Radial mounted front calipers?

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by CrazyCam, Sep 27, 2008.

  1. CrazyCam

    CrazyCam Guest

    Hi folks.

    I notice that it seems very fashionable at the moment, for bike makers
    to use radially mounted front brake calipers.

    Is there some good reason for it, and, if so, what is it?

    regards,
    CrazyCam
     
    CrazyCam, Sep 27, 2008
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. CrazyCam

    Knobdoodle Guest

    I believe that the theory is that conventional mounting distorts the forks
    slightly under extreme brake-loads thus interfering with bump travel.
    I doubt mere mortals like us would ever notice though.
    Clem
     
    Knobdoodle, Sep 27, 2008
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. CrazyCam

    Diogenes Guest

    Please excuse my consderable ignorance, but what does "radially
    mounted" mean? And this is a family forum, thank you very much!!!
    Onya bike...

    Gerry
     
    Diogenes, Sep 27, 2008
    #3
  4. CrazyCam

    Diogenes Guest

    Diogenes, Sep 27, 2008
    #4
  5. CrazyCam

    Nev.. Guest

    I think it has more to do with the end of the caliper which is anchored
    to the fork having more braking force than the end which is trailing.
    This effect is particularly noticeable on the front left caliper of a
    blackbird (which pivots somewhat to activate the linked piston on the
    rear caliper. The brake pad in the front left will wear much more
    unevenly from end to end than the front right or the rear.

    Nev..
    '07 XB12X
     
    Nev.., Sep 27, 2008
    #5
  6. CrazyCam

    Nev.. Guest

    From memory, at the same time they changed to radial mounted calipers
    (I think it was on the ZX10R), they 'downgraded' from 6 piston to 4
    piston calipers because they reckoned the improvement in braking with
    radial mounting was so great that an improvement in braking could still
    be achieved while a further weight saving was realised. Discuss.

    Nev..
    '07 XB12X
     
    Nev.., Sep 27, 2008
    #6
  7. And not only that - it's a vile misnomer; a set of radial anything needs
    to converge to a common centre point. As the mounting bolts on a
    radial-mount caliper are parallel to each other, they don't qualify.
    They should call them parallel-mount, or something, referrring to the
    orientation of the caliper mounting bolt relative to the plane of the
    brake disc... under that convention, normal calipers would be
    transverse-, perpendicular- or orthogonal-mounted... or just
    regular-mounted.
    Thoroughly true, and very rarely acknowledged.

    *yoinck* Ah, the advantages of living like a slob. Reach down from the
    couch to the floor, retrieve December 2006 issue of "Performance Bikes"
    featuring a large pic of Carl Fogarty next to his 1998 WSB title-winning
    996. The regular-mount caliper mounting arm on the Ohlins fork, cast
    integral with the magnesium fork bottom (now there's a component
    drastically in need of a rename[1]) and milled out for lightness,
    features two sets of caliper mounting bolt holes, spaced what look to be
    ~20mm apart.

    The following year, factory Ducatis (and GP bikes running Ohlins) got
    parallel-mount calipers for the first time.
    Some of that'll be attributable to Chinese whispers... the first bits of
    gumpf about parallel-mount calipers acknowledge that the benefits are in
    the greater stiffness of the mounting of the caliper to the fork...
    because the caliper is fixed at both the leading and the trailing end
    (with respect to disc rotation - and, note, there's no reason why this
    can't be done with regular mounting), rather than just the trailing end,
    if the disc flexes from side to side, it doesn't take the caliper with
    it, and because there are now two shorter, spaced-out mounting arms
    instead of a single longer one, there'll be less azimuthal movement of
    the caliper... get on the picks, the disc tries to take the caliper with
    it, caliper mounting arm doesn't let it, there's less flexion with the
    parallel-mount arrangement.

    The mounting can be made more compact, lighter etc... the difference in
    performance might be SFA, but it makes for inherently better
    engineering, like mounting the calipers behind the forkleg instead of in
    front, or stacking the gearbox shafts on top of one another, so why not
    do it?



    [1] If you're Caucausian, and you let one go in the company of some
    Native American, then lie about it, would they be correct in stating
    that white man speaks with fork bottom?
     
    IK Laboratories, Sep 27, 2008
    #7
  8. CrazyCam

    Knobdoodle Guest

    Yeah but EVERYBODY downgraded from 6 piston callipers; radially mounted or
    not.
    I think that's more of an indication that the 6 piston callipers were a
    fashion item (that went out of fashion) than "increased braking
    performance".
     
    Knobdoodle, Sep 27, 2008
    #8
  9. CrazyCam

    Knobdoodle Guest

    These are the types of questions that NEED to be asked!!
     
    Knobdoodle, Sep 27, 2008
    #9
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.