New V5

This morning's post brought a new format V5[1].

There are some *interesting* (read sinister) new bits of information
that appear on it (currently blank on mine):

Q Power/Weight ratio (kW/kg)
(only for motorcycles)

U Sound Level
U.1 stationary (dB(A))
U.2 engine speed (min-1)
U.3 drive-by (dB(A))


Hmmm... I wonder what the cunts are planning to do with those?


[1] You know, then one that costs £19 to replace if you lose it.

 

Ask them. And ask your MP.

 

Hmm hadn't spotted those, all on the SZR one too..

Guess I really do have to make the ZRX a silly bike at some point, on
the old V5.

 

Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique, ogden

My MP is Peter Lilley[1]. I don't think I'll bother...

[1] Which (curiously) is an anagram of "Useless Wanker"

 

It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Nigel Eaton

In future MoTs you'll be asked to bring the V5 so the tester can compare
the noise as is with the noise as was.

--

Dave

GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
SbS#6 DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#6 FUB#3
FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19 COSOC#10

 

:

More curiously, I've seen this anagram before for someone else, but Google
comes up with 0 hits for *anagram "useless wanker"*.

 

So all MOT stations are going to have to buy decibel meters to test the
bikes noise output in the station then have you drive by at a specified
speed and distance and revs to test the noise on the move?

I don`t think so.

--
Petel .
02 M2 Buell.(130dba;-)
C90-ZZR.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/peteh1/website/index.html

 

(Bob) wrote in message

Have you ever had any dealings with MPs?

I'm sure there are some that are useless and exploit their power.
However most of them are extreemly capable individuals who could have
made considerably more in industry (and have worked less to do this).

I certainly wouldn't do their job.

 

Nigel Eaton was seen penning the following ode to ... whatever:

It's obviously for your own good, comprende?

 

It was somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the

Not so much the driveby, as the static test, iwt.

--

Dave

GS 850 x2 / SE 6a
SbS#6 DIAABTCOD#16 APOSTLE#6 FUB#3
FUB KotL OSOS#12? UKRMMA#19 COSOC#10

 

Sorry to disagree; but those in power (esp. the cabinet) are thieving back
stabbing scrotes. Just read the papers, they sack truth tellers
(whistleblowers), pay themselves expenses they haven't expended (MEPs in
particular), claim rent allowances for flats they sub let - Christ it's
never ending. They are corrupt beyond the bounds of normal belief.

John

 

Thieving? I doubt it.

Back-stabbing, well of course. They're politicians. Look at *any*
professional people in a competitive position and they'll behave in ways
that could be described as back-stabbing.

Sacking of whistle-blowers; generally done by the under-secretaries (or
much further down the ladder). I doubt that most cabinet ministers have
any experience of sacking civil servants.

MEPs- out of scope. MPs claiming expences that they haven't expended,
well in many cases the allowances are fixed and aren't based on
expenditure. I don't think there's much of this anymore tbh.

Rent allowances, I'd like to see where this has happened recently; I
can't recall anything in the last five or so years.

Corrupt beyond belief? Absolutely not, we have (probably) some of the
most honest politicians in the world.

 

It's less challenging to think that than to really /think/ isn't it.