Road Pricing

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Sean Hamerton, Feb 11, 2007.

  1. Sean Hamerton

    Pip Luscher Guest

    Well, this would also mean a change to their attitudes to
    accomodation, as in "don't buy". Or the process of moving from bought
    home to bought home would have to be made a whole lot cheaper and
    simpler.
    Not always possible, though. Round here there are railway stations, in
    fact, I live within about 3/4 mile of one that's a couple of stops
    from Cambridge, but my old place of work was five miles the other side
    of the city and apart from a probable bus service to the nearest
    village, there is no public transport whatsoever.

    It would be lovely to be able to pick a job within 5-10 miles of home,
    but quite frankly, unless I want to stack shelves in Tesco, that ain't
    going to happen. I could move closer to Cambridge, and pay for the
    privilege with a colossal mortgage and be forever worrying about
    interest rates. The trouble is, if everyone did this, this would
    ultimately lead to yet more urban sprawl. The alternative is for
    employers to scatter themselves around the country more.

    Very true, but you could argue that we as a society are moving beyond
    seeing personal transport as a perk. Perhaps we need to sit down and
    think about where we really want to be as a society.
    My personal feeling is that the fundamental problem with overcrowded
    roads, and other modern issues, is overpopulation, pure and simple.
    I'll admit that this is *slightly* hypocritical of me, seeing as
    Herself is up the duff. I console myself with the fact that I'm in a
    reasonable position to limit her procreative urges.
    Sorry, you're beyond that.
     
    Pip Luscher, Feb 13, 2007
    #81
    1. Advertisements

  2. Sean Hamerton

    ogden Guest

    Eliminate the majority of commuting to a regular place of work and the
    remaining customer-site traffic shouldn't be too much of an issue, I'd
    have thought. Just look at the drop in congestion during the school
    holidays, when there's no school run, and imagine that that'd be like if
    it applied to workers as well.
     
    ogden, Feb 13, 2007
    #82
    1. Advertisements

  3. Sean Hamerton

    Switters Guest

    That's a bit harsh, ogden can't be *that* bad.
     
    Switters, Feb 13, 2007
    #83
  4. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    Well TBF I'd have an exclusion zone around schools for parental vehicles at
    drop/collection times. A proper school bus system is needed, even the Yanks
    manage that.
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    #84
  5. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ
    No central tracking = no appeal against the bill you're sent.

    Equally unacceptable.


    --
    Wicked Uncle Nigel - Podium Placed Ducati Race Engineer as featured in
    Performance Bikes and Fast Bikes

    WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
    SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
    Honda GL1000K2 (Falling apart) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
    Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Yamaha Vmax Honda ST1100 wiv trailer
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Feb 13, 2007
    #85
  6. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    Has anyone else looked at regs for electric bicycles? they are bad and
    about to get worse. Some EU fucker has now decided the pedals have to be
    turning to keep the motor engaged. Max power 250watts, fine for Holland,
    useless in England.

    Decent hub drives are 500w. Having seen Tallblokes leccy bike they are a
    feckin good idea for urban dwellers.

    It's like they want to drive people into their cars.
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    #86
  7. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    I understood she was the Saving Grace
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    #87
  8. Sean Hamerton

    Ace Guest

    The real problem with this, and any of the 'pay to drive' options
    under discussion, is that they don't attempt to promote and feasible
    alternative to driving. Unless or until that is done I don't think any
    amount of additional expense for drivers will significantly reduce
    peak-time congestion. One logical conclusion to this approach is that
    it would simply serve to drive salaries up to cope with commuters'
    extra travelling costs.

    --
    _______
    ..'_/_|_\_'. Ace (brucedotrogers a.t rochedotcom)
    \`\ | /`/ GSX-R1000K3 (slightly broken, currently missing)
    `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
    `\|/`
    `
     
    Ace, Feb 13, 2007
    #88
  9. Sean Hamerton

    TOG Guest


    Yes, agreed there is a road space issue. However, don't you think that
    making one road cheap and hiking the price of another will merely
    shift traffic to the cheaper road? And f there's a time factor as
    well, then people will simply pressure their employers to let them
    work hours that suit the cheap road price times, because this is what
    people *do*.

