Oi Blaney.

When looking at any evidence, you have to trust those providing it.
What's so wrong, in principle about asking people to trust one's own
knowledge around here? You can decide for yourself whether Blaney's the
sort of **** who'd make up a load of nonsense to support an argument, or
just a normal, run-of-the-mill ****.

 

I didn't say I didn't follow it; I said it didn't follow. There's a
difference.

I said that you didn't say what you were saying in response to my
comment about your first statement not following.

I think it's quite clear.

Well, you don't appear to be providing a great deal of evidence to the
contrary. So this is a bit of a non-argument.

 

Thing is, this is one of the few areas of discussion where I reckon I
know more than the average.

 

Selective snipping.

 

And you are stating as fact the opposite. Why do /I/ have to back my
position up and not you?

 

But TOG only had it for two days.

Good-oh.

 

Ben's also forgetting he's bought one SOB of /me/ and was talking
about buying another...

 

I forget, bless me.

 

First you don't follow it. Then you deny I said it. Now you don't accept
it. Which is it?

Probably better not to bother stating it then.
[/QUOTE]
Does this help:

http://www.london.labour.co.uk/ViewPage.cfm?Page=9004

 

Does this help:

http://www.london.labour.co.uk/ViewPage.cfm?Page=9004[/QUOTE]

Whittingham, you cheeky monkey. That's a copper, saying that the
reduction in crime rates is because there are more coppers. Well, he
would say that, wouldn't he!

 

Sorry about that I couldn't resist it.

"Always doubt something someone is telling you especially if they quote
an academic source or statistic.
They or their source always has an addenda that is not obvious at
first."
Mick's first law of survival in the business jungle.

 

Did you mean "agenda"? Actually, what you said strikes true too.
Analyst to code-monkey "Oh, didn't you get the updated spec then?"!

 

What is your agenda in telling me this.

etc!

 

It's the spill chucker again.

I never know whether to have it turned on of off. It's just that it
keeps telling me that I shouldn't sign off as Mick as this is an
offensive term for Irish men.

Been on both ends of that conversation at different times in my life.

 

To let you be as successful in business as me

Your not using projection psychology are you?

 

At first sight, I thought you were posting a link to this:

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/MayLond.html

 

Carry on!

Me? Imagine!