oh yeah, t-shirts

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by darsy, Oct 11, 2003.

  1. darsy

    Gunga Dan Guest

    Actually I was expecting someone to say "What, if the names weren't there
    it would prevent people from voting for their own design?"
     
    Gunga Dan, Oct 11, 2003
    #41
    1. Advertisements

  2. darsy

    sweller Guest

    At the risk you're being deliberately dim...

    A blind vote in as you don't know the author of the design. So it
    doesn't become a popularity contest. ATM, you may get a lot more votes
    than, say, Bear (had he entered)...
     
    sweller, Oct 11, 2003
    #42
    1. Advertisements

  3. Sorby wrote
    Swot I did.
     
    steve auvache, Oct 11, 2003
    #43
  4. darsy

    darsy Guest

    I was trying to be mildly funny.
    Yes, I know, but - hey - thanks!
    this contest is somewhat more fair than last time, as the designs are
    all presented in a similar way - last year, the "voting booth" was
    just a collection of links to designs on the designers own websites...
     
    darsy, Oct 11, 2003
    #44
  5. darsy

    sweller Guest

    yeah... right...

    Do you know, so was I. Yeah, that's it, so was I.
    Still an argument for it being blind. Although I couldn't get off my
    arse/have the ability to design one so why am I worrying.
     
    sweller, Oct 11, 2003
    #45
  6. darsy

    Sorby Guest

    Might as well join the fray and air my impressions publicly...

    I didn't vote for Cab's offering but I think it is a clever idea cleverly
    done. Respect.

    I also rated SteveM's gingerbread man design and Mark's painterly efforts.
    Nice work.

    I particularly liked Darsy & Simonk's arty submissions - I'd happily wear a
    t-shirt with those designs on all day every day!
    So I was disappointed to learn we might be limited on colours (somewhere
    else in this thread).
    However I'm sure I've heard of places that can transfer photographs onto
    t-shirts - in full(ish) colour.
    Are these prohibitively expensive or prohibitively crap?
     
    Sorby, Oct 11, 2003
    #46
  7. Sorby wrote:

    Indeed but most designs up there could be simplified in colourscheme and
    still look effective - your roadsign for example.
    Usually the second.

    However you may have noted my comments about digitransfer which can look
    damned good and not prohibitively expensive either, as the added expense
    is countered by lack of screens to be made and drying times between each
    colour etc.
     
    Doesnotcompute, Oct 11, 2003
    #47
  8. darsy

    Sorby Guest

    Cool. I realised afterwards it might need simplifying.
    Ah - yes - missed that. Ta.
     
    Sorby, Oct 11, 2003
    #48
  9. Paul Corfield, Oct 11, 2003
    #49
  10. darsy

    Slider Guest

    Slider, Oct 11, 2003
    #50
  11. well I quite like that one but a reference ukrmma seems pertinent - sign
    to the Channel Ports? Oh and some of the regional references are
    somewhat defunct.
     
    Paul Corfield, Oct 11, 2003
    #51
  12. darsy

    Cab Guest

    Heh, don't worry, I didn't vote for mine either. There were some
    better ones there.

    As it goes, I did that one as a 'colour limited' idea.
     
    Cab, Oct 11, 2003
    #52
  13. darsy

    Abso Guest

    Impressive, they're clearly using more than a simple screen print but,
    as I mentioned above, expensive. They are charging $15 per shirt as a
    base cost (without P&P and mark up) and although I'm sure there will be
    others who may be cheaper, it's still going to be a step up from a
    screen print process.
     
    Abso, Oct 11, 2003
    #53
  14. darsy

    SteveH Guest

    Bearing in mind that some of us will wear this T-shirt at non-ukrm
    events, I reckon it's preferable to go for something pretty simple with
    a more universal appeal.

    The problem with some designs, in particular Sorby's roadsign design is
    that they're (dare I say it) 'cliquey'.

    All IMHO of course, but I'd prefer something that's

    a: relatively 'clean' - so that you're not restricted in places you
    could wear it.
    b: fairly simple in it's message.
     
    SteveH, Oct 11, 2003
    #54
  15. darsy

    Sorby Guest

    But... there is no clique!

    Actually - you have to admit that UKRM is cliquey by nature. No?
    Valid points - but I don't like the idea of sterilising ukrm. It's a nasty,
    ugly place full of sick, pedantic wierdos - and I like it that way! :eek:)

    <thinks> Maybe I could change 'FCUKRM' to 'Oh Flip UKRM' ? </thinks>
     
    Sorby, Oct 11, 2003
    #55
  16. darsy

    Mr Precision Guest

    Mr Precision, Oct 11, 2003
    #56
  17. darsy

    Daz Guest

    Indeed! I've a lawn that needs mowing when you're ready. You've
    obviously far too much time on your hands :eek:)

    --
    Daz
    GSXR1000K2 - Fun
    Fazer600 - Purpose
    CBR600 - Racer
    MRO#26 | FOT#115 | FOF#48 | two#41
    http://www.highsideuk.com
    ukrm at btopenworld dot com
     
    Daz, Oct 11, 2003
    #57
  18. darsy

    Daz Guest

    Some cracking designs there. A couple of Sorby's got my vote but the
    law of averages made sure of that.

    --
    Daz
    GSXR1000K2 - Fun
    Fazer600 - Purpose
    CBR600 - Racer
    MRO#26 | FOT#115 | FOF#48 | two#41
    http://www.highsideuk.com
    ukrm at btopenworld dot com
     
    Daz, Oct 11, 2003
    #58
  19. darsy

    deadmail Guest

    Really need to vote for anything apart from Sorby's; he obviously wants
    it too much.
     
    deadmail, Oct 11, 2003
    #59
  20. darsy

    Snowleopard Guest

    Didn't he make a comment elsewhere about his missus being kept in the
    kitchen, perhaps he should let her out occasionally?
     
    Snowleopard, Oct 11, 2003
    #60
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.