    Note that in France, where most motorways are toll roads, there is a
    definite increase of traffic on main roads that go in the same
    direction. As you'll know, the main road south from Calais is a
    classic example.

    Pricing roads according to time will only make that situation worse, I
    think.
     
    TOG, Feb 13, 2007
    #89
  10. Sean Hamerton

    Dan White Guest

    <Applause>
     
    Dan White, Feb 13, 2007
    #90
  11. Sean Hamerton

    TOG Guest

    But low congestion locations won't *be* low congestion locations if
    everyone moves to them...

    It's like saying: "It would be more popular if it wasn't so busy."
    It's self-defeating.
    Actually, it might. It would mean a seismic change in the way people
    live and work. Think of schooltimes, for example. But the point I'm
    making is that if you use tax to make one road cheaper than another,
    because it's less congested, people will flock to the cheaper option.
    And then it will become congested.

    I strongly agree with you that spy monitoring is not the way to do it,
    mind.
     
    TOG, Feb 13, 2007
    #91
  12. Sean Hamerton

    Dan White Guest

    You forget what's happened with the congestion charge... it seems to have
    become (if it wasn't in the first place) a method to extract money from
    people first and a method of reducing congestion second. Hence the price
    increases and the expansion of the area.

    If overall revenue from road pricing starts to fall due to people changing
    their driving times, do you seriously believe that prices *won't* go up/get
    shifted to other times, regardless of the congestion level at those times?
     
    Dan White, Feb 13, 2007
    #92
  13. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ
    Well, let's examine the one case of road pricing that already exists:
    the so-called 'Congestion Charge'. That uses ANPR cameras, as we know.

    So why are the cameras left on outside of the CC charging hours?

    Oh look, one example, one case where the technology has already been
    used to track vehicle movements. Quelle surprise.

    You know as well as I do that they won't be able to resist; they've
    already proven it.

    --
    Wicked Uncle Nigel - Podium Placed Ducati Race Engineer as featured in
    Performance Bikes and Fast Bikes

    WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
    SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
    Honda GL1000K2 (Falling apart) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
    Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Yamaha Vmax Honda ST1100 wiv trailer
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Feb 13, 2007
    #93
  14. Sean Hamerton

    CT Guest

    The War On Terrorism, of course!
    Also, the CC was succesful. So successful in fact, that they had to
    increase the charge by 60% and expand the area greatly to ensure they
    received the required amount of revenue.

    Whilst a country-wide road pricing scheme can't be exanded, they will
    surely up the charges if it actually reduces traffic levels to lower
    than they anticipated and therefore have an unexpected drop in revenue.
     
    CT, Feb 13, 2007
    #94
  15. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    Shirly half the point is that none of these schemes are anything other than
    tax raisers? all this current green hype from Brown is nothing more than a
    fix for his tax take shortfall.
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    #95
  16. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Champ
    True, but it uses an extremely crude technique. I think we can agree
    that toll-booths aren't suitable for a country-wide system, yes?

    Permit me to re-phrase slightly; "let's examine the one case of
    wide-area road pricing..."

    --
    Wicked Uncle Nigel - Podium Placed Ducati Race Engineer as featured in
    Performance Bikes and Fast Bikes

    WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
    SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
    Honda GL1000K2 (Falling apart) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
    Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Yamaha Vmax Honda ST1100 wiv trailer
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Feb 13, 2007
    #96
  17. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    But they have already declared ANPR vehicle tracking as an overt goal and
    it's on trial in Scotland. No ifs or buts.
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    #97
  18. Sean Hamerton

    Dan White Guest

    Shhhhhh, you'll upset Champ...
     
    Dan White, Feb 13, 2007
    #98
  19. Sean Hamerton

    ginge Guest

    They were saying that 3 years ago in Leeds, but it never happened.
     
    ginge, Feb 13, 2007
    #99
  20. Sean Hamerton

    Hog Guest

    It has up there now and is being deployed country wide
     
    Hog, Feb 13, 2007
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.