motorcycle vs car safety

Discussion in 'Australian Motorcycles' started by Sl33py Beast, Mar 3, 2004.

  1. Sl33py Beast

    Knobdoodle Guest

    X-No-archive: yes
    Intact Kneeslider wrote in message ...
    Errmm.. not sure I'm getting your point here.. (actually I'm NOT getting
    your point but I didn't want to appear dumb).
    What I meant was that there's not much to "injure" you in modern cars so you
    either get of scott-free (i.e. bumps and bruises but no medical
    intervention) or you get killed.
    Whereas a bike crash is far more likely to give you a cut, scrape, or broken
    bone...
    (I think Peter Cremasco probably said this better in a later message)
    Clem
     
    Knobdoodle, Mar 5, 2004
    #81
    1. Advertisements

  2. That's exactly how I interpreted it, and before Jules (where da phuq's she
    disappeared off to, anyway?) or Doug chime in with what they might have
    observed at work...

    ....what I was getting at is the opposite of your idea. My head's full of
    other concepts at the moment, so I have to resort to example to illustrate
    what I mean:

    -Consider a frontal collision. These days, you have a crumple zone, which
    absorbs some of the impact energy and controls the way the car deforms. The
    firewall can still buckle and trap and snap your legs. The difference
    between that and what would've happened 25 years ago is that, back then,
    without the crumple zone, the engine would've wound up in your lap, or the
    seat mounts would've sheared, pitching you forehead-first into the dash,
    getting you killed.

    -In a side impact, side-intrusion bars only stop the cabin from caving in on
    itself completely and side airbags stop your head from twatting the
    B-pillar. The car can still deform enough to give you a broken arm. The
    difference is, the car ploughing into the side of you hasn't run you over
    while you were still in your seat.

    Dig? The variation of likely injury with ferocity of impact in modern,
    cossetting vehicles doesn't go fine-fine-fine-fine-fine-dead. It's more like
    fine-fine-shaken-banged up-broken bones-broken bones and internal
    injuries-dead, whereas in older cars, it would've gone fine-shaken/banged
    up-broken bones/internal injuries-dead.

    Ie. you still get just as injured and just as killed, but severity of impact
    required for given harm to the occupants goes up, and probably spreads out
    somewhat. Just like, and I say this against my better judgement, but I can't
    help it, protective gear on a bike.
     
    Intact Kneeslider, Mar 5, 2004
    #82
    1. Advertisements

  3. Sl33py Beast

    Theo Bekkers Guest

    How did you know Zebee's mother has horses?

    Theo
     
    Theo Bekkers, Mar 5, 2004
    #83
  4. Sl33py Beast

    conehead Guest

     
    conehead, Mar 5, 2004
    #84
  5. Sl33py Beast

    Knobdoodle Guest

    X-No-archive: yes
    Oh OK; then I was getting your point after all.
    No, I disagree.
    (Except for the bit about "severity of impact required for given harm to the
    occupants goes up" which I agree with... and I don't really know whether to
    agree or disagree with the head-twatting until I get some more details)
    Clem
    ~
    Intact Kneeslider wrote in message ...
    ~
     
    Knobdoodle, Mar 5, 2004
    #85
  6. In aus.motorcycles on Fri, 05 Mar 2004 06:27:32 GMT
    I suspect that even per km travelled, I've been hurt more on bikes than
    she has on horses.

    (and don't ask about me and horses!)

    Zebee
    - who has never won a fight with the law of gravity
     
    Zebee Johnstone, Mar 5, 2004
    #86
  7. Bloody nudists

    ---
    Cheers

    PeterC [aka MildThing]
    '81 Suzuki GS450-s
    '87 BMW K100RT

    www.dmcsc.org.au
     
    Peter Cremasco, Mar 5, 2004
    #87
  8. Sl33py Beast

    John Littler Guest

    Hey Clem, he just called you a "survivor"* !

    JL
    *That's bad innit ? It means you have to go on some stupid TV show or something
    ?
     
    John Littler, Mar 5, 2004
    #88
  9. Perhaps I should say, from the other side of this story, it took me 5
    years before I decided that Zebee was not going to die immediately.
    And when, later, I accepted a pillion ride with her, and decided I might
    like to try it, I had the problem of my own mother living with me.
    I sought Zebee's advice on the problem of coping with a mother, and it was
    - after a little thought :)
    "If you really want to do something you shouldn't let that stand in your
    way."
    So I took lessons, and got a bike. And because I didn't wish to have a
    weather forecast discussion every day I simply made the decision that I
    would ride to work rain hail or shine, every day. Which I have done, and
    am very glad that I am not at all afraid of wet weather. (Except for
    Lightning).

    clare
     
    Clare Johnstone, Mar 6, 2004
    #89
  10. Sl33py Beast

    Doug Cox Guest

    So is your mum riding yet?... : )

    Doug Cox.
    Work to ride, Ride to work...
     
    Doug Cox, Mar 6, 2004
    #90
  11. Sl33py Beast

    BT Humble Guest

    Awwww! C'mere and gimme a hug, ya big lugnut! :-D


    BTH
     
    BT Humble, Mar 7, 2004
    #91
  12. Careful what you wish for, country-boy!

    Hammo
     
    Hamish Alker-Jones, Mar 7, 2004
    #92
    1. Advertisements

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.