O'Reilly Factor

I am a fan of his. But it tickles me, that Mr. Perfect, might just have
made a
mistake.....that could bring im down, or cost him. I like Fox, but that
crap about them being Fair&Balanced is bullButter. Depends upon which
Fox Show one is tuned in to......mostly, the Fox favors the Prez', Mr.
Bush.......in my opinioN....

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

Fox favors republicans. Not just Bush. Associated Press has many
articles on the subject.
--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! http://signup.databasix.com
===========================================================================

 

Which only starts to add a little balance to the mostly-Dem bias of
the rest of media.

Too bad they don't just shoot for the unbiased, but since the caused
the loss of Nam, they have gotten away from journalism and focused on
creating news instead of reporting it.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Which only starts to add a little balance to the
mostly-Dem bias of the rest of media.
Too bad they don't just shoot for the unbiased, but since the caused the
loss of Nam, they have gotten away from journalism and focused on
creating news instead of reporting it.
--
Mark Johnson
I'm trapped in remodeling hell
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good point.......that's why I say, when one quotes any kind of "soCalled
Facts" about Kerry, in a negative manner......I don't pay alotta
attention to it, because you can watch/listen to the network, of your
choice, and get the Facts that suit you......heehee
BUT, above you say...."they caused the loss of Nam?" what's that MEAN...
10-17-04@635am

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

BUT, what about Bill O'Reilly? does anybody in here like him, and tune
in to him at 7pm, on Fox......I pretty much do.
he's good...but cocky as heck...but he thinks he's so important, he
cannot understand why Kerry doesn't think Coming on His
‘‘Factor’’ is sooooo
Important.........gosh....And....Now, Bill O'relly is under
scrutiny..(sp) cause of his alledged sexual harresment!!!!!!!
10-17-04@640am

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

"BUT, above you say...."they caused the loss of Nam?" what's that MEAN..."

Just what it said. At the end of the Tet Offensive, the NV forces were
serious depleted, while it was touch, we really did come out of it on
top and in good shape to make it to the end as a win.

If you were around back then, you clearly remember that was not how it
was reported. Major networks were the primary cause for loss the loss
of home-front support (and people like Fonda and Kerry added gas to
the media fire). After seeing how their new methods of reporting on
Nam could influence public opinion and change the outcome to something
different than reality would have suggested, media in general (and
liberal media in particular) changed from being journalistic to
creating news and molding public opinion to that in keeping with their
agenda du jour.

 

I thought that no one would take a charge of sexual harassment seriously
after the Bill Clinton debacle. Or in other words, if you are
conservative and tell a female coworker a dirty joke, your an animal and
have no place on the Supreme Court but if you are the President of the
United States and a liberal, you can play hide the cigar with an intern
and get a pass. It kind of negates the whole sexual harassment angle.
James

 

I use to watch him when I had more time. Didn't always agree with his
assessment but he did ask good questions. He clearly sided with the
republicans in his political leanings, but he wasn't afraid to critize any
of them about an issue. When he wanted to actually get info from his 2
guests on a subject, he would pose questions equally to both of them. But
when he wanted he would slam a guest while appearing not to, make the guest
look idiotic with the answers by just brushing them away. Many tactics like
they used on CBS 60 minutes.

Also remember, even O'Reilly stated this many times, that his show was not a
news show but an editorial. That gives him free reign to go in any
direction he wants on a subject and post his opinion rather than actual
facts. So the No Spin zone really is a spin zone, he'll go in whatever
direction he needs to get viewers.

Bush didn't feel that he needed to appear before the NAACP. O'Reilly
defended that stance by Bush by saying Bush shouldn't have to go in front of
a hostle crowd. There is no way he was going to be listened too by them so
he shouldn't bother to go. Guess O'Reilly should go back and listen to his
own arguements. Using his own analogy there is no way O'Reilly is going to
listen to Kerry, O'Reilly already blasts him and along with FOX that would
be considered a hostile group so John Kerry shouldn't have to go.

