
    I think, somehow, I'd manage to resist that temptation.

    --
    AndrewR, D.Bot (Celeritas)
    Kawasaki ZX-6R J1
    BOTAFOT#2,ITJWTFO#6,UKRMRM#1/13a,MCT#1,DFV#2,SKoGA#0 (and KotL)
    BotToS#5,SBS#25,IbW#34, TEAR#3 (and KotL), DS#5, Keeper of the TFSTR#
    The speccy Geordie twat.
     
    andrewr, Nov 27, 2003
    #10
  11. The Old Fogey

    dwb Guest

    Well no, as long as it stays on the paddock stand. If it doesn't, or isn't
    balanced properly or whatever... would be a good video to watch ;)

    What would a bike, with a back wheel 'doing' 150mph actually do if you
    dropped it - flip?
    Ta.
     
    dwb, Nov 27, 2003
    #11
  12. The Old Fogey

    Ben Guest

    There is a sensor on the front sprocket.
     
    Ben, Nov 27, 2003
    #12
  13. The Old Fogey

    Champ Guest

    Of course, I meant to type "Good Old Suzuki", but that's one of the
    best Freudian slips I've ever seen!
     
    Champ, Nov 27, 2003
    #13
  14. The Old Fogey

    Big Tim Guest

    Make a mess..

    ....of itself, you, the garage, the video camera - you are going to
    video it, aren't you?
     
    Big Tim, Nov 27, 2003
    #14
  15. The Old Fogey

    Champ Guest

    But seriously - I can't think of a better actualisation of the
    uncontrolled Id than a gixxer thou :)
     
    Champ, Nov 27, 2003
    #15
  16. The Old Fogey

    CT Guest

     
    CT, Nov 27, 2003
    #16
  17. The Old Fogey

    Pip Guest

    <slap>

    "Penny".

    Singular, it is "penny".

    Plural, "pennies" or "pence". One is singular.
     
    Pip, Nov 27, 2003
    #17
  18. The Old Fogey

    CT Guest


    Penny and pennies denotes a number of coins. Pence denotes
    a price regardless of wether that price requires one or
    more pennies to pay it.
     
    CT, Nov 27, 2003
    #18
  19. The Old Fogey

    Pip Guest

    Really? Are you sure about that? I would say that a penny is just
    that, one single penny. Pennies (or pence) would refer to more than
    one penny, see. That's how pluralisation works.

    How you come to the conclusion about pence and price is beyond me atm.

    Let's see your proof, then - here's mine ...

    " Main Entry: pence
    Pronunciation: 'pen(t)s
    plural of PENNY "

    And where did the sheep come into it?
     
    Pip, Nov 27, 2003
    #19
  20. The Old Fogey

    CT Guest

    It was how I seemed to remember using it as a kid. I'm sure
    I would refer to a sweet priced at '1d' as costing 'one pence'.
    I know. One penny, two or more pennies for a number of coins.
    From Wikipedia:

    "The plural of 'penny' is 'pence' when referring to a quantity of money
    and
    'pennies' when referring to a number of coins."

    So I was sort of half right. Well in my mind, anyway. :eek:)

    Eh?
     
    CT, Nov 27, 2003
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.