One step closer to thought crime

snip

And why does it take 4 police oficers to ask a man to take down a
poster?

 

You might think I'm some kind of retard but I've got a lot more
experience than you'll ever have of living in a police state. Come
back and talk to me when you've lived in a country where you can be
lifted from your home and detained for 90 days without anyone being
told where you are and when (or if) you're released you're subject to
a banning order prohibiting you from being in the company of more than
three other people at the same time.

 

Very close isn't the same as actually happening.

 

*dingly*-*ding*

 

Bear with me; I'm not a fan of the Met or of bully-policing but consider
this - the bloke is a **** and needed a slap.

 

Why would you think that? There is no requirement to caution (and note
that this is what we're talking about - there's no such concept as
"reading his rights" in the UK) an alleged offender at all, except
that anything said while _not_ under caution can't be used in
evidence.

Even once he's been cautioned, that's not the same as being under
arrest.

 

Because that's what they always seem to do when they want to talk to
you about an offence, once they're certain there is an offence.

Dunno the ins & outs. It's always the same on the numerous ones I've
seen on Road Wars etc - arrest then caution. Even when it's just
something like a tiny bit of weed.

I still reckon there was something else going on to merit sending five
cops, & you certainly can't trust what he says when it comes to alleged
police brutality.

 

Seem to? Been watching too many cop shows, have we?

Actually, I don't think you'll see that on any of the reality ones, if
you listen and look closely.

 

Way too many, I go through phases of being addicted to them.

"Road Wars etc" are reality ones.

 

Well why didnt the BBC explain that in the first place?

 

Yes, I know. Now look and listen closely.

 

I did, last night. Lots of "I'm arresting for blah. You do not have to
say anything etc etc".

 

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandat_en_droit_pénal_français#Le_mandat_de_recherche

 

En droit pénal français, un mandat est « un acte par lequel un
magistrat (ordinairement un juge d\u2019instruction) prescrit que
telle personne lui soit amenée ou soit placée en détention. Les
différents mandats, définis par l\u2019art. 122 C.pr.pén., ne peuvent
viser qu\u2019une personne déjà tenue pour auteur ou complice des
faits » (Jean-Paul Doucet, Dictionnaire de droit criminel).

« Le mandat d\u2019arrêt est l\u2019ordre donné par un magistrat
répressif, à tout dépositaire de la force publique, de rechercher
telle personne, de l\u2019arrêter et de la conduire dans une maison
d\u2019arrêt (art. 122 C.pr.pén.). » (Doucet) La durée de la détention
est de maximum 24 heures.

 

ITYF it's

"Français, motherfucker, lisez-vous il?"

 

Lets cut to the chase: ****.

 

There's no 'practically' about it.
Animal Welfare Act 2006