Photo of New Bridges Sth Coast Raod

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by Will S, Aug 9, 2005.

  1. Will S

    Will S Guest

    Pic from Bald Hill Stanwell Park looking south at the new bridges under
    construction.

    At the moment scheduled to open early next year.


    I guess a good little route to Wollongong from Sydney would be via the
    National Park, follow the whatever fucking name they give it down to near
    Bulli and then head up Bulli Pass, turn right up to Picton Road and turn
    left then a couple of klms hang left and either head dowm Mt Keira or Mt
    Kembla.

    It sure beats the freeway :)


    http://members.ozemail.com.au/~wlsutton/bridge.html
     
    Will S, Aug 9, 2005
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Hmmm, I'm glad the left _some_ curves there, it looks quite similar to
    The Kiama International Raceway...

    big
     
    Iain Chalmers, Aug 9, 2005
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Will S

    Will S Guest


    What really makes me laugh is they are comparing this road to the Great
    Southern Road in Vic ( in the local rag...the Illawarra Mercury ). I have
    not been on the GSR but I know this wont be a patch on it.

    As the the Kiama International Raceway well this one is going to have a hell
    of a lot more Sunday drivers looking at the views and not the road. Wonder
    how long before the first rider down will be ?
     
    Will S, Aug 9, 2005
    #3
  4. Will S

    ck Guest

    That'll be the _rider_ looking at the views and not the
    road......................

    ck
     
    ck, Aug 9, 2005
    #4
  5. Will S

    gco0307 Guest

    Will, I am unsure if you are local but I know that a few of us from that way
    feel that the first rider down will be within 7 days of opening and expect a
    very severe motorcycle accident within 1 - 2 months.

    Rumours also doing the rounds are about cameras being placed on the bridge
    but I have asked some people who should know (ie. within RTA circles) and
    they have not heard of it yet.



    Garry
     
    gco0307, Aug 9, 2005
    #5
  6. Will S

    Will S Guest

    Keiraville and no idea about cameras but there will be no street lights
    \
     
    Will S, Aug 9, 2005
    #6
  7. Will S

    Nev.. Guest

    What's so dangerous about it?

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
     
    Nev.., Aug 9, 2005
    #7
  8. Will S

    Gary Woodman Guest

    Fixed speed cameras.

    Gary (if any)
     
    Gary Woodman, Aug 10, 2005
    #8
  9. Will S

    Graham Guest

    What's so dangerous about it?
    Nobody can tell Nev, the road has been closed for ages and the new section
    hasn't been completed yet. It is supposed to negate the problem of falling
    rocks from the cliff face landing on the road , the road itself sliding into
    the sea and eliminates a couple of corners. Some silly buggers up here are
    wanting to promote this road as a mini GOR. Trouble is , it's only about 5
    km's long !

    Graham
    GSX750F
     
    Graham, Aug 10, 2005
    #9
  10. Will S

    gco0307 Guest

    Nev,

    If you refer to the bridge there should be nothing dangerous about it but
    given that it has sweeping corners built into it there is already discussion
    at some locations where bike riders frequent about how fast these corners
    can be taken.

    Basically, it will be dangerous to the lunatic fringe trying to show their
    masulinity on a public road.

    As for me, I personally do not know why they even bothered putting the
    bridge there in the first place, the road should have been left closed.

    Garry
     
    gco0307, Aug 10, 2005
    #10
  11. Except for the people that live down along there that all of a sudden had a
    hell of a long detour to get to work etc. And there are a few between Bulli
    and the fallen in bit.

    Al
     
    Alan Pennykid, Aug 10, 2005
    #11
  12. Will S

    Nev.. Guest

    so we can expect there to be a very severe motorcycle accident within 1-2
    months on every road with sweeping corners?

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
     
    Nev.., Aug 10, 2005
    #12
  13. Will S

    Will S Guest

    No Nev. In this case we are going to have a lot of drivers going for a
    Sunday drive and then looking at the views and their concentration levels
    will be down and then add some monkey boy wantabees on bikes trying to outdo
    each other then you have a recipe for disaster
     
    Will S, Aug 10, 2005
    #13
  14. Will S

    Nev.. Guest

    and how is that different to any other road? why the predictions of gloom and
    doom?

