Political naivety

You didn't get NT3.51. or 4? Newbie.

 

Please quote a source for this.

 

<note to self - read down thread first>

 

Supposedly eight, but they'd all have to happen at the same time, and
quite frankly there are easier ways....

 

You are a bit obsessed about this.

Could yuo explain why this couldn't happen in the UK now?

 

Mildly homophobic ("serious psychological consequences"!) as well as
racist. Another tick in the box.

 

riccip wrote

More fucking bollox from our latest resident know nothing.


The gas is called ethylene[sp?] and is given off by every single
ripening fruit on the planet without exception. A perfectly natural
process which is halted by keeping the fruits in a nitrogen environment
like Bananas in the holds of non EU boats and then started again by
giving them a whiff of ethylene in the warehouse once they reach these
shores.

While you are learning you may also like to know that ethylene is how
they get all those toms on the vines in East Anglian greenhouses to all
ripen at the same time when their natural tendency is to go for a one at
a time strategy. Perfectly legal, absolutely harmless and only stupid
morons buy them.

You are thinking of what the South Africans do to every single piece of
vegetable matter that they export. The odd thing about it is that
despite tales of horror and woe from all sorts of places and interested
parties nobody has actually managed to prove the point that the practice
is in any way detrimental to us. Which is sad but true.

 

Actually here's one, I read about this a while back and was quite
frankly a little bemused by the notion.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1212734,00.html

It may well address teenage pregnancy, but seems to completely overlook
STDs. Bring back those scary iceberg adverts from the 80's I say,
that'll be enough to traumatise a whole new generation.

 

mups wrote

Get yourself an Essex bird mate, better still a Canvey Girl.
Instinctive it is. They don't need telling.

 

Ben Blaney bored us all completely to death with wittery prose along
the lines of:

Heh, I was playing with *nix systems when I first started in IT, so
never needed them.

--
Cab :^) - almost as fast as G.i.n.g.e.
GSX 1400 - 'Tarts Handbag' (tm) Bike, dead 550/4 Rat
UKRMMA#10 (KoTL), IbW#015, Bob#4, POTM#3

P.S. Remove your_head from the cab. ICQ: 83023471

 

Well, firstly, it's not a mandatory thing. Secondly, it's far from
going on the National Curriculum. Thirdly:

"Schoolchildren, particularly girls, who received such training
developed a 'more mature' response to sex. "

and

"Those behind the course stress the scheme does not suggest teenagers
experiment with oral sex. Instead they say A Pause promotes the
message that other forms of physical intimacy are safer than full
intercourse."


.... who could possibly say that was a bad idea.

 

Are they also going to have demonstrations of how to find the
clitoris?

What, you mean having access to sex education with a discussion of
alternatives to full sex is a bad thing? How exactly? Are you aware of
the current STD and pregnancy figures in teenagers?

 

Major Banks will be able to help you.

IIRC that superceeded notes must be returnable to the issuing bank.

Send them here, and I'll find a use for them

JG

 

Not I, plus as a further positive it's also good to know that if bad
girls want to learn how to suck cock at school they may at least leave
being up to a decent standard.

 

I'm getting those: I have never, ever, done anything so complicated
(and I've done Irish grammar and Maxwell's equations).

 

He obviously isn't aware of anything.

 

Ginge wrote

I see the name of Exeter University mentioned. Whereabouts in Europe is
this can someone tell me please?

 

Serious question: are there really still men out there who don't know
this?

 

Lady Nina wrote

I dunno with what is wrong with the good old fashioned up a bit, down a
bit, THERE that was the norm for wimmin of the type I meet^Wmet.

 

mups says...

You went to the wrong school