[MEDIA=youtube]nUDIoN-_Hxs[/MEDIA] Women in Art.
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, Lady Nina Cool. But where was the tennis player scratching her arse?
The Rubens or the Beryl Cook version? http://www.lotoflaughs.com/index_file/funny-pics/sexy-fat-tennis-player.jpg
Oh, "art". I admire the work that went into the morphing algorithm more than any of the portrayals thus shown.
Oh I remember that video - was it for Cry? Women with melty faces!! I'm reading something girly and self improving and it's made me cry twice and I'm only on page 76. [1] Synchronicity with one of the things above. [1] I've also laughed and learnt stuff (including some choice Italian history and phrases) so that's OK
Indeed. Still gets to me - but that because it has particular associations with the year it was released. I'm sure everyone knows it but just in case: Slightly unsettling. Perhaps because we are trying to 'read' the emotion of one face, and it transmogrifies before we can. I hadn't realised Berger was a novelist as well as art critic etc. He writes, at least in this work, in a very simple prose style. TBF, I only grabbed a used paperback copy of Amazon because of finding mention of the main character riding a bike. Some good, almost ZATAMM-like references already and more to come I suspect. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pete Fisher at Home: | | Voxan Roadster Gilera Nordwest * 2 Yamaha WR250Z | | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" | +----------------------------------------------------------------+
In communiqué <bites> I suspect the artists who painted the works used will be remembered long after the code writer has gone. Is that a bad thing? -- +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | Pete Fisher at Home: | | Voxan Roadster Gilera Nordwest * 2 Yamaha WR250Z | | Gilera GFR * 2 Moto Morini 2C/375 Morini 350 "Forgotten Error" | +----------------------------------------------------------------+
We still remember the names of Euclid, Newton, Liebnitz, Riemann and Knuth who, I suspect, are the big names behind those calculations.
I was kind of surprised that for so long women with no cheekbones at all were total crumpet. Maybe my tastes are funny. Cubism is sort of funky, but photo-realistic painting scares the pants off me.
Women with cheek bones look better, imo but maybe it was the fashion to have none in the same way it was fashionable to be very white. It's a cliche but I don't know much about art[1] but I know what I like. Why does photo-realistic stuff scare you? Do photographs themselves scare you? [1] The paintings, really. For example, when I go down to Denmark St and see the guitars hanging in the window I think they look gorgeous and the way the light looks on some buildings etc. etc.