    Nev..
    '03 ZX12R
     
    Nev.., Aug 11, 2005
    #14
  15. Will S

    gco0307 Guest

    Al,

    Correct, many locals did not like the idea of a detour but there are a
    number of communities that survive on one way in, one way out and that do
    not have the luxury of two very well maintained roads as a detour (F6 from
    Helensburgh and old Princes Hwy). Timewise the difference from Stanwell Park
    to Wollongong was quicker via the F6 than along Lawrence Hargreaves Drive.
    Yes, far more boring but quicker (except in times of extreme fog).

    As an example, look at Pearl Beach, Patonga, Wagstaff etc in the Gosford/Woy
    Woy region.

    I just feel that the cost of the bridge (estimated at upwards of 40 million)
    could have been used in other areas to improve the road quality and safety.

    I am also aware that my opinion is in the minority amongst my bike riding
    mates as they like the road.


    Garry
     
    gco0307, Aug 11, 2005
    #15
  16. Will S

    gco0307 Guest

    Most other roads do not contain or involve a bridge out into the ocean which
    is on a road advertised as a 'scenic drive'.

    The danger is as Will has said. Meandering gawking drivers mixing with Rossi
    wannabe's mixed with bends.


    Garry
     
    gco0307, Aug 11, 2005
    #16
  17. Will S

    GB Guest

    "recipe for disaster"

    http://www.perkigoth.com/home/kermit/stuff/bullshitbingo/

    GB
     
    GB, Aug 11, 2005
    #17
  18. Will S

    IK Guest

    Oh, for ****'s sake!

    The section of road the new bridge replaces was dominated by a blind
    double-apex hairpin, and an over-90-degree turn with low visibility and
    your choice of a downhill, off-camber approach in one direction or a
    kink around an outcrop of oncoming-traffic-obscuring rock in the other.

    Not to mention the steady drizzle of rocks ranging, from what I've
    swerved around, the size of a fist to the size of a helmet.

    A wide-open bridge gets put in to bypass it all, and you're
    predicting_that_will bring out the casualties?

    Aren't you supposed to be tilting at some kind of windmill to improve
    the safety of roads in the Illawarra? Well, the RTA have gone and taken
    the most dangerous 500m of roadway in an 80km radius out of the
    equation, and you're still bitching...
     
    IK, Aug 11, 2005
    #18
  19. Will S

    gco0307 Guest

    IK

    It could be argued that it is incorrect to label that 500m of roadway the
    most dangerous within an 80km radius (depending on the definition used),
    however it was a dangerous piece of road and something had to be done about
    it. Yes, the bridge is an alternative but my preference (as mentioned
    elsewhere) would have been to leave the road closed and spend the money in
    other areas (ie. National Park, local Illawarra Roads other rural roads etc)
    as there were alternative routes available.

    As for dangerous stretches of road, there are some 500 metre stretches on
    Mac Pass that have a higher accident rate and I would hazard to guess that
    the Nasho could also fit into these calculations (as figures contained in
    the report at
    http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/roadsafety/motorcyclesafety/motorcycleinfo/ could
    indicate).

    As for my 'tilting at some kind of windmill to improve safety of roads in
    the Illawarra', well you are part right. The focus of myself and the others
    involved is Macquarie Pass and whether this expands to cover other roads
    only time will tell.

    Personally, I did not like the stretch of LHD that the bridge replaces for
    all the reasons you mention so did not frequent the area much and aside from
    the curiosity value, I do not expect to become a regular on it.

    Time will tell if the predictions are correct and if not (ie. no accidents
    or casualties), I will be glad, however I would suggest that if people can
    crash on straight freeways then they will always find ways to crash.

    Pick away.



    Garry
     
    gco0307, Aug 11, 2005
    #19
  20. Will S

    John Littler Guest

    <Considers the traffic stats>

    Yeah that sounds about right.

    JL
     
    John Littler, Aug 11, 2005
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.