Road clearing solution

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Switters, Jan 8, 2010.

  1. Switters

    Switters Guest

    Why don't they fit the refuse collection lorries with snow ploughs and
    grit spreaders? Then they can make their way through all the streets,
    including the side roads, clearing and gritting them as they collect the
    piles of amassing rubbish.
     
    Switters, Jan 8, 2010
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Switters

    Donnie Guest

    Switters said:
    because that would be too expensive, ie the amount of extra grit would
    dramatically increase.

    Anyway, its quite simple, you can either get to the main road or you
    can't.

    If you're worried about driving in the conditions, then don't, simple.
     
    Donnie, Jan 8, 2010
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Switters

    TOG@Toil Guest

    Because to carry enough grit, they wouldn't have the space or weight
    capacity to carry any rubbish, YTC.
     
    TOG@Toil, Jan 8, 2010
    #3
  4. Switters

    petrolcan Guest

    Where would they fit a grit contraption on a refuse lorry?
     
    petrolcan, Jan 8, 2010
    #4
  5. Why not fit a shredder and spread the already collected refuse as grippy
    compound?
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Jan 8, 2010
    #5
  6. Switters

    Krusty Guest

    They fit snowploughs to them in New York.
     
    Krusty, Jan 8, 2010
    #6
  7. Switters

    YTC#1 Guest

    cost.

    Next ?
     
    YTC#1, Jan 8, 2010
    #7
  8. Switters

    YTC#1 Guest


    Did you work out who should pay for it ?
     
    YTC#1, Jan 8, 2010
    #8
  9. Switters

    Switters Guest

    The grit is spread as the rubbish is collected. One could offset the
    other. Yes I know one is denser than the other and wouldn't be spread by
    the same volume, but these are mere details. I'll leave those to someone
    else.
     
    Switters, Jan 8, 2010
    #9
  10. Switters

    Adrian Guest

    So are you suggesting a vehicle with twice the chassis length, to carry
    two separate bodies? (And, of course, an increased payload to cope with
    the weight of the two bodies)

    Or were you thinking that the grit and rubbish could just mingle freely
    in the one vehicle body? That'd be nice - the wagon heads up your road,
    flinging a mix of grit and shitty nappies around.

    Have you also considered the subtle detail that grit is spread from the
    rear of gritters, which is also where the bin men tend to load the
    rubbish from?
     
    Adrian, Jan 8, 2010
    #10
  11. Switters

    Switters Guest

    The costs saved by not needing so many dedicated ploughs, perhaps.
     
    Switters, Jan 8, 2010
    #11
  12. Switters

    Pete Fisher Guest

    In communiqué <>, Grimly
    Not a bad idea in the old days of ash and cinders from open fires.
    Modern refuse collection vehicles are mostly not simple boxes that you
    throw rubbish in these days, with the advent of wheelie bins and
    'packamatic' systems. No way of keeping a reasonable supply of grit.

    A QD snow plough might be an option though, as Krusty said (ignoring the
    cost).

    --
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Pete Fisher at Home: |
    | Voxan Roadster Yamaha WR250Z/Supermoto "Old Gimmer's Hillclimber" |
    | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" |
    +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
     
    Pete Fisher, Jan 8, 2010
    #12
  13. Switters

    TMack Guest

     
    TMack, Jan 8, 2010
    #13
  14. Switters

    Switters Guest

    Good grief no, that would be ridiculous.
    Now you're being silly.

    Let's see.... a single compartment, with a floating separator. Grit at
    the bottom to reduce CoG. As the grit is spread the separator lowers
    making room for more compacted refuse.
    Vehicle stops, gritting stops. Men don't get sprayed. Or they can have
    some kevlar trousers, or something.

    Again, mere details.
     
    Switters, Jan 8, 2010
    #14
  15. Switters

    fishman Guest

    Might melt the snow/ice but then it just re-freezes. At least the salt/
    grit prevents this to some extent.
     
    fishman, Jan 8, 2010
    #15
  16. Switters

    Rudy Lacchin Guest

    Cracking plan, Grommit! Perhaps they could deliver the milk and papers at
    the same time. And the mail. And pick up paying passengers, assuming the
    buses aren't running, then they'd pay for themselves. Maybe you could fit
    them with wind turbines as well...

    Have you suggested this to Gordon Brown yet?
     
    Rudy Lacchin, Jan 8, 2010
    #16
  17. Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, R C Nesbit
    Really? It prevents water from the edge of the treated area from running
    back on and re-freezing?

    Remarkable.
     
    Wicked Uncle Nigel, Jan 8, 2010
    #17
  18. Switters

    Donnie Guest

    Rudy Lacchin said:
    Dont be stupid man!
    You'd never get more than one turbine on there so it would be
    uneconomic, whereas you'd get 2 on every bus in the country!
    :)
     
    Donnie, Jan 9, 2010
    #18
  19. Switters

    Beav Guest

    I suspect that might be a tad on the slow, potentially dangerous to passers
    by, expensive and really impractical side of things.


    --
    Beav

    VN 750
    Zed 1000
    OMF# 19
     
    Beav, Jan 10, 2010
    #19
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.