Smart Paper & TrafPol tickets

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005.

  1. We develop smart paper apps here ( you know, manually write on the
    special paper with digital pen and it magically appears on the network
    as a digital document in legible type, via voodoo ) .

    One of the apps ( not ours, I hasten to say! ) this has been used for
    is for a Police Force, principally their TrafPol section. The rolling
    speed camera units ( i.e. in car cameras ) had been restricted to
    issuing no more than 30 tickets per oficer per shift, as the manual
    paperwork back at the office would take up too much time if they
    exceeded this.

    However since they introduced a smart paper app whereby the ticket is
    written in the car at the time of the offence then transmitted back to
    TrafPol HQ via Bluetooth, the officer only has to verify the manifest
    at the end of the shift to agree with what's been issued.

    The new record for any one officer on an 8 hour shift is 278 tickets,
    seemingly.

    Three guesses where this might be in use?
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Dave Jennings:
    Narnia? ;-)
     
    frjack at work, Nov 14, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. NW. ( NoWhere near, obv...)
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #3
  4. Dave Jennings

    MikeH Guest

    Not being transmitted via a custom version of Bluetooth called
    Brunsteeth, by any chance?
     
    MikeH, Nov 14, 2005
    #4
  5. You may think that, however I of course couldn't possibly comment".
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #5
  6. I know. I forgot to say in my OP- the pilot cost 500k for a 50 pen
    system, with a scheduled breakeven point of 18 months.

    7 months into the trial it's bought and paid for itself already.
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #6
  7. Dave Jennings

    MikeH Guest

    D'you reckon riding round with a very strong Bluetooth transmitter
    turned on in my pocket[1] would discourage them from giving me a writeup
    due to *real* paperwork being needed?

    [1] Is that Bluetooth in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?
     
    MikeH, Nov 14, 2005
    #7
  8. MikeH wrote:> D'you reckon riding round with a very strong Bluetooth
    transmitter
    Inspirational. I applaud your efforts.
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #8
  9. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Dave Jennings
    A *very* strong argument for contesting each and every ticket in court,
    it would seem.

    --
    Wicked Uncle Nigel - There are few things in life more sinister than a
    public toilet with the lid closed.

    WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
    SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
    Honda GL1000K2 (On its hols) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
    Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Yamaha GTS1000
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Nov 14, 2005
    #9
  10. Dave Jennings

    MikeH Guest

    I reckon most magistrates could easily say "Speeding? Guilty. Hang him.
    Next" 278 times on one 8-hour sitting though.
     
    MikeH, Nov 14, 2005
    #10
  11. Hmm. Process is that the offender verifies the ticket accuracy before
    it's "signed off", thereby any data that's transmitted has been agreed
    / admitted to.

    Now, to make it sneakier, the software that transcribes from
    handwriting to typed data can verify individuals handwriting, so knows
    which officer issued it even if for some reason someone queries it. The
    pens are "logged on" prior to use and "off" after, so the data is time
    stamped so making it impossible for someone to add to the notes after
    the event without the specific individual being identified.
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #11
  12. Dave Jennings

    Eiron Guest

    In that case it is physically impossible to get 278 victims in 8 hours.
     
    Eiron, Nov 14, 2005
    #12
  13. Dave Jennings

    MikeH Guest

    The shorthand of the law?
     
    MikeH, Nov 14, 2005
    #13
  14. Dave Jennings

    'Hog Guest

    It's a video car, they don't need to stop you! I don't know what they
    have to write up in the car though.

    'Hog
     
    'Hog, Nov 14, 2005
    #14
  15. Dave Jennings

    Eiron Guest

    HTF do they get you to agree and sign if they don't stop you?
     
    Eiron, Nov 14, 2005
    #15
  16. Dave Jennings

    MikeH Guest

    You are deemed to have agreed if you don't complain at the time of the
    alledged offence[1]. It's a bit like NIPs being posted.

    [1] It's not their fault if you don't hear them say "Excuse me sonny".
     
    MikeH, Nov 14, 2005
    #16
  17. You're right, my misunderstanding.

    It seems that the mobile cars don't stop you but there is attached
    paperwork that at the end of the shift the officer needs to deal with,
    but instead, if my chat with the wallah involved in this is accurate,
    with the new system they can and do write the paperwork whilst in the
    car, and this is transmitted back to HQ for them to validate at the end
    of the shift.

    HTH.
     
    Dave Jennings, Nov 14, 2005
    #17
  18. Dave Jennings

    Wik Guest

    Wow! How many megawatts is the transmitter?
     
    Wik, Nov 14, 2005
    #18
  19. Dave Jennings

    sweller Guest

    <wince>
     
    sweller, Nov 15, 2005
    #19
  20. Dave Jennings

    PeterT@Home Guest

    Wik proposed
    Just what I thought. Bluetooth?
     
    PeterT@Home, Nov 16, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.