 

Mark sez<>
Just what it said. At the end of the Tet Offensive, the NV forces were
serious depleted, while it was touch, we really did come out of it on
top and in good shape to make it to the end as a win.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tet offense? while it was touch? On top?
good shape? as a win?
not sure of these comments, whatChaMean?
<>Anyway<> and "come out on top" havent you read in some kind of history
somewhere, that we barely got out of Nam, we were evacuating and the
VietCong thousand and thousands were
within hours away from storming the city as we were loading people in
Helicopters on top of buildings! We didnt gain one thing in over 10
years of the so called police action.......the V-Nam War, caused Prez
johnson not 2 run as the incumbent, of which has never happened in
History..
Hate to tell ya, but NV is one of the biggest threats to the world as we
type....
And Kerry and Jane caused any of this...
you think?????shoot......<g>

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

<><>James~~~~~~I thought that no one would take a charge of sexual
harassment seriously after the Bill Clinton debacle. Or in other words,
if you are conservative and tell a female coworker a dirty joke, your an
animal and have no place on the Supreme Court but if you are the
President of the United States and a liberal, you can play hide the
cigar with an intern and get a pass. It kind of negates the whole sexual
harassment angle. James
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
a great point above..well said.

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

<>~~Also remember, even O'Reilly stated this many times, that his show
was not a news show but an editorial. That gives him free reign to go in
any direction he wants on a subject and post his opinion rather than
actual facts. So the No Spin zone really is a spin zone, he'll go in
whatever direction he needs to get viewers.
Bush didn't feel that he needed to appear before the NAACP. O'Reilly
defended that stance by Bush by saying Bush shouldn't have to go in
front of a hostle crowd. There is no way he was going to be listened too
by them so he shouldn't bother to go. Guess O'Reilly should go back and
listen to his own arguements. Using his own analogy there is no way
O'Reilly is going to listen to Kerry, O'Reilly already blasts him and
along with FOX that would be considered a hostile group so John Kerry
shouldn't have to go.
--
Elmer McKeegan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, O'reilly should go back and listen t some of his own
arguments....it gauls me..when he's interviewing someone that can out
tlak hi, and he actually get red faced......like Michael Moore, and a
couple other celebs that he couldnt out talk....Spin Zone....is the
theme of his show....but to brag on O'Reilly..he can really go after
those stupid Judges in California....basically. I enjoy him mucho..
but I know where he's coming from..most of us do....Kerry is not afraid
to go on his
Zone show, he just doesnt see the need as much as O'Reilly wishes Kerry
wood.......smile

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

I am not a fan of O'Reilly. But it amazes me how Mr. Jackass is always on
top of his game. Asking the toughest questions without taking sides and has
the absolutely best show in all of TV.

TeeInnTee

 

<>~<>.........I am not a fan of O'Reilly. But it amazes me how Mr.
Jackass is always on top of his game. Asking the toughest questions
without taking sides and has the absolutely best show in all of TV.
TeeInnTee
""""
<>~~~~~~~~~~~~~<>~~~~~~~~~~~~<>
I believe you just described your self as a huge fan of Mr Jackass. I
agree too, he duz ask some good tuff Q's, but he interrupts his guest
too often if they are
getting the best of him.....and it tickles me when he'll say"OKAY Mr.
DooDad, I'll let you have the last word" and when their last word,
doesnt soot him, he enterRupts and he gets the last Word" (g) he's
something alright and I watch' him al most every night.

<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

"tough" (not touch - typo)

Check your history again. After the Tet Offensive, the NVA was never
able to mount a large action again and the VC were relegated to
totally guerrilla methods. The north's losses were an multitudes
higher than ours.

What turned things around in spite of us "winning" Tet was the loss of
support back home (which then caused a loss of political support in
the congress). THAT was a direct result of media influence; presenting
the north as overwhelming and unstoppable. The war was won via the
media propaganda machine (which actually included a US reporter
informing the NVA about the location of US troops in at least one
documented instance, IIRC). This misinformation, along with the
propaganda coups of Fonda, Kerry, and others were where the Communists
won their war.

I have a real hard time reading your syntax. But the reason the
embassy was overrun toward the end was because it was known we were
pulling out. Of course they made a push as we were down to our last
100 people. BTW: "thousands and thousands" is hyperbole and didn't
happen. The big push came after we were gone and the north violated
the terms of our withdrawal (when they knew the south was on its own).
IIRC the north was still getting support (materials) from China too.

 

Kinda like you describing yourself as not being a fan?

TeeInnTee

 

Mark says:<><>I have a real hard time reading your syntax.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BJAY says: You do? what can I do to help you, hmmm, syntax.....hmmm?
ANyway, so you think the Viet Nam war, was a success? Is that what I am
reading?
It was so bad, that LBJ, wouldnt even run for a second term, that war
discouraged him to leaving DC, and going home and dying not long after
that!


<>haveAgoodDay-Bjay<>

 

That was much clearer. However, since you didn't restate the first
post, I am unable to adjust my response. The one you are now asking me
questions about.