Norton Commando sighting

Discussion in 'UK Motorcycles' started by Sean, Aug 1, 2006.

  1. Sean

    Sean Guest

    Riding Baby Bear's bike* home from work I met a bloke on a shiny
    black, beautifully restored 1972 Norton Commando 750.

    It looked a lot like this; what a gorgeous machine:

    http://www.jerrydoe.com/commandoslideshow/timingsidefull.jpg

    There's something about vintage Brit bikes that stirs a fond yearning
    in my neocortex or archipallium or whatever it is that resonates.

    Maybe Columbanus of Bobbio will smile on me and put one in my future.

    ps. This short history of the Commando says some of the 750cc models
    had proved to be unreliable with main bearing and head gasket
    problems -- I wonder which ones. Gotta do some research I guess.
    http://website.lineone.net/~alan.shaw/nortonhist.htm

    Sean_Q_
    BC, Canada

    * Virago 250
     
    Sean, Aug 1, 2006
    #1
    1. Advertisements

  2. Perhaps get a "new" one:
    http://www.norvilmotorcycle.co.uk/
     
    Martin Coogan, Aug 1, 2006
    #2
    1. Advertisements

  3. Sean

    Moon Badger Guest

    Nice looking bikes, but that website is a fucking eyesore. Kiddies with
    crayons appear to have unleashed.
     
    Moon Badger, Aug 1, 2006
    #3
  4. Sean

    Hog Guest

    Yes the 750 Commando crankshaft flexed sufficiently to ruin it's main
    bearings. The solution is "barrel roller" bearings.

    I quote:
    "These are well-known in the Norton community. In 1972, Norton
    introduced its Combat engine, which unfortunately lived up to its name
    by turning itself into shrapnel before the warranty period was even half
    over. Chief among the problems was the crank bearings; up to this point,
    Norton had used a ball bearing on the drive side and a roller bearing on
    the timing side of its twins, but the Combat was capable of power levels
    that were pushing a standard ball bearing's ability to cope.
    So Norton went with a roller bearing on both ends of the crank. Now, a
    roller can cope with more load than a ball bearing, all things being
    equal, but it has one drawback; it is less forgiving of misalignment and
    crankshaft flex than is a ball bearing. And the Combat engine would flex
    its crank, especially at high rpm, leading to embrittlement of the
    rollers and scoring of the bearing races with resulting nastiness of a
    rotating kind.

    It was a financial and public-relations nightmare for Norton, and was
    only cured when they went to the so-called Superblend bearing, which
    have rollers that are the tiniest bit barrel-shaped, allowing for some
    normal crank flex while still retaining their superior load-bearing
    qualities"

    HTH
     
    Hog, Aug 1, 2006
    #4
  5. Yes. It looks like a ransom note.
     
    Martin Coogan, Aug 1, 2006
    #5
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.