NSPCC Parlimentary Ride - anybody going?

The difference is they potray themselves as something apart from the old
"corrupt" and unrepresentative parties but in reality are no different.
If anything as they tend to be from quite limited stock they're worse.

 

Ben Blaney wrote

ROFL

 

It's useful shorthand but, as you say, hackneyed. It doesn't stand up to
close examination either.

I don't mean policies as such, more credo. If, for example, it were a
person expressed desire to deny people life, or the means for life, based
on their race, religion or sex then it would be immoral and impossible to
defend. Irrespective of the specific 'policy' used to achieve these ends.

Life, and by its nature this also means politics, is a series of moral
decisions. These are absolutes.

Where do /you/ draw the line?

 

Is your dad a tory or labout minister?

 

C of E.

 

it's *Ben* who's the "layabout minister".

 

<childish snigger>

 

thanks for posting the article - most interesting. I particularly liked
the above example of outright stupidity.

We can only hope these morons get voted out and the voters exercise some
sense. I won't hold my breath though.

 

When butterfingers attack!

 

It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the

Christ, it must be like working with Finbar Saunders.

--

Dave

GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
SbS#6 DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#6 FUB#3
FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19 COSOC#10

 

You don't know the half of it.

 

It's good to know that someone like Gyp is right behind you all the way
though, isn't it?

 

Fair does. I was personally happy with having dragged omnipotence out
of my vocabulary bank, I need to work up to these things usually.

 

Nan?[1]









[1] It's just she always used to talk to me in that tone of voice.

 

Read it and weep.

 

****, no. We've already got swellernan posting, it'll be Blaneynan in
a trice, you mark my words.

 

Absolutely. He's well inside my comfort zone.

 

They have changed from kicking all foreigners out, to trying to bribe
them to go, surely that is milder?

Not what I said.

 

I am not argueing the case for the BNP, Everyone has the right to
choose and the right to speak.

Then you remind me.

 

Sorry, you didn't, it was the abuse towards someone who has a different
view.
Some people who want free speech still do not accept it unless it
agrees with them. (not directed at you by the way)