"Rambling/Ranting" about front tire woes

Discussion in 'Texas Bikers' started by Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006.

  1. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    Well, I'm sitting here listening to my little pocket radio,
    feeling down about my recent front tire disaster.

    Trying to adjust to the time change, I'd think it would
    be easier to sleep later, rather than harder.

    But, my tire dilemma began on 3/16 with the replace-
    ment of a off-season, heavily worn Dunlop D206F 150/80/17, with a Dunlop
    Elite III of equal size.

    Life was good, as with all new tire experiences, the ride
    and handling had been restored, and my faith in mankind
    had been renewed. <g> Additionally, I'd recently wash-
    the bike thoroughly, after the installer's comment - "hey,
    do you know what a car wash is? <disgusted sigh>".

    Then, 191.7 miles later, before 3/31, I had to roll the
    scooter out of the garage to retrieve the charcoal grille
    for my wife's dinner plan.

    Glancing down with admiration at my newly acquired
    tire, I was almost shocked into a cardiac arrest. There
    it was, a machine screw firmly embedded in the tread
    section of the new tire, about 1" offset from center-point.

    I thought I was gonna' require defibrillation. I had to sit
    down to collect myself. After a mild recovery, I returned
    to inspect the damage. Yep, it appears a sheet metal
    screw, firmly embedded in the tire, with a rather shiny
    bright head, as if it's smiling, just to taunt me. The install
    facility, Renegade Cycles in Mesquite, suggested that
    the damaged tire could be tube(d), which I appreciated.

    But, after some consideration, I don't see that as a viable
    alternative. For one reason, should I repeat this experien-
    ce once again, and pick up another road object, I'll be
    sitting somewhere on the side of the road, with a tube(d)
    tire without any air. That is, if I'm lucky enough to survive
    a sudden front wheel deflation. At least now, for the time being, I can
    still seem to ride the bike, including the for-eign object, back to the
    shop. I guess there's the patch,
    or "boot" option, but I've had no experience(s) with that.

    Although I seldom exceed 60 mph. I'd rather not have to assess this tire's
    history if I were to venture up to the subsonic speeds of the nearby
    toll-way(s).

    Not that I haven't had somewhat similar occurrences in
    the past. My last rear tire replacement was accelerated
    due to a road object's damage. But, that was certainly well into the sunset
    phase of that tire's life. But now, <200
    miles, that's just "cruel, and unusual punishment".

    So, I'm off today to again replace the tire with another
    that I pray will provide a much longer duration.

    Thanks, for being the audience to my rant.

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Gary Walker

    louie Guest

    Being a new tire, maybe the screw isn't all the way through. Un-screw it and
    listen for air.
    If it isn't leaking after removal of the screw, I would not worry about it.
    If it was leaking, given the location of the screw, I'd plug it and not
    worry about it.

    ....louie
     
    louie, Apr 4, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Gary Walker

    BJayKana Guest

    (Gary Walker)
    Well, I'm sitting here listening to my little pocket radio, feeling down
    about my recent front tire disaster.
    ~Glancing down with admiration at my newly acquired tire, I was almost
    shocked into a cardiac arrest. There it was, a machine screw firmly
    embedded in the tread section of the new tire, about 1" offset from
    center-point.
    ~I thought I was gonna' require defibrillation. I had to sit down to
    collect myself. After a mild recovery, I returned to inspect the damage.
    Yep, it appears a sheet metal screw, firmly embedded in the tire, with a
    rather shiny bright head, as if it's smiling, just to taunt me. The
    install facility, Renegade Cycles in Mesquite, suggested that the
    damaged tire could be tube(d), which I appreciated.
    ~But, after some consideration, I don't see that as a viable
    alternative. For one reason, should I repeat this experien- ce once
    again, and pick up another road object, I'll be sitting somewhere on the
    side of the road, with a tube(d) tire without any air. That is, if I'm
    lucky enough to survive a sudden front wheel deflation. At least now,
    for the time being, ~I can still seem to ride the bike, including the
    for-eign object, back to the shop. I guess there's the patch,
    or "boot" option, but I've had no experience(s) with that.
    ~Although I seldom exceed 60 mph. I'd rather not have to assess this
    tire's history if I were to venture up to the subsonic speeds of the
    nearby toll-way(s).
    ~Not that I haven't had somewhat similar occurrences in the past. My
    last rear tire replacement was accelerated due to a road object's
    damage. But, that was certainly well into the sunset phase of that
    tire's life. But now, <200 miles, that's just "cruel, and unusual
    punishment".
    ~So, I'm off today to again replace the tire with another that I pray
    will provide a much longer duration.
    ~Thanks, for being the audience to my rant.
    Gary):~(

