OBD Computers

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Speedgazebo MOTP #1, Mar 11, 2011.

  1. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    Mark Olson Guest

    Bollocks in the extreme.
     
    Mark Olson, Mar 12, 2011
    #21
    1. Advertisements

  2. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    Ian Field Guest


    They've recently added Spain & USA to the numerous countries they publish
    in.
     
    Ian Field, Mar 12, 2011
    #22
    1. Advertisements

  3. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    SteveH Guest

    No idea and no, they're not.

    I know fuel is getting quite expensive, but I haven't yet come to the
    conclusion that it's worth driving slower to save a couple of quid over
    a full tank of fuel.

    I have a choice of cars on the drive - one does 45-50mpg, the rest do
    around 30mpg - yet I very rarely take the one that does 45-50mpg for
    personal use.
     
    SteveH, Mar 12, 2011
    #23
  4. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    R C Nesbit Guest

    Mark Olson spoke:
    *slightly* tongue in cheek, but in the 2 years I had it, irrespective of journey -
    long-distance commute, holidays, cross-town heavy traffic, sitting in the M1 J8 to
    12 car park, whatever, it consistently did around 19mpg.

    --
    Rob_P
    UKRM(at)indqualtec.co.uk
    uppercase(d) BBIWYMC#1 BOG#11? MRO#31 IBCDBBB#1(kotl)
    FJ1200, CCM130 Benelli Cabriolet (gone)
    Looks like Rab C Nesbit.
     
    R C Nesbit, Mar 13, 2011
    #24
  5. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    Krusty Guest

    It doesn't really, if you're prepared to burn enough fuel to get a
    reliable result by just doing each test with no other driving apart
    from those tests.
     
    Krusty, Mar 13, 2011
    #25
  6. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    Krusty Guest

    By getting someone to note down the reading every second & how long it
    takes to reach the target speed. Not totally accurate but if the
    difference is consistently big enough over a few runs, it's good
    enough.
     
    Krusty, Mar 13, 2011
    #26
  7. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    Monkey Guest

    Not even vaguely accurate, I'd say. You'd need to log MPG against road speed
    during the acceleration, for a start, so you could work out the fuel used
    over a given distance, and then a faster acceleration would mean longer
    spent at VMax, so you'd need to take that into account as well. The only
    representative way to do it would be to log fuel used over a given journey,
    once with hard accleration, and once more gentle, so we're back to measuring
    total fuel used and dividing it by trip distance. To get any real feel for
    fuel used in transient conditions, you'd need a much more comprehensive
    datalogger than a simple MPG readout.
     
    Monkey, Mar 13, 2011
    #27
  8. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    R C Nesbit Guest

    Krusty spoke:
    All he has to do is consciously drive different styles on his normal daily
    commute, make some simple notes, and save himself the cost of a tank of
    fuel by not buying a device of questionable value, quality, and veracity in
    the first place!

    --
    Rob_P
    UKRM(at)indqualtec.co.uk
    uppercase(d) BBIWYMC#1 BOG#11? MRO#31 IBCDBBB#1(kotl)
    FJ1200, CCM130 Benelli Cabriolet (gone)
    Looks like Rab C Nesbit.
     
    R C Nesbit, Mar 13, 2011
    #28
  9. Things were simpler back in the day - a good vacuum gauge told you when
    you could back off on the throttle and not lose speed and thus gain
    economy.
    Of course, with all the electronic shite on engines now, it's harder to
    tell, but the same principle applies - back off and gain mpg.
    It's surprising how little difference it makes to overall journey times
    to accelerate less harshly and save a bit of fuel. As bike riders, we
    get used to certain minimum acceleration levels and tend to drive cars a
    bit harder than the average Joe (a wide generalisation, I know, but I
    think it holds some water), and that's good.

    Otoh, when doing long distance M'way trips in the UK, I consistently
    found that my average including fuel stops was a miserable 55mph, so
    hardly earth-shattering speeds involved, with a cruising speed of
    80-85mph, just inside licence-retaining terrritory (assuming not too
    much speedo error).

    Otoooh, when driving the SOJC at the same speeds and acceleration as the
    Tranny (which I don't hang about in), I consistently get 50% greater mpg
    and more if I cba. To break 50mpg involves really driving like a gimmer,
    and it's no fun at all.
     
    Grimly Curmudgeon, Mar 13, 2011
    #29
  10. That's what I have done. Drive like a gimmer, 34 mpg, drive properly,
    28 mpg. I'm just trying to fine tune it a bit.
     
    Speedgazebo MOTP #1, Mar 13, 2011
    #30
  11. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    boots Guest

    I (for my sins) had a fronterra as a company car for a while,
    basically it always did 20mpg unless I was towing in which case it was
    18mpg.
     
    boots, Mar 14, 2011
    #31
  12. Speedgazebo  MOTP #1

    boots Guest

    In the car I just fill up when the light comes on. I don't really give
    a toss what the MPG is. I know it will be somewhere between 350 & 450
    miles after the last fill, usually closer to the lower.
     
    boots, Mar 14, 2011
    #32
  13. I care about the mileage in this car because it's car I only use for
    work and more mileage means more profit.
    I couldn't even guess what I get from the Eunos, or the bike because I
    drive them because I want to.
     
    Speedgazebo MOTP #1, Mar 14, 2011
    #33
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.