OT BBC 'Maths' Quiz

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by David Thompson, Dec 27, 2003.

  1. Full quiz at:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/more_or_less/3258627.stm

    Will somebody please explain the answer number three?

    "A test for an illness is 90% accurate and 10% of the population have
    that illness. If you are tested at random and your test is positive,
    how likely are you to have the illness? "

    Possible answers are 50%, 80% or 90%
     
    David Thompson, Dec 27, 2003
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. David Thompson

    Mike Cook Guest

    A. 90 %

    The 10 % of the population is irrellevant and designed to throw you because
    the question assumes you gave a positive therefore you must be in the 10 %
    of the population. The question then relates to the accuracy of the test.
    **** Me I amazed myself at getting that right[1]

    Mike Cook

    [1] Please dont tell me I'm wrong :)
     
    Mike Cook, Dec 27, 2003
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. David Thompson

    Mike Cook Guest

    <snip wrong answer>

    Shit , Should have checked the webpage first before inserting foot in mouth
    !
     
    Mike Cook, Dec 27, 2003
    #3
  4. David Thompson

    Mike Cook Guest

    The correct answer according to the webpage page is 50%

    Mike Cook
     
    Mike Cook, Dec 27, 2003
    #4
  5. David Thompson

    Mike Cook Guest

    Just emailed the beeb , Im sure the answer is 90% and they have screwed up.

    Mike Cook
     
    Mike Cook, Dec 27, 2003
    #5
  6. David Thompson

    kAnO Guest

    I thought exactly the same... the answer (apparently) is 50%

    Shit, 3 out of 15...
     
    kAnO, Dec 27, 2003
    #6
  7. David Thompson

    Bob123 Guest

    It’s been a long time since I did stats but if you test 100 people for
    the disease 10 of them will have it but the test is only 90% accurate so
    it will tell 1 of the 10 sufferers he’s clear giving 9 positive results.
    In your sample you have 90 non suffers it will tell you that 9 of them
    are ill due to the inaccuracy of the test, so on a test of 100 people 18
    would test positive, 9 from the ill group and 9 from the well group,
    this gives a 50% chance of any positive test being correct.
    HTH


    --
    Bob
    Currently borrowing a black and red Yamaha XJ750 with fuel injection
    Present: Honda XL125RF (FS)
    Past: Honda CG125
    bob at homeurl tomato dot co dot uk
    remove the red fruit if you’d like to email me.
     
    Bob123, Dec 27, 2003
    #7
  8. 9 but then most of it isn't really maths


    --
    Ian
    "reorganising, a wonderful method for creating an illusion of progress"
    znvygb: (ROT13 all of it to mail me)
    The FAQ is here http://www.ukrm.net/faq/index.html
    98 FZS600, 72 T120R MIB#21 TWA#6
     
    Boots Blakeley, Dec 27, 2003
    #8
  9. David Thompson

    Colin Irvine Guest

    <g> See Bob123's answer below. The BBC is right.

    You're not alone - most people find statistics the hardest part of
    maths. Here's a very simple question I once used when someone boasted
    of their ability with statistics.

    You hear two children playing in the garden next door. One of them
    sticks their head over the fence and you see it is a girl. What is the
    probability that the other child is also a girl? No tricks in the
    question, assume boy/girl is 50/50.

    Choose from 3/4, 2/3, 1/2, 1/3.

    Bob123 is not allowed to answer!
     
    Colin Irvine, Dec 27, 2003
    #9
  10. David Thompson

    Colin Irvine Guest

    Which is why I'm not going to try it.
     
    Colin Irvine, Dec 27, 2003
    #10
  11. Very odd - I can't figure how they got their answer.

    Rick
     
    Richard Sterry, Dec 27, 2003
    #11
  12. David Thompson

    Bob123 Guest

    Like what I said

    --
    Bob
    Currently borrowing a black and red Yamaha XJ750 with fuel injection
    Present: Honda XL125RF (FS)
    Past: Honda CG125
    bob at homeurl tomato dot co dot uk
    remove the red fruit if you’d like to email me.
     
    Bob123, Dec 27, 2003
    #12
  13. Agreed. They might just have been able to bamboozle me with some
    mathematical sleight of hand into believing it was 80%, but 50%??

    Rick
     
    Richard Sterry, Dec 27, 2003
    #13
  14. Colin Irvine wrote:


    Another badly worded question. You are ignoring the
    psychology of children. Girls play together.
    One sex may be more curious than the other...

    Now if the question was:
    Assuming 50% each of boys and girls.
    You have two dead babies in a sack and,
    without looking, pull one out....

    1/3.
     
    Old Fart at Play, Dec 27, 2003
    #14
  15. Now I know why I hated statistics 100% of the time. ;-)

    Rick
     
    Richard Sterry, Dec 27, 2003
    #15
  16. David Thompson

    Champ Guest

    Crikey - cheers for that, Ivan. I got 10 out of 15 (tho the test
    really measures ones abilities to make lucky guesses) but I'd never
    have got that one.
     
    Champ, Dec 27, 2003
    #16
  17. David Thompson

    John Heath Guest

    "A test for an illness is 90% accurate and 10% of the population have
    If you want the really mathmatical solution, take a look at
    http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/bayes.html - it's all to do with Bayes'
    theorem - which some people reckon governs the entire universe ! The
    example is nearly identical.

    Read P(A/B) as the Probability of A happening, given that B has happened
    already); and P(~B) as The probability of B not happening.

    Bayes theorem states:
    P(A/B) = P(B/A) x P(B) divided by P(B)

    So
    P(Being ill given that Test is +ve) = P(test is +ve given that you are ill)
    x P(being ill) divide by P(Test is +ve)

    P(Test is +ve given that you are ill) = 0.9
    P(Being ill) =0.1

    P(Test is +ve) = P(Test is +ve and you ARE ill) + P(Test is +ve and you are
    not ill)
    = 0.9x0.1 + 0.1x0.9 =0.09+0.09=0.18

    So answer is 0.9x0.1 divided by 0.18
    =0.5 - ie 50%


    But Dr Ivan's answer is much easier to understand !
     
    John Heath, Dec 27, 2003
    #17
  18. David Thompson

    Bob123 Guest

    I think you’ll find that you’re in the majority there. TBH I never
    studied it except for at the very basic level needed to understand
    Alevel physics, I rather wish I had now as it’s quite fun (compared with
    pure maths) and one of the few mathematical areas that you can get a job
    in fairly easily, massaging pole and so on.

    --
    Bob
    Currently borrowing a black and red Yamaha XJ750 with fuel injection
    Present: Honda XL125RF (FS)
    Past: Honda CG125
    bob at homeurl tomato dot co dot uk
    remove the red fruit if you’d like to email me.
     
    Bob123, Dec 27, 2003
    #18
  19. David Thompson

    Colin Irvine Guest

    <g> I should have offered 1/4 as an option, as that's what most people
    choose. Oh, and you're right of course.
     
    Colin Irvine, Dec 27, 2003
    #19
  20. Colin Irvine wrote:


    A lot of practice. :)
     
    Old Fart at Play, Dec 27, 2003
    #20
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.