Sept 28. London Demo against Westminster Council M/C parking charges

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Julian Bond, Sep 21, 2008.

  1. Julian Bond

    Julian Bond Guest

    Hanover Square W1, 10:30am Sunday 28th September Details here
    http://forum.notobikeparkingfees.com

    Motorcyclists in London face some challenges; staying out of the
    congestion charge; being allowed to ride in bus lanes, lack of parking
    space; lack of secure parking. But now Westminster council have added a
    new one by introducing a trial scheme to charge for M/C parking. The
    justification is increased parking space and security devices. They have
    added some spaces but the security devices are only being tested in a
    couple of residents only bays. The charging scheme involves a broken
    system of pre-registering, dealing with call centres and mobile phone
    texting. Make no mistake about it, this is a revenue generation scheme
    with a stated and planned pay back in under 2 years. And the big part of
    the revenue is not from the £1.50 per day charge but the £60/120 fines.
    And you can be sure that if it's allowed to succeed, the price will go
    up and it will be adopted by other councils in London.

    So please come and support the demo. If nothing else it's an excuse to
    stand around talking about bikes! And then go and write to the council
    and if you can, hand deliver the letter and get a signature for it.
     
    Julian Bond, Sep 21, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Julian Bond

    TD Guest

    I'll come along. Fucking scandalous. I had to pay in Westminster a couple of
    weeks ago and I couldn't believe it. They even have an 08 number, which
    doesn't come out of my mobile contract inclusive minutes. What about people
    without mobiles / credit cards / whatever? <fx: head explodes with anger>
     
    TD, Sep 23, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Poor people?

    **** 'em.
     
    The Older Gentleman, Sep 23, 2008
    #3
  4. Julian Bond

    jbond Guest

    jbond, Sep 26, 2008
    #4
  5. Might see you there then.
     
    Whinging Courier, Sep 26, 2008
    #5
  6. Julian Bond

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    Why should I give a flying **** if you have to pay to park your
    motorbike in London?
     
    Andy Bonwick, Sep 26, 2008
    #6
  7. Julian Bond

    Julian Bond Guest

    Have you found the delete key on your PC yet?
     
    Julian Bond, Sep 27, 2008
    #7
  8. Julian Bond

    Julian Bond Guest

    As it turns out that was a bit of a craic. Had a little ride out with
    maybe 200 bikes and brought Regent street and Oxford st to a standstill
    for 15 minutes.
     
    Julian Bond, Sep 29, 2008
    #8
  9. Maybe you shouldn't... but just as the congestion charge is, IIRC, due
    to be put into place in other major cities in the UK in the near
    future, this is something that is likely to set a precedent for other
    councils to follow.

    So whilst it doesn't affect you directly at the present, (assuming you
    never have cause to ride into London and park of course), what follows
    may do, and yes, I can fully appreciate in the grand scheme of things
    it's something that's pretty insignificant and perhaps not worthy of
    ranting about, but then sometimes it's the little things that all add
    up to one big pile of steaming shit?
     
    jackhackettuk, Sep 29, 2008
    #9
  10. Julian Bond

    Andrew998 Guest

    It's the thin end of the wedge! Fancy expecting motorcyclists to pay for
    parking. It's obvious that their parking should be subsidized by all the
    local council tax payers.
     
    Andrew998, Sep 29, 2008
    #10
  11. Julian Bond

    platypus Guest

    You mean, like the bacon-slicing of civil liberties? Surely not.
     
    platypus, Sep 29, 2008
    #11
  12. We live in the UK, with its fair and just society and values,
    remember... not some sweaty repressive dictatorship.
     
    jackhackettuk, Sep 29, 2008
    #12
  13. And how exactly is their parking subsidised by local council tax
    payers?

    Painting a few white lines once in a blue moon doesn't cost that much,
    and FWIW, the bays that were set up outside the office in Covent
    Garden I worked out of up until March this year, weren't existing,
    revenue generating car bays they'd converted, either.

    Where there are now bays, there were double yellows previously.
     
    jackhackettuk, Sep 29, 2008
    #13
  14. Julian Bond

    Andrew998 Guest

    So painting lines is free? And just because you cite an example of where
    they found extra space doesn't mean they are all like that. And if there
    are fewer cars and more bikes coming in their revenue is dropping anyway.

    I just don't see any logic in suggesting cars should pay but bikes should be
    exempt. Even the argument that we should be encouraging people out of cars
    doesn't stand up because bike parking is cheaper than car parking.
     