    while grinning, wrote:
    ~Gary, inspite of reading about your bad luck, I found your piece to be
    delighfully well written and very entertaining. I intend to send it to
    my Son'n'law KB. He'll get a laugh out of it.
    NOW: your ordeal. I am just afraid to have a tire , that has had a hole
    in it. no matter what, I know I'd have to get another'n. Now: On a 4
    wheeled vehicle, it is not so bad to reapair 'em, boot 'em. plug 'em.
    But riding along on a bike, I would have a mental problem, of
    constantly thinking about the dang thang. It wood'nt be wurth it, to me.
    Thanks, and your're welcome. heh heh-bjay-
     
    BJayKana, Apr 4, 2006
    #3
  4. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    Yes, those are options. And once I've returned to the
    shop, when we remove the screw, we'll know more.

    But, like the patch, I'd probably not ride on a repaired
    front tire though. But, many riders do....

    Thanks,

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #4
  5. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    (Gary Walker)
    Well, I'm sitting here listening to my little pocket radio, feeling down
    about my recent front tire disaster.
    ~Glancing down with admiration at my newly acquired tire, I was almost
    shocked into a cardiac arrest. There it was, a machine screw firmly
    embedded in the tread section of the new tire, about 1" offset from
    center-point.
    ~I thought I was gonna' require defibrillation. I had to sit down to
    collect myself. After a mild recovery, I returned to inspect the damage.
    Yep, it appears a sheet metal screw, firmly embedded in the tire, with a
    rather shiny bright head, as if it's smiling, just to taunt me. The
    install facility, Renegade Cycles in Mesquite, suggested that the
    damaged tire could be tube(d), which I appreciated.
    ~But, after some consideration, I don't see that as a viable
    alternative. For one reason, should I repeat this experien- ce once
    again, and pick up another road object, I'll be sitting somewhere on the
    side of the road, with a tube(d) tire without any air. That is, if I'm
    lucky enough to survive a sudden front wheel deflation. At least now,
    for the time being, ~I can still seem to ride the bike, including the
    for-eign object, back to the shop. I guess there's the patch,
    or "boot" option, but I've had no experience(s) with that.
    ~Although I seldom exceed 60 mph. I'd rather not have to assess this
    tire's history if I were to venture up to the subsonic speeds of the
    nearby toll-way(s).
    ~Not that I haven't had somewhat similar occurrences in the past. My
    last rear tire replacement was accelerated due to a road object's
    damage. But, that was certainly well into the sunset phase of that
    tire's life. But now, <200 miles, that's just "cruel, and unusual
    punishment".
    ~So, I'm off today to again replace the tire with another that I pray
    will provide a much longer duration.
    ~Thanks, for being the audience to my rant.
    Gary):~(

    while grinning, wrote:
    ~Gary, inspite of reading about your bad luck, I found your piece to be
    delighfully well written and very entertaining. I intend to send it to
    my Son'n'law KB. He'll get a laugh out of it.
    NOW: your ordeal. I am just afraid to have a tire , that has had a hole
    in it. no matter what, I know I'd have to get another'n. Now: On a 4
    wheeled vehicle, it is not so bad to reapair 'em, boot 'em. plug 'em.
    But riding along on a bike, I would have a mental problem, of
    constantly thinking about the dang thang. It wood'nt be wurth it, to me.
    Thanks, and your're welcome. heh heh-bjay-


    Thanks BJ.... Unfortunately, I have the same concerns.

