Quiet helmets

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Matt Horn, May 5, 2005.

  1. Matt Horn

    Lozzo Guest

    Bear says...
    If I were the salesman I'd tell you it's your tough luck, buy some
    earplugs. There's no promise it'll be quiet, there's a promise that
    it's been tested to ensure safety standards are met. As long as the
    helmet is manufactured correctly and it meets the standards, then it's
    your's for good.

    I'd never accept a helmet back under those circumstances, and I
    wouldn't take one back if someone was claiming a blatant self-inflicted
    fault with one after they'd taken it up the road for a noise test
    either.

    Most shops are wise to these litle tricks now.
     
    Lozzo, May 5, 2005
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. Matt Horn

    Lozzo Guest

    steve auvache says...
    Just about every bike shop I know has a sign in there somewhere that
    says helmets will only be accepted as returns if there is a
    manufacturer's fault with them. Sizing issues, colour issues and noise
    issues are not good enough reasons to return a helmet.
    I don't see how you can compare the two.

    A helmet can have significant structural damage without showing any
    sign of it on the outside of the shell. A drop onto carpet covered
    concrete can weaken a shell significantly.

    Brakes are designed to be used hard time and time again.

    What are you trying to say?
    Hygiene is a factor as well, but the main one is safety.
     
    Lozzo, May 5, 2005
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. Matt Horn

    BGN Guest

    And if a bike dealer said that I could use the helmet for an hour then
    return it if I didn't like it I probably wouldn't buy from them.
    Heaven knows what could have happened to that helmet when loaned out.
     
    BGN, May 5, 2005
    #43
  4. Lozzo wrote
    I know this. I am not at all happy with it.
    I am trying to say that suggesting a helmet might be abused while on a
    test ride is more bollox than saying a bike won't be and that there are
    better arguments you could use to keep the purchaser away from his
    rights to satisfy himself that the product would be suitable.
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #44
  5. BGN wrote
    This is where anecdote comes in so handy dunnit? "I bought my lid
    because my mate said his mate at work knew a bloke whose brother bought
    one the same colour 15 years ago and he said it was good."
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #45
  6. Matt Horn

    Lozzo Guest

    steve auvache says...
    Why not? You don't think that a safety issue is a good enough reason,
    or that the others I mention are good enough.

    The primary concern is safety, because you are buying a safety related
    item. Bad hygiene can be overcome by giving the liner a spray with any
    number of products designed to kill bacteria etc.

    If you go to buy a helmet and the thing doesn't fit when you get it
    home, or it is the wrong colour, then tough fucking luck. You aint
    bringing it back to any shop I might run.
    Suitable for what? It's suitable as a safety item which means it is
    suitable for the purpose for which it is being sold, whether or not it
    is noisy is not a safety issue as far as I am concerned.
     
    Lozzo, May 5, 2005
    #46
  7. Matt Horn

    BGN Guest

    Testing helmets sound like a very expensive public liability insurance
    business.

    Imagine if someone came off of their machine while using a helmet that
    had been in the sun for about 60 hours on various tests by sixty
    different peepses. They hurt themselves and then sue the helmet
    shoppe for providing a helmet that had been dropped/bumped/abused
    before by heaven knows how many people. It would be difficult to
    proove that the helmet wasn't damaged before they put it on, and the
    shop owner wouldn't really be able to say otherwise.

    How much does a significant head injury cost on public liability in
    the UK these days?

    You've got a valid point about bikes on test rides, but the brakes are
    designed to be whacked quite often.
     
    BGN, May 5, 2005
    #47
  8. Matt Horn

    Lozzo Guest

    Bear says...
     
    Lozzo, May 5, 2005
    #48
  9. Matt Horn

    dwb Guest

    As Bear said though, if the customer _specifically_ asked for a quiet lid,
    and it wasn't (and the shop knew this) then they should have some rights to
    a refund/return.
     
    dwb, May 5, 2005
    #49
  10. Matt Horn

    dwb Guest

    I was given a test ride on a VFR with a plugged (and badly worn) rear tyre
    that was mismatched to the front. The bike slid rather nastily on the first
    corner I came to - luckily I didnt' bin it - but never assume the bike's in
    decent nick.
     
    dwb, May 5, 2005
    #50
  11. Matt Horn

    dwb Guest

    If you've got an S1, not you.

    If you've got a concept - well, Bear put it quite well with the Lego
    spaceman look.
     
    dwb, May 5, 2005
    #51
  12. Matt Horn

    Lozzo Guest

    dwb says...
    No decent salesman would claim any helmet was quiet. It's all relative,
    what I'd consider quiet might be too loud for someone else. We all have
    different opinions on things like that.
     
    Lozzo, May 5, 2005
    #52
  13. Matt Horn

    Tosspot Guest

    You ride on the right? Anyway, ok, that would be a problem.
     
    Tosspot, May 5, 2005
    #53
  14. Even if he didn't, wouldn't you look left before pulling from Lane 3 to
    Lane 2 or 1 on the motorway?


    --
    Dnc

    B1200 - +30bhp ~|~ VS800 - borked
    TS150 - squatting ~|~ V2300 - flat cap and rug

    MIB#26 two#54(soiled) UKRMMA#26 BOTAFOT#153 X-FOT#003
     
    Doesnotcompute, May 5, 2005
    #54
  15. you would need a definition of what is noisy and what isn't as far as
    helmets go
    no two helmets or the heads that go into them are the same nor is the
    riders riding position so the noise levels within the helmet will vary
    dramatically from person to person
     
    steve robinson, May 5, 2005
    #55
  16. Lozzo wrote
    Because I *cannot* test a helmet, which I am obliged by law to have one
    of, for a thing as simple as rider comfort in the environment in which
    it is to be used.

    Simple as that.

    Add all sorts of supporting shit like comfort = safety and all the rest
    of it if you will but I would prefer to keep my complaint simple.

    I appreciate that resolving my complaint is not without it's issues and
    problems but these are not going to be solved by those in the trade whom
    I know who are effectively saying **** off, buy it or not, see if we
    care and no refunds.
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #56
  17. steve robinson wrote
    It is reasonable to assume this but who said it was so in the first
    place and are they right?
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #57
  18. Matt Horn

    Eiron Guest

    There should be an EU standard noise test for helmets.
    It can't be too difficult to devise a consistent test with
    two microphones and a dummy head in a wind tunnel.
     
    Eiron, May 5, 2005
    #58
  19. BGN wrote
    They already do put their helmets through tests to get the little
    sticker on the side. Of course there is a big difference between them
    having to because it is the law and us preferring that they did it
    because it might be more comfortable.


    Yet you will happily take a bike out that you know has been trough
    worse?

    Undoubtedly. No argument. Portable ultrasound scanner and a few k of
    disk space anyone?
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #59
  20. Eiron wrote
    Difficult?

    Start the list

    Styling: Faired, unfaired, half faired, double bubble, cheater or
    screen,

    Riding position: touring, sports, cruiser, racing,
     
    steve auvache, May 5, 2005
    #60
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.