    Andrew998, Sep 29, 2008
    #14
  15. No, but I'm pretty damn sure the cost of doing that is nowhere near
    the amount of revenue they'll generate from charging for the spaces
    concerned.
    Is it?

    Only, the last time I looked, the cuntgestion charge was payable to
    TFL, and not City of Westminster cuntcil... or are you referring to
    parking tickets etc, in which case I have no sympathy.
    A logic which has, up until now, worked fine?
    And so it should be - a bike takes up far less space than a car, ergo
    they can probably get five for the price of one, so to speak, maybe
    more depending on how big the bay concerned is.
     
    jackhackettuk, Sep 29, 2008
    #15
  16. Julian Bond

    Andrew998 Guest

    Painting the lines isn't the only cost involved but even if it is, you are
    paying for a service that is provide by the council and they can reasonably
    make a profit from it to the benefit of local residents.
    Well if it encourages people out of cars onto bikes it will.
    Where did congestion charge and parking tickets come into it. We are talking
    about paying to park.
    So? Just because something's always been that way doesn't make it right.
    Exactly. So you are agreeing with me that there isn't an argument for bikes
    to be free?

    The only reason for this campaign seems to be a narrow self interest in not
    wanting to pay. I can see that you might not want to start paying after
    years of not having to but that really isn't enough for me. I look at the
    case on its merits.
     
    Andrew998, Sep 29, 2008
    #16
  17. It's a public road, something which you pay VED to use, funnily
    enough.
    See below regarding the demand on car bays...
    They're still factors - have you spent any time in Central London
    lately?

    I suspect not - car bays are still oversubscribed as a rule from what
    I've seen, and most of the additional bike bays around Covent Garden
    at least, are new bays, not converted existing car bays.

    This is merely a case of trying to generate more money, not cover
    losses.
    So no need to change it, then... unless you're looking to screw as
    much money as possible from your captive audience who can of course
    vote with their feet and go by public transport... only, the screws
    have been turned on that a fair bit in the last couple of years as
    well, cost wise.
    Or wrong.
    No, I'm not agreeing with you at all I'm afraid.

    I can see exactly why the council are doing it - to generate *more*
    income for their coffers. And then there's the way you pay to
    consider as well - you can't use cash.

    You have to pay by way of something which is almost certainly
    registered to you.

    Think a bit before replying to that one.
    No, well... that's your perogative. It doesn't mean you're right
    though.

    FWIW, I don't use the bays concerned... I have no real self interest
    at present in what is happening in Westminster, I have a real interest
    in the precedent that is being set.
    Which are in your opinion?

    In mine, the council are quids in and have more of an idea of who it
    is, is wandering their streets - people who happen to rely on a bike
    to get around are out of pocket... never mind the extra they're paying
    in fuel duty of late.
     
    jackhackettuk, Sep 29, 2008
    #17
  18. Julian Bond

    Andrew998 Guest

    I spend lots of time in Central London. I think anything that can be done to
    discourage cars and bikes into the centre is a good thing. I wouldn't dream
    of taking my bike in and prefer to use the train.
    I don't understand what the problem is with councils generating money. Any
    money they make on parking charges is money that local residents
    don't have to pay,
    As I said, I don't see a problem with councils generating money from
    parking. The logic is no different than that for chargingh cars.
    Indeed. We are simply agreeing to disagree.
    I agree with you on that point. I'm completely against the new system of
    paying.
    As stated above. I have no problem with councils profiting from parking. If
    you accept cars should pay it is hard to argue that other forms of transport
    shouldn't.
    By the "council" being "quids in" you mean the local residents. The money
    reduces their liability. The fuel duty issue is unrelated and has nothing
    to do with the council. Nobody wants to have to pay more but not charging
    bikes for parking means the council will charge local residents more council
    tax.
     
    Andrew998, Sep 29, 2008
    #18
  19. Julian Bond

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    Maybe I should have read a bit further before posting my reply.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Sep 29, 2008
    #19
  20. Julian Bond

    Andy Bonwick Guest

    If I want to go into London I use the train and the same can be said
    about most major cities.
    I'd imagine that the residents of Westminster would sooner that the
    council raised cash for bike parking bays by charging for their use
    rather than making the residents pay for them via their council tax
    bills. I know that's the view I'd be taking if I lived there.
     
    Andy Bonwick, Sep 29, 2008
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.