    I look at it this way. It's painful just to pay for these tires,
    without having to (re)pay for one in only 200 miles. But,
    after the reinstall, it's over. Contrast that with having to
    anguish or worry over the tire's condition for the remain-
    ing life of the tire. I'll choose #1.

    Thanks,

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #5
  6. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    Thanks Jerry. This is a Valkyrie also, but the front tire.

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #6
  7. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    Up until this tire, they were both still Dunlop OEM's
    D206's. However, this latest front tire is the Elite III,
    still Dunlop. I was a little concerned about the change
    when the installer made the recommendation, but I
    reviewed Dunlop's site, only to read that the Elite is
    the upgrade/replacement for the D206.

    Yes, I'm aware of the Valkyrie owners changing out
    to the Metzler's, Avon's, etc. In fact, many of the Valk
    sites have the migration results very well documented.

    As I recall from that reading, the Avon's win out as the
    superior tire for the replacement on the Valk. It seems
    that the Metzler's, although extending the mileage, didn't
    fare quite as well with regard to handling, durability, etc.

    I've learned over the last few years that the biggest factor
    with my tire durability, is my riding style. Namely, just
    because a tire is not squealing doesn't mean it's not
    breaking traction, and depositing mileage on the street.

    So, with that in mind, the additional safety factor, and
    some advanced age thrown in, I adjusted my riding style
    considerably. I would probably think that with my new
    putt-putt style, I'll easily get 14-16K out of the Dunlop's.

    Of course, that's presuming that I can keep the foreign
    objects out of them. <g>

    Thanks,

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #7
  8. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    The first replacement, for the front, with the Elite III,
    cost $212 and change. I don't have the invoice at
    hand at the moment, but that charge was about $155
    for the tire, $45 for the change, and the rest for tax.

    I don't research tire prices relentlessly, as do some,
    but isn't ~$155 pretty close to some online prices?

    Pretty expensive, but not too bad, I've paid more in the
    past, as I recall. That work was done a Renegade
    Cycles in the 75150 area.

    I'm about to post an update on the second replacement,
    take a look!

    Thanks,

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #8
  9. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    Well, that's good to know, but I just don't understand
    how they would gratuitously replace a new tire when
    I'm the one that piloted it on top of a machine screw.

    Not disagreeing, I just find that pretty phenomenal.

    Thanks,

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #9
  10. Gary Walker

    BJayKana Guest

    (Gary Walker) wrote:
    (thinks it over and says:)
    I look at it this way. It's painful just to pay for these tires, without
    having to (re)pay for one in only 200 miles. But, after the reinstall,
    it's over. Contrast that with having to anguish or worry over the tire's
    condition for the remain- ing life of the tire. I'll choose #1.
    Thanks,
    Gary

    wrote:~)
    Think of it this way. You could have rode off on a sizeble trip, and
    along the way it go down on ya. and strand ya', or wurse, get too low,
    while hurrying around a nice curve, and get ya' hurt! heh heh-bjay-
     
    BJayKana, Apr 4, 2006
    #10
  11. Gary Walker

    Gary Walker Guest

    (Gary Walker) wrote:
    (thinks it over and says:)
    I look at it this way. It's painful just to pay for these tires, without
    having to (re)pay for one in only 200 miles. But, after the reinstall,
    it's over. Contrast that with having to anguish or worry over the tire's
    condition for the remain- ing life of the tire. I'll choose #1.
    Thanks,
    Gary

    wrote:~)
    Think of it this way. You could have rode off on a sizeble trip, and
    along the way it go down on ya. and strand ya', or wurse, get too low,
    while hurrying around a nice curve, and get ya' hurt! heh heh-bjay-


    Yes, those are certainly possibilities. As I learned while
    at the shop today, BS'ing with others, just about every-
    one has a favorite tire story, or two.

    Gary
     
    Gary Walker, Apr 4, 2006
    #11
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.